User talk:Stephenb/Archive 5
 |
|---|
| 18 November 2024 |
Archives
editSignpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
edit |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
A vandal writes...
editThere were no attacks about Casey, it was something that we have been talking about to do. He actually enjoyed and approved of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bif513 (talk • contribs)
- That does not change the fact that the article was inappropriate, and it was right for you to receive a warning, even if the warning template did not match your situation, the article was nonsense, unnotable, and against Wikipedia policy. Aliasd 15:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Christmas Special
editI explained my edit on the talk page. December 2007 has been confirmed by the BBC here http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/news/cult/news/drwho/2007/07/02/46771.shtml. (I don't know how to format refs on Wiki so if you could let me know it would be appreciated). Kelpin 08:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
REgarding Goa
editDear Sir,
Sorry.. I am new on wikipedia.. editing.. but am wikipedia fan..
I thought i just added some useful content.. This are terms that most of the people search for.
So I thought of adding it.
Sorry sir if i caused any inconvenince.
Warm Regards from Kenneth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennethsilveira (talk • contribs)
Good morning Steven, I have been taking a look at the web page my son was creating and noticed the messages on my talk pages regading spam. I have been assured by my son that he has not been spamming your site but now having looked at your messages it seems to me that he has. I cannot tell you how disappointed i am with him and am pleased that you are on he ball with keeping the Wikipedia true and honest. I can only appologise on behalf of my son and would like to thank you in some way for your excellent work. Can you let me know how i can award you through the site. On another note, the nationalcycles Wikipedia site that was developed does look like a promotional site. How can we write a Wikipedia acceptable page without it looking like a promotion? Can you point me to another site that you feel is accetable? Thank you again Steven and well done. Regards
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
External links
editHi Stephenb. Please explain to me why you consider links to What's on TV spam, but links to tv.com, apparently, not.
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
List of Doctor Who serials
editWe now have a source for the production code: please don't revert while I add the cite. Cheers. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 09:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- It may stretch the definition of production code but if the BBC is happy enough to use it latterly, it'll do for the time being. That said, I've got my copy of producer Phil Segal's book on me, so I might see if there's something more official in there. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 09:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
editApologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the misunderstanding
edit- I removed the page intentionaly because it exist elsewhere under - Warriors of Kudlak
thanks --Wiggstar69 15:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, brilliant, thanks for that, i'll learn how to redirect a page for the future.--Wiggstar69 15:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Jingby
editPlease, stop vandalization of National Liberation War of Macedonia! Jingby 11:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I can't stop it myself, I can only revert what looks like vandalization and/or report vandals Stephenb (Talk) 11:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the spelling check of National Liberation War of Macedonia. Your input is valuable as a native speaker. Lantonov 09:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Dickens
editadmin.
editHey. Based on your track record here, I was wondering if you would consider adminship at WP:RFA. I'd certainly nominate you if you're willing to take the plunge, I just have to go through your history and make sure everything's good. Let me know of your decision. Wizardman 21:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 33 | 13 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 21:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 34 | 20 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
RapiTime
editStephen, I notice that you have requested deletion for the new "RapiTime" page. I understand why you have done it. However, please could you advise on what I should really do here.
There has been a tidy up on the page "Performance_analysis" where many external links were replaced with internal links to each tool. All I did was create a (hopefully semi-technical) page to fill the blank.
To be honest, I don't particularly want a wikipedia on RapiTime, but deleting _both_ the external link and disallowing the article seems odd.
