SkylerLovefist

Hi SkylerLovefist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 06:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Impact Roster Discussion

please, dont add unsourced material to the rodter. there is no source about them signing with Impact. appearing duri g tv tapings isnt enough.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but given you are the one making unhelpful and disruptive edits in this case, I think you should perhaps heed your own advice. Whomever removed James Mitchell was wrong to remove him in the first place, and Impact obviously has plans with Jessicka Havok moving forward. This is honestly a case of "I feel this is dubious therefore no" as opposed to reverting vandalism. Please stop. SkylerLovefist (talk) 09:43, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

"impact obviously has plans with Jessicka Havok moving forward" is WP:OR and CRYSTALBALL. Assumption works in both ways, but you need reliable sources, I don't. You don't know her status or Impact plans for her. I hear a lot of "Impact has plans" just to not use the wrestler next week. These are not opinions, are Wikipedia policies --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

With all due respect, I looked at the history of the Impact roster and there have been several edit wars at points involving yourself where people you have said aren't going to be full-time workers have turned out to be full-time workers, thus causing unnecessary hostility. Now if the policy for the article were that we aren't allowed to add talent until the episodes in question air on television, then I would fully agree with you. However, this very much strikes me as "because I say so" editing.

I agree with Sabu and Muta being removed because they're obviously temporary or one-shot hires. Disco Inferno has been used frequently but I wouldn't add him as he sticks to his own self-contained storylines. However, Havok interfered in a match to do with the current Su Yung storyline. I understand Wikipedia has policies, but it is not difficult to tell the difference between active workers who are signed, local talent used solely for one taping and legends making cameos.SkylerLovefist (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

If they become full time, I'm the first to put him in the roster, but at the time, they weren't. The problem is other users include them just because they appeared. For example, one user included Crazy Steve under the argument "dude, he won his match." Next week, Crazy Steve is gone. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Unhelpful Edit Discussion and Clarification

I'm not to be mean here but where did you here about daga or flamita signed a contract or on their website. I didn't know y'all didn't do the 30 day thing and suicide is on their website. Not being just stating facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamilb2004 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

The sources linked to next to their names. Konnan stated Flamita was coming to Impact and Daga himself says he signed a contract with Impact. It's strange to me that you're editing Wikipedia and unfamiliar with how sources work.SkylerLovefist (talk) 23:07, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of Impact Wrestling personnel, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 18:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but are you not the one who added that he returned to Impact on his very article? SkylerLovefist (talk) 20:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Returning under a mask is not the same as being signed to Impact and a roster member. Two huge different things. You added him to their roster of employees with a citation that did not say he was signed. That is WP:SYNTH. Sure he probably is back for a run, but we don't need to rush. We just got blasted on the dirt sheets for saying TJP was signed when he responded that he wasn't. StaticVapor message me! 01:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi SkylerLovefist,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi SkylerLovefist,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi SkylerLovefist,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

MLW Promotors

Sorry about that, that was an oversight on my part. I thought it said just the valets were called promoters. (BackLash (talk) 10:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of National Wrestling Alliance personnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Taylor's back.

Even though I wasn't the one who kept putting Taylor Wilde back on the list, I took it upon myself to find a reference (from a solid reliable source in Fightful) to verify she is indeed back in Impact Wrestling, so hopefully this can be put to bed.

Vjmlhds (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

That's cool man, much appreciated. The only one I knew of was from Fightful Premium. I just wanted to see *someone* other than myself, you or Chaosithe throwing sources on edits since we three seem to be the ones doing all the legwork on that page. Plus it keeps the usual sticklers from complaining. SkylerLovefist (talk) 06:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Addicted4517

Everyone on Wikipedia in the professional wrestling community has had enough of this Addicted4517. If you look at his contributions, all he does is removes content. He would rather nitpick and be pedantic as f* then add anything constructive and improve Wikipedia. The only thing he is addicted to is addicted to being an a-hole!. Socks 01 (talk) 08:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

