Smoulding
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Smoulding has not edited Wikipedia since 9 July 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome!
:) Dlohcierekim has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
AIV
editHi. It seems, your report to AIV did get that IP blocked [1]. Always nice to see that Wikpedia actually works in the way I pretend it does! By the way, I had trouble finding your report to AIV because you wrote it without logging in. You're of course absolutely free to do so but it's always more convenient to be able to follow contributions of registered users. Cheers and happy editing. Pascal.Tesson 22:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help Pascal! Kind regards. Steve
RE: Serial Vandal
editThank you for following up on that user. I saw where they were blocked, so it looks like you did well. Let's hope that they learn something from the block. Thanks again... --JFreeman (talk) 00:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Empty
editEmpty articles such as the vineyard stubs you have been creating are in fact very strongly deprecated. The problem is that by creating a blue link, they give a false impression that an article exists. It is far far better to leave the article unwritten - a red link highlights the need for an article and can be detected by "wanted article" listing bots. -- RHaworth 20:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Definitely second that. All of these will be deleted. When you actually have what to write, recreate it then. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 20:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
OK..point well taken. I'll create them as I have content to add. Thanks and apologies. Steve.Moulding 20:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
New Wine Discussion (by Agne) : Input Requested
editDear Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wine member:
There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wine#Vintage_Infos_.28part_II.29 that has become
Please add your comments/input to the talk page Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_is_not_a_wine_guide.
Thanks! Regards -- Steve.Moulding 17:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
editThank you for your interest in VandalProof, Smoulding! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: Your comments
editI apologize. I was not aware that I made any personal attacks. In fact, I am pretty sure I did not. If you interpreted my comments in that way, however, I am dearly sorry. I will be sure to review my comments more closely before posting them. dool325 00:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello
editThanks, I will try to help as much as I canCharleenmercedFile:SoleteRayosÑajo.gif 06:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced
Interested in working on some JoP articles?
editI don't think the opposers on the Judgement of Paris move have a grasp of how significant the wine tasting event was. Which is a fair consideration. I think it would probably be best to work on some of the relevant JoP articles with linkings to help convey it. I think it is clear that the scope of articles affected by the wine tasting event is much more then the mythology story and that is probably our best angle to help show our fellow Wikipedian that a disambig page is the best service to the reader. AgneCheese/Wine 20:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/The1uncle
editI don't know precisely what to do. The new articles look a little better, but they still seem a bit off to me. Some seem to be about real people and things, but they reference discogs a lot, which seems to be a less than reliable source (user created?). IronGargoyle 01:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Is it alright if I use you as an example?
editI've started the rough draft page for the newsletter and I wanted to use you as an example about sub-projects. Please take a look and let me know if this is alright. Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Newsletter. Thanks! AgneCheese/Wine 20:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Of course! Thankyou! I'll take a more detailed look at the newsletter tonight. -- Steve.Moulding 21:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Wine Project Newsletter
edit
 Issue I - February 18, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Thanks!
editHi! Just noticed that you reverted vandilism on my userpage earlier. Cheers! Will 20:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Wiki-Winos
editHey Steve! I was curious if you would be interested in participating in an upcoming Wiki-Winos feature for the Wine Project Newsletter. If you are, take a look at the Interview Questionnaire and feel free to answer any or all of the questions that you like. You might also consider dropping off a nominee for the next Wine Improvement Drive Article. Thanks! AgneCheese/Wine 19:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Carmenere
edit- I ordered about 10 different Carmeneres today from my Wine guy at the Liquor Store....Some will be here by Friday, can't wait. I will get the labels from those as well. I also ordered the Montgras, let me know! Oh and if you can get a picture of the label before I do, please upload itCharleenmerced Talk 05:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced
Wine Project Newsletter
edit|
Issue II - March 4th, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
I've been wanting to take the wineries off of there since I started working on the article a couple weeks ago. I agree that they aren't actually fitting in any one contribution other than they sell a good Zinfandel which is not appropriate for an encyclopedic article. Christopher Tanner, CCC 04:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)tanner-christopher
Wine Project Newsletter
edit|
Issue III - March 18, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter
edit|
Issue IV - April 1st, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter
edit
|
The Wine Project Newsletter! Issue V - April 15, 2007 |
|
| This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. If you have any Wikipedia wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Newsletter. |
Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
edit
Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 18:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Wine Project Newsletter
edit|
|
The Wine Project Newsletter! Issue VI - May 6th, 2007 |
|
In this edition:
|
| This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. If you have any Wikipedia wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Newsletter. |
Apologies to everyone for this notification being sent out so late, events in real life prevented me from distributing it at the time, and the Wine Project's had a bit of a lull during the Northern Hemsiphere summer. But as the nights draw in, activity should pick up again, and hopefully the next Newsletter will arrive a little more quickly....
The next few weeks are the perfect time to take photos of grapes in the Northern Hemisphere - get your cameras out! FlagSteward 16:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Wine Project activity
editThis is a friendly note to let you know that you have been moved to the Inactive members page of the Wine Project. Users are moved to this page when two months have passed without any Wikipedia activity or 3 months have passed without any contribution to a wine related article. The intent of the Participant list is to function as a resource for other editors wishing to get in contact with wine project members for comments or question on Wikipedia's wine article. The goal of this process is to try and maintain the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Participants as current and up to date as possible with active and contributing members. Please note that this is not intended to be a negative reflection on your Wikipedia or wine related contribution and it is well known that sometimes outside life can take editors away from Wikipedia for some time. You will always be welcomed to rejoined the Wine Project should you feel that the time is right. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk or on the Wine Project talk page. Best wishes. AgneCheese/Wine 00:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:BEAUCAILLOU.JPG
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:BEAUCAILLOU.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:1795none-01.JPG
edit
File:1795none-01.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:1795 Polushka.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:1795 Polushka.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:HAUTBAT.JPG
edit
Thanks for uploading File:HAUTBAT.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C) 21:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:PICHONBARON.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PICHONBARON.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:CANTENACBROWN.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CANTENACBROWN.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:StPierre.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StPierre.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:BRANAIRE-LABEL.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BRANAIRE-LABEL.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:OrmesDePez.JPG
edit
Thank you for uploading File:OrmesDePez.JPG.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