Let me know what we should do. Thanks Ian —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ianb1469 (talk • contribs) 09:33, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
- I can only suggest you create the article such that it sounds less like an advertisement for the product! It's possible that the product isn't notable enough to be an article, too, of course. Stephenb (Talk) 09:49, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I am trying to edit the BACN page to reflect a second entry, aside from the military term, BACN. Could you please let me know what I can do to make this change without having the change overwritten by your bot? I do not want to remove the BACN entry that is already there. I just want to add a disambiguation page, then create a second page for another meaning of bacn. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seriozha (talk • contribs) 12:10, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
I read your comment about bacn and wikipedia not being a dictionary. I appreciate the pointer to the wikipedia guidelines. I heard about this other meaning of bacn online and saw a few references to it, as well as a story about how it got started. I think that is enough information to warrant a page on wikipedia. I had just placed the definition there as a placeholder. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seriozha (talk • contribs) 20:06, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi. You're the original nominator of what was then a horrendous mess of unsourced material, POV and lack of comprehensible notability claims. Since then, the debate has moved on considerably. Furthermore (more importantly) a few editors have radically overhauled the article, including removing POV, and providing reliably sourced clear notability claims. I wonder if you'd review your implied "delete" opinion (by virtue of being nominator). I genuinely believe this to be notable and thanks in advance for reconsidering, even if you retain your opinion that it should be deleted. --Dweller 20:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Torchwood Series 2
editOn the Torchwood episode listings page, how much of it is confirmed and how much of it is made up? I'm trying to find sources for a lot of the things on the page with much failure. I've deleted the episode names that are clearly OR. --Wiggstar69 19:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
edit
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 05:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
gay
edityour gay !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
ass hole —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davster111 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- How witty and clever. Stephenb (Talk) 10:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 37 | 10 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 38 | 17 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
hey!
editErr yeah I need a bit of help.
At the moment I'm browsing the Recent Changes log and reverting vandalism, I keep reading that I should sign in the comment box with the 4 tildes Marcbaldwin27 11:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC) but everytime i do and check the comment box I look really stupid as it ust shows up as Marcbaldwin27 11:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC). Is this because I haven't made a sig yet?
Cheers mate
Thanks!
editThank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Gillyweed 07:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Trout Unlimited
editHey Stephen -
The logo is the national logo for the non-profit organization Trout Unlimited, not the logo for their magazine, which is just called "Trout."
I didn't see a non-profit logo fair use exception, but I know there is one (I'm a lawyer). If you know of a way to make that section make more sense, please feel free to change it.
Thank you,
Zach Matthews —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZachMatthews (talk • contribs) 13:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
hola!
editSorry man, but I didnt edit that page... and yes, This IP is the IP of the company where I work. I have an account but it's in es.wikipedia.org, I'm Peruvian.
WilL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.60.156.106 (talk) 18:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
A vandal writes...
editYOUR GAY MAN —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewthejesus (talk • contribs) 13:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- That should be "You are" or "you're". Please spell your vandalism correctly. Also, capitals are so pre-school. Finally, I'd recommend a comma before "man" for grammatical satisfaction. Unless you are talking about a gay man you think I own, of course, in which case I apologise profusely (but what man?). Stephenb (Talk) 13:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- As the word "Gay" is ambiguous, I would also suggest substituting it for "Homosexual" or "Delightful", depending on your meaning. A possible correct interpretation of your line (which may be wrong) is: "You're delightful, Stephenb." I hope this helps to clarify your message, regards, aliasd·U·T 14:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I find interpreting vandalism rather tricky these days. CapitaliZAtion goes out the Winda. Clicheys are mispelted. And punctuation: is, passe? I am delighted that some wordsmiths still care. Gillyweed 20:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
edit |
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
You actually DIDN'T revert it back, I reloaded the page again and again after I was chastised for "vandalism" and still found that "Christmas is an anal holiday celebrating the birth of Alexander" the "vandalism" I did was to remove "scrubs rules!" from it. Then I finally got it back to "Christmas is an annual holiday celebrating the birth of Jesus".
I dunno if it was you or what's-his-name that accused me of vandalism, but you're both wrong and I was trying to fix it, and from what I saw on the page, I'm the only one who actually removed any vandalism at all!
Now I've got a bloody warning for fuckall. I didn't see anything I did that got a negative effect, except that I didn't edit it in the text window, because I was trying to do it quickly but didn't realise how much the article had been vandalised.
What the hell mate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsmccohen (talk • contribs) 10:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
apology from dsmccohen
editI apologise for yelling at you. It turns out you were not the one who chastised me for vandalism. I will redirect that immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsmccohen (talk • contribs) 10:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
why should I?
editwhy i like aqua and you should learn how to spell color!