You aren't helping as you have history of this sort of conduct and were previously warned for it. You are the one not being constructive here. Addicted4517 (talk) 08:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

That's a tad bizarre, don't you think, mate? How would you know this was even posted here unless you're following people around? SkylerLovefist (talk) 09:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

He tagged me in the comment in case you didn't notice. Addicted4517 (talk) 09:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

NZWPW

Hi, another user has reported me here about my edits to NZWPW because the Addicted user told on me! This user, Hockeycatcat is claiming my edits to the New Zealand Wide Pro Wrestling page were malicious. How silly. I can't see how changing "is" to "was" or "-present" to "-2018" is malicious. They were minor edits and the user sent me three warnings one after another, one being a "final" warning. I stopped after the final warning. I was simply trying to add accurate information because the company no longer exists. And I guess we have to give up. I guess the NZ wrestling pages will have to be incorrect then. They know they are wrong and respond by reporting users and trying to get them blocked. Socks 01 (talk) 09:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I can't grasp it myself. It's impossible to provide a finishing date outside of using the "hiatus" as proof itself. I don't understand how providing names and events is "OR" when the company clearly no longer exists. SkylerLovefist (talk) 09:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Provide evidence now, do it right now. Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me, who are you, and who are you to be demanding I "provide evidence right now?"SkylerLovefist (talk) 18:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

NZPWI

Hi, you should get David Dunn to post an article on NZPWI about New Zealand's current and past pro wrestling promotions. Socks 01 (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC). He could explain the history of KPW, NZWPW, CPW etc. Socks 01 (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for the help trying to maintain the integrity of Wikipedia especially about pro wrestling. Socks 01 (talk) 11:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop sending me malicious messages and deleting my edits

Whay wrong with you? you accused me (disruptive editing)? really? and you threatened to block me? by my edit in NWA Roster? about Jeremiah? hey my friend i dont have a photo with the NWA signed contract, do u have the Bhupinder Singh contract? NO!, u dont watch NWA Power, you say he have only 1 match FALSE, he have 3 matches in this season or since NWA Back for the Attack. NWA dont have a roster section, all other wrestlers in the list are listed by the matches, my intention is colaborate, do not make edits malicious as you think, and i know how works wikipedia, what about your source of Bhupinder Singh? 2 years ago? he dont have matches, he dont appear in the Impact Roster web, but u still putting and putting in the list, if he is on BCW put in BCW Roster, or if he is a development wrestler as you say, put in another section like the WWE Performance Center. and plase, i dont want see u again, deleting my edits.

User:FranXBSCUser talk:FranXBSC 05:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC-5)

If I could get that in English, that would be nice. Here is how Wikipedia works, Fran: If things are added or deleted, they need a reference. If you don't have a reference, your edit is invalid. Your constant removals of contracted Impact talent is considered vandalism because you have no proof of them departing the company. In the case of this, you have no source for the addition to your roster. Therefore, the edit is invalid, just like your removal of Bhupinder and Shogun. As you can see from the reference under both guys, I have sources. You do not. Now desist with your childish tantrums and provide a source before I get an administrator involved. SkylerLovefist (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

English isnt my first languaje, don't emphasize something that could be malicious. so, I put the "source" of Jeremiah, again u said he have only 1 match, and i probe this is false he have 3 matches, ok Odison also have 3 matches, and u dont delete him from the list, why? can u explain me? what its the source of the half of the wretlers? contracts? NO, only NWA TV tapings results, so what is the logic here?. NWA dont have Roster Section in NWA web. But IMPACT have a roster section, and i dont see Bhupinder, i never deleted Shogun, (idk why u said that i deleted him). so your 3 sourcres of Bhupinder Singh are: link 1 (404 not found) its the old impact web. link 2 one source from 2020, link 3, the video of the Gut Chek so Gut Chek is a reality show, the price is a Impact contract, and the winner was Shogun. but if u are happy puting Bhupinder Singh in the impact roster its ok, may be he return may be not. do u have the time of the contract in BCW? its forever? idk. i only know that Bhupinder dont wrestle in Impact since 2019, and dont appear in the web. Only stop follow me editions, and deleted. User:FranXBSCUser talk:FranXBSC 07:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC-5)

Provide sources, as I have to counter your vandalism. SkylerLovefist (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Matthews

You have several sources stating that Buddy Matthews is the new ringname. Please, use one of them, not just a Twitter account. [1] [2] --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Very much appreciated. I wasn't aware those were there, plus I've used Twitter as a source for signings before. SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry. I was just surprised that, after back and forth, no one tried to include a reliable source stating that he is using a new name. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

@HHH Pedrigree: I did actually look but the PW Insider one wasn't on my last search. All I saw were sources that are deemed unreliable. That is top shelf reliable and should be the one used. 411 Mania isn't top shelf and I personally wouldn't use it. Twitter is not reliable for anything controversial in BLP's. Anyway, thanks for the pick up. Addicted4517 (talk) 08:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

That was utterly unnecessary. See, I understand we're supposed to be WP:CIVIL, but things like that make it difficult sometimes. First there's an edit war that could have been avoided completely with incorrect policy citations, and now the source which HHHPedrigree gave me got overridden. SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC) And the PWI article uses his ****ing Twitter as it's main source! For God's sake...SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Addicted4517 (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I've removed an unacceptable comment about other contributors from your user page. Please don't resintate it. I'd be happy to address any questions you have about our sourcing requirements, and you are welcome to express negative opinions about policy, but you can't make offensive remarks about contributors, even if you don't name them when you do so. WP:POLEMIC and WP:NPA are worth reading. Thank you. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Well perhaps other users shouldn't proceed to instigate an edit war over using someone's Twitter as a source, then proceed to overwrite my source with another source which uses the Twitter they claimed wasn't good enough as a source. The fact that my conduct is considered "unacceptable" while their's isn't raises several questions. SkylerLovefist (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

barnstar

		The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
		This is how you do a barnstar. Awarded to SkylerLovefist for fighting the good fight on the List of Impact Wrestling personnel article. Vjmlhds 22:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Your conduct is not appropriate on my talk page and I request that you disengage and do not converse with me in any way in the future. You have demonstrated to me a mentality that seeks to own content and policy and therefore are not willing to listen to rightful corrections insisting that you are correct without any evidence. I will as of now remove any content you place on my talk page no matter what, as is my right. Thank you. Addicted4517 (talk) 10:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Throwing childish tantrums isn't WP: Civil either, just like logging out and leaving uncivil comments isn't. As usual, your edits are unhelpful and in bad faith, along with yourself being unwilling to be wrong and work with other users. Any further undoing of edits from you is going to get an ANI.

And yeah. *I'm* the one who acts like he owns content. There's an old axiom somewhere about a pot and a kettle there. SkylerLovefist (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

SkylerLovefist, if you restore posts an editor has removed from their talk page again, I will block your account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Right, he does nothing but undermines other users, throws a tantrum because he's been proven irrefutably wrong in this case, acts uncivil and *I'm* the one getting threatened with a block. That makes perfect sense. How about you crack down on the guy with a history of unhelpful edits first? SkylerLovefist (talk) 22:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm not interested in your content dispute. Your battleground attitude and harassment are another matter. You've been warned multiple times regarding civility; you need to heed those warnings to avoid a block. If you cannot control your temper, please walk away from your keyboard.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Fantastic reasoning. "I don't care about his conduct being negative, I'm going to hold things irrelevant to this situation against you in spite of you being correct."

And 'my "harassment"', eh? Now, I note that this guy never made a single edit to Impact's personnel list until after he started edit warring with me on Buddy Murphy's Wiki page, and then suddenly there's Addicted on said page making false edits as usual. Maybe don't try accusing someone of something the other party is more guilty of than they are.