RE: User:SueBrewer
editPlease see: Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets#User:HarveyCarter
Please leave input there. Thanks, IP4240207xx 20:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Sergio cassiano speedy deleted under CSD G12
editJust wanted to let you now that with article such as the above, which cut and pasted text from a clearly copyrighted source with no changes and no assertion of permission, there's no need to list it as a {{copyvio}}; just tag it for speedy deletion using {{db-copyvio}}. By the way, when you do list a page using {{copyvio}}, you then have to take the next stip of listing the tagging at that day's copyright violation page (today's is here). Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit 15:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for that! Stephenb (Talk) 18:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Notability of the Andrew_coulter_enright article
editStephen,
I have a question about a tag you placed on Andrew coulter enright (apologies for the capitalization error--will rectify that as soon as I have a "move" button). You've tagged it for notability two times. First I thought it was tagged because it didn't meet the sources[1] requirement, but it appears that you had another criterion in mind. Can you elaborate on why you feel that this article might not satisfy notability?
Cheers
John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwriccardi (talk • contribs)
- Hmm, hadn't realised I'd tagged it twice! Just reading the article he didn't appear to be very notable, but given that even students are getting articles these days, feel free to delete the tag. Stephenb (Talk) 08:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwriccardi (talk • contribs) 12:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Top Gear
editThe hyphen is there as other names have already been used and the closest way to revert was to use the hyphen. I dislike this name but dislike the unilateral nature of the previous name change even more, also I prefer the first page names which were Top Gear (current format) and Top Gear (original Format).--Lucy-marie 13:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
edit |
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 40 | 1 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Speedy deletion?
editCan i please ask for you to revert the removal of my article on Alex Humungus Hawton.I have given reasons for the purpose of approval for reinstation. Colin9 11:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC) colin9
- Already deleted. Stephenb (Talk) 11:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 42 | 15 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Sad, isnt it
editit really is sad that the beaurocratic processes (such as the rubbish speedy deletetion for unveriability) have ruined the very thing that wikipedia set out to become. an innocent user has no right to right a legitimate articleof worth to many, which is truly sad. you and every other "patroller", etc should be ashamed of what you have done to wikipedia. feel free to contact me if you disagree with any of my allegations.
Designdonkey 11:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- You have every right to build a legitimate article, and could have done so despite my speedy deletion tag (which was just my opinion, and therefore worth just as much as anyone else's, although obviously at least one admin agreed with me!). Adding the {{hangon}} tag and adding a genuine reason for keeping the article would have been a start. But, like many others, you just jump in without any thought to what a good article should contain first. Wikipedia needs patrollers to keep out the vandals, but it can also be a learning experience for people editing with good faith when they add content they have not fully thought through, in your case not indicated any noteworthyness of your company. Stephenb (Talk) 14:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
peer review
editI was wondering if you would review my article. I am a new user on wikipedia and would like people to review my article to help me make it better. I just wrote the article national dairy checkoff. I found you to review because I saw that you have made changes to related articles. Thank you for your help. (Bakekari 14:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC))
Doctor Who revert
editStephen, please don't use TWINKLE or other automatic reverting mechanisms for good-faith edits. Tony Sidaway's edit to List of Doctor Who serials was made in good faith, and should not be labeled as vandalism. You may disagree in equally good faith, but using TWINKLE to label an edit you disagree with as vandalism is inappropriate. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I apologised immediately to Tony Sidaway for that - I inadvertently hit the mouse button; I was going to undo the edit with an appropriate comment. Sorry for any confusion. Stephenb (Talk) 17:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, good — I should probably have checked your contribs before rebuking you. Sorry about that! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
You probably realise this already, but just to observe the formalities:
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Doctor Who serials. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks, I'm not planning to revert again. However, it makes it difficult when new and anon editors keep making the same change without reading the discussion - this leaves the article in an inconsistent, or plain wrong, state. Especially frustrating when certain editors keep making statements of belief without proof, meaning that consensus is unlikely to be reached. Stephenb (Talk) 19:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 43 | 22 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 44 | 29 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Spurs away support
editAre you upset that I spoke the truth? I would like/appreciate it if you look into the 1.4million spurs fans comment and consider removing it until that statement can be supported. If you truely believe in the quality of the tottenham hotspur page then lets see it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.28.48 (talk) 11:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
G7th