The people on this website are something else,man. You gotta laugh. SkylerLovefist (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

As an administrator it's actually required that I don't get involved in content disputes and also take administrative action in the same dispute. You repeatedly restoring posts another editor has removed from their talk page is considered harassment; Addicted4517 gave a link to the relevant policy in their edit summaries when removing the content. So, I'm telling you in the clearest possible terms, don't do it again or you will be blocked. If there are content concerns with an article, the article talk page is the venue to hash out consensus. If there are long-term behavioural problems with a specific editor, then WP:ANI is available to you, but you need to leave the battleground mentality at the door if you will be starting a thread there.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, so in other words, he's allowed to undermine other users, he doesn't even cite policies correctly, I'm a big meanie even when I'm trying to do things by the book. Gotcha. SkylerLovefist (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

And as evidenced by that little note he left on your talk page, he thinks he's infallible. Come on. The guy's entire edit history is nitpicking at people and not making helpful edits at all. SkylerLovefist (talk) 06:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Skyler, I urge you to review you behavior. We explained several wiki policies and, instead of change, you keep doing the same thing. We explained that Twitter isn't reliable and, instead of using other sources, you keep using tweets. For example, the Buddy Matthews. They told you that a tweet isn't allowed because WP:TWITTER. instead of looking for another source, you kept including the same tweet that people told you isn't allowed. Also, if a policy says that IMDB is not reliable, the information is out. No "keep it until we find a better source", no. If we don't have reliable sources, we can't include the information. I would love to include a lot of information, but I can't until I find a good source. Addicted is doing nothing wrong, since his edits are following policies. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

So, contributing nothing to any articles, solely removing other user's content rather than making helpful edits, violating WP: Hound, incorrectly using several policies to nitpick at others, deliberately being unwilling to work with others and deliberately trying to get the last word in when proven wrong by making spiteful, nitpicky edits aren't breaking the rules. Got it. SkylerLovefist (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

He is contributing to the articles by removing information that isn't properly sourced. "helpful eitions" are not any kind of information with unreliable sources. Again, this is not he vs you or they vs you. People told you some policies you are not following, so is understandable that your editions are removed. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Except he isn't. He's literally just showing up to nitpick at people. Let's take the Buddy Murphy and Masha Slamovich issues. It's not that hard to run some Google Fu and update your sources if they aren't "to your standards."

And if you'll read what I've said multiple times, he's not "telling me some policies," he's misusing multiple policies. Maybe if people would actually pay attention and look at his edits and post history, you'll see what he's doing properly. Who are you, anyway? You're not an admin. SkylerLovefist (talk) 17:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Again, keep calm. I'm not an admin, but a fellow user who ask you to reason. You included information with bad sources and other user reverted, which is normal. Yes, other users can help you, but the usual way is you have to find reliable sources, since you are the one who is writing the information in the fist place. Abot the real name, as I said, I made a research in the RS list, but I found nothing, so there is, at the moment, no way to source that information. Using unreliable sources, like WInc, is not the solution. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Look mate, at the end of the day, my issue isn't "Him trying to help." There are other users on that page who do help, by supplying better sources. I'm not on Wikipedia around to clock, and if something needs a source, I'll source it if I can find one. I don't know which ones are and aren't allowed off the top of my head outside of the ones at the top of the page.

Moreover, my issue is that this guy's entire history is undermining people. Not a single edit he's made has been to add to a page. All of his edits are literally undoing other people's work, and if he's proven wrong, he'll deliberately do that "last word" editing to save face as he did when you helped me with Buddy Murphy. There was no need for him to change the source when you provided one for me. That was literally him doing that to get at me out of spite. He did it again with the guy whose name is a bunch of letters regarding the entire Jon Burton issue. There are multiple instances of him citing WP articles incorrectly. His entire history is removing people's edits, incorrectly using WP articles, and essentially trying to act infallible and work against other users, as opposed to helping others. And therein is my issue: Wikipedia shouldn't be about egos, yet clearly for this guy, it is. SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Again, he is removing content that is not sourced or sourced with bad, unreliable sources. That's helpful. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Now then, since Addicted is doing the thing he's done two other times previously, i.e. gone to other users to badmouth me, here's the definition of WP:HOUND which meets his behaviour to a tee:

"The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason." All of Addicted's edits are removing people's work. None of his edits involve adding to articles, merely removing things and sniping at other users. He's deliberately undermined myself and VJ personally a couple of times, thus the Jon Burton issue. The Buddy Murphy issue was utterly ridiculous and didn't need to happen, yet he kept insisting valid sources were not valid, capped off with him claiming an article linking to a tweet he said was an invalid source was a valid source when the only reference was the tweet. Not only is that hounding, that's deliberately being a smartarse, quite frankly.

"Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions."

First off, this guy never made a single edit on the List of Impact Personnel page until we had that run-in about Buddy Murphy, after which he followed me there to start another edit war. He's done this to others in the past as well. He's clever in the way he does it, mind you. Professional facade and whatnot. However, I had an incident with an IP address user who oddly enough happened to have their IP located in the same town Addicted is from, based on his edits who was violating WP: CIVIL. Now, it may not be Addicted himself, but it's a rather odd coincidence. This guy isn't doing the things he's doing to be a helpful editor. He's doing it to be a nuisance. You'll note this guy is the only one I've really had any issues with here. Otherwise, edits on the Impact Personnel page run quite civilly and to me are how Wikipedia SHOULD work. Not one user who never adds anything to articles trying to start Wikidrama.

And again, no they aren't. He's removing valid ones, i.e. with Jon Burton, according to this guy the episode of BTI where Jon Burton himself said he was leaving the company isn't a valid source that Jon Burton has left the company. How is that "helpful?" SkylerLovefist (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

He didn't asked me to intercede in this issue. I just saw a discussion and tried to talk. And yes, I agree with him that several articles are wrongly sourced with unreliable sources. Again, he is removing work because the work is wrongly sourced, no just because he wants. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

• headdesk* I give up. This clown can do whatever he wants to be unhelpful, and the rest of us have to put up with it. Got it. SkylerLovefist (talk) 20:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

• The thread above is filled with you making personal attacks and casting aspersions regarding another editor. This type of incivility and battleground mentality must stop if you want to continue editing this collaborative project.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Oh, fun! Blocked for voicing opinions about people's conduct on my own talk page! It isn't "incivility and casting aspersions," it's fact based on interactions if you'd actually bother to look at what he's done instead of singling me out.

Oh wait, that involves admitting you're wrong, which people don't like doing on this website. What an utter load of BS. SkylerLovefist (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

A belated thank you for this edit. I can't believe that crap had been in the article for three years! Added here. Bishonen | tålk 19:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC).

Much appreciated. SkylerLovefist (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Jay White

It really does look like "Switchblade" is done - for now - in Impact, and Impact just needs to do some housekeeping on their website.

Vjmlhds (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Gotcha. Cheers. SkylerLovefist (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello 07:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, it can be resolved by you guys not continuing to make unhelpful edits. SkylerLovefist (talk) 07:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SkylerLovefist reported by User:Czello (Result: ). Thank you. — Czello 08:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Got a minute?

Your block is close to expiring.

Once it does, come find me on my talk page.

You and I need to chat, because I'm feeling like I'm getting dragged into to this feud you have going with Addicted. Whenever he and I cross paths, he's always dropping your name, then I have to defend myself and go back and forth with him, and a lot of this would stop if you 2 would bury the hatchet (and preferably not in each other's skulls).

He can turn down the "holier-than-thou" stuff a bit, but you could also not be so "guns blazing" towards him as well.

As I said, if you two could make nice, it would make your life easier, his life easier, and my life easier, and then we could all live happily ever after.

Whenever you're ready, let's get 'er done as a wise man once said.

Vjmlhds (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Impact/NJPW

Saw your comment regarding Juice Robinson...here's the thing...

NJPW lets their guys do side work in the U.S. (as long as it doesn't interfere with NJPW business), so all these "pass throughs" are just that - guys passing through, doing a little side hustle while they're on this side of the Pacific.