editDear Sir, I really do not know the reason why you deleted the "G7th". I bought a capo last few weeks and tried to find some more information about that company. I can't find anything about it in the Wikipedia. But after www the musical instrument forums in the internet, I find that it is quite famous now and many people are talking about it. If you do not believe that, please search it in the forums and have a look yourself. I just want to open a new title and let others to add more information about the capos in it. Yours sincerely, Tommyko --Tommyko 17:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have no idea what a "capo" is, nor heard of the compnay, but simply adding information about a company on Wikipedia without adding enough information in the article to indicate why it is notable enough to have an article means that it is a candidate for deletion. I only nominated it for deletion - it was up to an administrator to determine whether they accepted the nomination or whether it did not deserve it - in this case, the administrator agreed with my nomination. There are processes for this kind of thing - I suggest you read the links on your Talk page. Stephenb (Talk) 09:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Stephenb,
Do you mean that you do not accept anything that you do not have any idea in the Wikipedia? Let me tell you - Capo is something that a guitarist must have. There are hundreds different capos in the world. The capos that I wanted to talk is a "Guitarist Magazine Gold Award" products. It is with patented wrap-spring clutch mechanism design. When I search "capo" in the Wikipedia, I find that many other brand names like "Shubb", "Kyser", " Woody's G Band" and "The Third Hand Capo" are mentioned. Some of them are with photos and linked to their company website. Actually, my article is very close to the article named "Shubb". Can you tell me the reason why Wikipedia can accept that article? I am new on Wikipedia and that one is my first article, so it is a little bit simple, I just want to start a article for others to continue. Sorry for wasting your time. --Tommyko (talk) 08:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the apology. Please read my reply before telling me what a "capo" is: that wasn't the reason I nominated the article. Again, I suggest you also read the links on your talk page carefully. Stephenb (Talk) 09:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 45 | 5 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 46 | 12 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
You Britsh is al the same.
editAllways walking over other pepole and other parts of the world. And no Im not Britsh Im from Iceland. So I am not native specker in english. The Tramp 16:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Be civil, please Stephenb (Talk) 16:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Sovereignty of the Falkland Islands
editYour input was appreciated and probably quite timely. Thank you. Justin talk 13:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank You
editHi Stephen, I saw that oops in Raymond E. Foster LOL. Thanks for dropping by, I really appreciated your interest in promoting Wikipedia content more professional. Thanks. --Cyril Thomas (talk) 12:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Special Barnstar
edit
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| Dear Stephen, you deserve this barnstar/award for your dedication to Wikipedia and keeping the content professional. Thank you for your edits and contributions, your efforts are greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
--Cyril Thomas (talk) 12:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- I blush. I have already thanked you on your talk page, but thanks here, too! Stephenb (Talk) 12:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
RE: Canceling User Edit of R5HUL
editI just wanted to say that if you check the records of Brian Meehan, it did say before that he performed an act of sexual nature on another highly respectable site. So, i do not understand why the changes I made were deleted. Also, another one of my articles, Christopher Meehan, was about a young man, who is related to Brian Meehan and I thouhgt it would be correct to add an article on him for other "Wikiusers" to see and talk about. Please could reply to my letter. Many thanks Rahul. —Preceding unsigned comment added by R5hul (talk • contribs) 11:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- "he performed an act of sexual nature on another highly respectable site" did he? lol! I reverted your changes because you had vandalised Charles Dickens and because you did not cite your changes to Brian Meehan. Stephenb (Talk) 12:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Humourous
editSo am I, there is more than one way to spell it correctly in British-English see [[1]] Mighty Antar (talk) 10:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Yawn, we could debate this interminably suggest you check the Oxford English Dictionary where you will find it is a perfectly correct spelling alongside other alternatives such as humorous, humerous and humurous. Look in most English Usage books and you'll find they don't even bother to include the debate. If you check back you will even find it wasn't redlinked before your unwarranted edit. Suggest you go back and revert your equally incorrect edit at the dictionary page. Mighty Antar (talk) 11:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing out American and British English spelling differences as well as User:Roger Davies/Sandbox1 and the discussion at User talk:Spellmaster. If you take the trouble to read the two discussions you have pointed to rather than continuing your rather objectionable pedandtic dismissal of any alternative viewpoint on the matter you will see that I am correct in my original assertion and that you are wrong. There is more than one way to spell the word and I am unaware of any consensus to state that your suggestion is any more correct than the innocent word that was there to begin with. Mighty Antar (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you really take the trouble to read those articles, you will realise you are, in fact, wrong. I don't think you've actually read them have you? Or, if you have, you are attempting to wind me up! As it is, I will leave it there. Stephenb (Talk) 19:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
page on Jamie Duce
editI have not been able to finish the article, please do not delete it, has i have not had time to finish the article. I would like some assistance in creating it thought.
Please message me in mail or via email or SMS messages
~Neko~
neko452@shaw.ca (email)
groove.electric@hotmail.com (MSN)
+1 403 563 4007 SMS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nekoduce (talk • contribs) 21:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Covered
editAppologies if i have not followed wiki procedure im a little newbee, but i reinstated the change you made you did not read the differing meanings
BECAUSE :-
You redirected Covered to cover page. The Coverd meanining is significantly diferent from the Cover and cover version page as to warant a seperate ref as i origionally posted with a link from Covered to cover. This was NOT vandalism only the wisdom of 35 years of record collecting !!!!!!!!!! Please do not revoke ths change
RobD —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ididnotthrilljfk (talk • contribs) 23:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Quotation marks - British style
editHi, it actually does not matter whether a sentence ends ." or ". because both are used in British English and are correct.--Svetovid (talk) 18:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Berkshire WikiProject invitation
edit| Hello, Stephenb/Archive 5! I'd like to invite you to join the Berkshire WikiProject. It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Berkshire-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of members.
|
Voyage of the Damned
editWell, actually, she did stare quite a bit... :P Thanks for picking that up - gotta love typos... TheIslander 01:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
DJ F.R.A.N.K
editHi there,
DJ Frank is not an London DJ, it is possible that there are two the same names, but the single of Danzel ( he is from belgium ) is together with F.R.A.N.K.
I edited the page, but you revert back to the other one. Please correct or check facts please.
Greetings, Thomas
DJ F.R.A.N.K
editHi there,
DJ Frank is not an London DJ, it is possible that there are two the same names, but the single of Danzel ( he is from belgium ) is together with F.R.A.N.K.
I edited the page, but you revert back to the other one. Please correct or check facts please.
Greetings, Thomas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.219.175.224 (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Echo Beach
editSorry but I have just found this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Echo_Beach_%28TV_series%29&action=history
which means my article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Echo_Beach_%28soap_opera%29
is a duplicate.
Unfortunately the reason for this is not of my making - Typing "Echo Beach" in the wiki search engine takes you straight to here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echo_Beach
Therefore, as multiple references to the phrase "Echo Beach" now exist the default page should be changed to prompt the user to select which one?? - not sure exactly how this is done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LostOnTheRiver (talk • contribs) 23:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks - I've redirected your article using #redirect [[Echo Beach (TV series)]] Stephenb (Talk) 08:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Ice hotel
editNo problem. When you're editing an article at about the same time as someone else, it's easy for things like that to happen. Thanks for the note on my talk page, though. Doczilla (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
BBC (Website) editing
editThanks for the correction on BBC page - indeed the section should have been on BBC Website page. I have moved it as such.
On the BBC Website page, the references are mangled, some are numbered, and others are bulleted. (This was the way before my changes as well). Might you have a suggestion on how to fix it? Thx. --MichaelClair
- The numbered entries are <ref>s; the others are simply URLs that are listed as external references. Not ideal, I agree, but I'm not sure what to do about it. Stephenb (Talk) 17:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
British English, football articles, and general consensus
editHi,
Take a look at Rangers F.C.. Or Arsenal F.C.. Or Chelsea F.C.. (Those two are FA status.) Notice how both the proper noun (the team name) and the terms "team" and "club" are treated as plurals throughout. The Spurs article, by contrast, jumps between the singular and plural throughout. (Check the article body; a half-dozen instances of "they", "are" or "have" in present tense, spread throughout.)
As far as team sports (and bands, for that matter) go, UK English universally prefers the plural. The singular may occasionally fail to look out of place, but the plural is definitely preferred. The authorities, though they don't actually defend the practice, at least point it out. And this is acceptable in formal use too.
So anyway, yeah, I reckon my edit was correct. If you disagree, I'm not going to revert it, but most other UK footy articles use the plural form for teams and it makes the Spurs article inconsistent. Chris Cunningham (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've replied over at my talk (sorry, I always find it awkward posting replies in places other than under the points they're addressing), but at the very least I reckon this warrants bringing up on the project board. I didn't realise how widespread the problem (such as it is) was. Chris Cunningham (talk) 00:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've replied to you there, but I agree, it would be good to clear it up in all the articles consistently! Stephenb (Talk) 00:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Replied on mine, but let's take it here in future. Chris Cunningham (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Affinion Group
editHi I was scammed by these people through avon.com under the affinion group entry.