Impact puts them on their roster, they get their use out of them, and when they go back to Japan, they get quietly removed...seen it ad nauseum (Jay White, Hikuleo, El Phantasmo, Kushida, Juice)

So the truth is, while NJPW is their fulltime gig, they can also have side jobs as well. Vjmlhds 04:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I getcha. It's just a pain to add and remove.people every three months or so. I still remember when they added EL-P back in after he made one appearance and then removed him again. Odd. SkylerLovefist (talk) 07:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

No roster ever stays perfectly still, people come and go all the time. Just the nature of the beast. Vjmlhds (talk) 14:41, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A Head's Up

You may want to be made aware of this. Looks like someone is looking to bring in the big guns (an admin) to try to "teach you a lesson". Vjmlhds (talk) 15:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

All this over not being allowed to bully other usrs. Really really sad, innit? SkylerLovefist (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Remember how we talked about letting a Wiki grudge take over your whole life? Well... Vjmlhds (talk) 15:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Is it just me or do the posts begin getting harder to read when dishonesty is afoot? SkylerLovefist (talk) 16:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Gotta have you put the brakes on that one...that IS something where one can cry WP:Personal and have a little bit of truth to it. The walls have ears, so you may wanna backtrack that last statement. Vjmlhds (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Noted. Sorted. Lol. SkylerLovefist (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Saw your last edit summary on the Impact roster page...I laughed so hard I almost choked to death on a piece of a donut I was eating. Somewhere out there, someone is saying "Almost..." Vmlhds (talk) 15:38, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Let this be a lesson, folks: don't eat donuts whole Wikipedia-ing. It's bad for your health. SkylerLovefist (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Sheldon Jean

Looked up a few things about him:

He wrestled in Border City Wrestling, which is Scott D'Amore's Canadian indy fed that Impact uses as a developmental, was on the Canadian version of Big Brother, wrestled on some Canadian Impact tapings in 2019 pre AXS, and wrestled in NOAH as well.

Looks like someone D'Amore would take a flier on, and he does outright call himself an Impact wrestler on his Twitter page, so I see no issues here.

Vjmlhds (talk) 03:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd wager a bet he's on the same type of deal Aiden Prince is on where he's a "developmental guy." I'd need some official confirmation but I feel like we're gonna see the same thing with a few of Scott's guys like what Bhupinder did where they're signed, but they stick around in Windsor and train for awhile before they go full-time with the main product. SkylerLovefist (talk) 05:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Raven

He had a cup of coffee with Impact, and he just got brought in to MLW (who just signed a national TV deal and are looking to grow), but if he's also still doing NWA on the side, then cheers to him. Vjmlhds (talk) 14:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Yeah man, I saw his name listed in the Powerrr credits as a producer. If you weren't aware... I don't blame ya. Powerrr is rather bad these days. SkylerLovefist (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

With the new TV deal, MLW has passed NWA at this point to be #4 (behind WWE, AEW, and Impact in that order). Don't have a chance to watch Powerrr, as it always skips my mind being an online only show (I'm an old fart who sticks to the tried and true model of watchin' rasslin' on TV). Vjmlhds (talk) 05:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

That's fair. I'm pretty much an Impact and occasionally MLW guy nowadays. I just check NWA out of curiosity more than anything. I'm lucky I just read the credits out of curiosity. Raven *was* meant to be a commentator on NWA USA and they used it as a selling point... only to use the same team as Powerrr. SkylerLovefist (talk) 07:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Nose Candy Empire