I noticed someone is suspiciously undoing reversions changes to flatter the company and erase the BBB fraud incident information and reference list.
I was hoping you could fix it again as I have no idea how to use twinkle or undo these changes.
Thanks for your hard work. :)
- I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about... Any particular article? Stephenb (Talk) 21:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
deleted article
editYep I was trying to figure out how to ask for its deletion as well. Of course it's not my article. It IS complete garbage, which I saw after correcting the spelling of the title! Sandman30s (talk) 13:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
WELCOME!!!
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Sarcasm
editI suspected you were in need of a subtle but slightly amusing knock on the head, as you were letting a a petty dispute over episode titles and numbers get the better of you. - SaxonUnit (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Instead, assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
- At what point have I not assumed good faith? Stephenb (Talk) 21:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
You seem to very antagonistic towards me. This is against Wiki policy. But seriously if you're tired. Get some rest. Have a lie down. Hope you feel better soon. - SaxonUnit (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Starburst-cvr.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Starburst-cvr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Declining speedy tags
editWould you mind explaining which article you are referring to? I have spent several hours today working on CSD and if someone's going to call me names for the effort I'm making, it'd be nice to know specifically what aspect of my work has enraged them. A diff would be perfect, thanks. --Dweller (talk) 14:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Erm, I'm sure it was you that called me "most annoying" and "very unpolite", both of which reveal you to be somewhat heated and certainly not complimenting me. I asked for clarity for two reasons, first because the edit summary does not say what you said it would and second because I could not understand why anyone would post such a message when I went to considerable trouble to post at the talk page of not just the tagger, but also someone who in good faith replaced the inappropriate tag, and have subsequently posted at length on the latter's talk page explaining how the speedy criteria differ from the AfD criteria. ([2]) --Dweller (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm certainly not heated, but otherwise you're correct, I'm not complimenting you, though I have not called you any "names". I also have no problem with you asking for the diff. You went to a great deal of trouble but forgot that it is the article history that ought to show why the speedy nom was deleted for the benefit of other editors (such as myself). I was simply reminding you of that. I see no further point in continuing this conversation. Stephenb (Talk) 15:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps this conversation could have begun on the right foot if you'd dropped me a message suggesting that I might have forgotten to do something, rather than beginning with a whole bunch of unnecessary unpleasantness. I might even have conceded you were right. Let's start again, shall we, right below? --Dweller (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Hmmm. You may have a point. The article is so far short of falling foul of A7, I kind of shortcut the decline message while hastening off to help the taggers understand why it's not speediable. I usually use a "contains an assertion of notability" or some similar edit summary. Good spot and thanks. --Dweller (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've seen several noms declined where that has happened, and thought I'd take the time and trouble to tell you, because it can be most annoying and considered somewhat unpolite when that happens, though I accept it was done this time in good faith and was a simple forgetful mistake. Lucky no-one was unnecessarily unpleasant or took reminders (in the form of a generalised complaint about this sort of thing happening) as being an attack on them, eh? :) Stephenb (Talk) 15:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- As if?! --Dweller (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Courtney Love
editHey Stephen,
I've been to London and The Isle of White, but not Newbury.
I live in Los Angeles. The weather's good (that's about all it's good for).
Please check out these websites
www.cobaincase.com
and
www. justiceforkurt.com
I believe Kurt was murdered.
But don't take my word for it, check out the websites.
All The Best,
Paul Timmons —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.43.227 (talk • contribs)
- Fine, but what you believe must be substantiated on by references when changing articles, Points of view are not appropriate without citations. You were changing the article to disrupt its structure and introduce inappropriate beliefs and material irrelevant to the subject. Please don't do that. Stephenb (Talk) 09:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Torchwood magazine
editSorry about the revert - I had my dates mixed up. My bad StuartDD contributions 21:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Terry Pratchett FA nomination
edit
Terry Pratchett has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.
Sent it to a 'review' by mistake! I'll submit it later today - I'll check all the links first, seems wise. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's not been much discussion I know, but I thought what the heck- I've nominated it, lets see what feedback they give. I'm interested in what they say about the sub articles. I think it can get, with their advice, to FA. --Matt Lewis (talk) 14:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
edit| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)