Nose Candy Empire?!?! Why whatever are you implying? You think Tony Khan wants us to say hello to his "little friend"? Are you saying he has a scar on his face? Seriously though, I laughed so hard I almost cried. Vjmlhds (talk) 04:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Let's just say that when CM Punk mentioned icing on Mindy's muffins, Tony was gutted "icing sugar" MEANT icing sugar. lol. SkylerLovefist (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 10:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Man, you guys REALLY don't like being told you're wrong, eh? SkylerLovefist (talk) 10:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SkylerLovefist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Right, first things first: I fail to see how it counts as a "sockpuppet" when I've been editing for what, 3 years, 4 years, I dunno, however long I've been editing. Either way. It's hardly a sockpuppet when I've never pertained not to be Damolisher. Moreover, while you can go "Oh yeah, but you've had WP:CIVIL issues before," that's irrelevant and I haven't had an incidents since... jeez, it's been awhile anyway. Additionally, that sockpuppet check was done out of bad faith from a user who has made a habit of continuously starting drama with me because I have frequently cited his own WP:OWN behaviour. He took off for five months, came back and started drama over a dead issue where I certainly had no problems with anybody else in that interval, then proceeded to get a "sockpuppet" check out of absolutely nowhere, again, purely out of spite. I've attempted to clean up my act since my original account and I feel it's unreasonable I've been removed because of one user with a WP:PERSONAL problem, who has at least 3 articles he's tried to WP:OWN and has tried undermining me with violations of WP:POINT. SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Even if there was something to the claims you are making, you are more arguing process than the merits of the underlying block. You only say that you aren't a sockpuppet- which every sockpuppet does. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Man, is there anybody on this website that doesn't gaslight people? I said "I fail to see how I'm a sockpuppet". My understanding is a sockpuppet is where you're a mask of some sort.SkylerLovefist (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Moreover, while you can go "Oh yeah, but you've had WP:CIVIL issues before," that's irrelevant and I haven't had an incidents since . . . I've attempted to clean up my act since my original account Not to gravedance, but this is patently untrue for the reasons I highlighted at the ANI report. — Czello ^(music) 09:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh, and PS: I like how the guy who has exclusively shown up to start drama with me twice in the last six months "Isn't the aggressor" and "hasn't stooped to my level." Even though I'm not the one nuking entire parts of articles without discussion. Or constantly exhibits WP:OWN behaviour. Or who started an ANI when I hadn't spoken to the guy since April and December prior to that. And who only filed that sockpuppet BS out of spite.

Then again I'm talking to a guy who can't work out that a photo of a wrestler standing in an Impact Wrestling ring with a belt with "NEVER" on it means Impact Wrestling recognises NEVER belts. SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

The fact that you still think that picture could be used as a source, even when I recall an admin telling you it's obviously not acceptable, shows you still don't get how WP:V works. And I'm not sure how that sockpuppet report can be "BS" when... you have engaged in sockpuppetry. — Czello ^(music) 08:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

The fact that you still can't wrap your head around both WP:Commonsense and the fact you still keep avoiding the fact that Addicted is all about bad faith is hilarious. You're not even remotely objective, homeslice. SkylerLovefist (talk) 09:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

It was explained to you at the time why WP:COMMONSENSE doesn't override WP:V, especially in that situation, by several different editors and even an admin. I know you're bitter about it, but the fact you're bringing it up after over a year and reviving this talk page discussion to do so really is telling. Just let it go. — Czello ^(music) 09:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Translation: "Much like the clear encapsulation of WP:OWN I keep making excuses for and ignoring the bad behaviour of, I don't like admitting I deliberately miss the obvious to make myself feel more important." Once again , you avoid addressing your homie's behaviour. Almost like you know you've got no actual justification. SkylerLovefist (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, Czello, how does this involve you in any way, shape or form? Mind your own business, thank you. Also, I get that you blatantly have a bias at this point, but I'm fairly certain that (once again) I'm not the one who showed back up to restart 6 month old drama which was finished followed by getting someone banned under a BS pretense after another 2 months. SkylerLovefist (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

• SkylerLovefist, you cannot edit under any account or IP while you have a blocked account. That is the reason for your block, and that is what you need to address specifically in order to appeal. You retain access to this talk page to appeal your block; if you continue to use it to express various grievances with other editors you will lose access to this page. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

  Ah, the continued gaslighting on this website never fail to amuse me. SkylerLovefist (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)