User talk:SuperHamster/Archive/1

Archive 1 Happy Thanksgiving!

SuperHamster is Around Userpage - Talkpage - Contributions - Email - Guestbook

SuperHamster's Talk Page (Archive 1) This is Archive 1 of SuperHamster's talk page. It contains old discussions that are no longer active. Archive 1 contains discussions 1-100, ranging from 30 September 2008 to 27 June 2010. Please do not edit the contents of this page If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on my current talk page. Thanks.

Welcome!

Hello, SuperHamster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ism schism (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Okie dokes...even though I already have seen that ten times and pretty much know all of that :P Thanks. SuperHamster (talk) 21:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/October 2008#SuperHamster. SoxBot X (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Twin Skies

I have nominated Twin Skies, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Skies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio

Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot (Disable) 04:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hello SuperHamster, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, SuperHamster. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles from deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<. Ikip (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for my second Barnstar! Cheers Kyle1278 02:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio

Thanks! --Rkitko ^(talk) 23:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Biographies of notable individuals

Per your suggestion here [1], I have begun working on the article here: User:ChildofMidnight/SuperHamster's Dad. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, you shouldn't have =) But since you've already got it under way...SuperHamster _{Talk Contribs} 16:49, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!

Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:

• T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
• WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
• WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
• WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
• WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 02:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Tagging attacks

Hi. Where a page is a personal attack, like Alfie Munkenback just now, the thing to do is not tag it as vandalism, but blank it and replace it with {{db-atk}}. That puts it in a high-priority queue for admin attention, prevents people reading it in the meantime, and gives you a suitably fierce warning for the author's talk page. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out, I'll make sure to do that next time. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry!

Sorry about the signature, im trying to figure out how to add color and make my own signature but it dose not seem to be working. -- Dwayneflanders (Talk) 00:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

LOL!

Oh, I dunno...I suppose I could dust it off and put it up somewhere.  :)) Thank you (blush). PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

Hey, SuperHamster. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- Vatsan34 (talk) 15:31, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much =) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:33, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Happy b-day BennyK95 (talk) 03:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Video games!!!

Just thought I'd make you feel welcome :)

MystifiableUnknown (talk) 05:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 13:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Invitation for the typeface collaboration

Requesting editors' help There is currently an oppened collaboration which aims in improving articles related to typefaces and font categorization. If you´re interested in this subject, please visit the collaboration page, add your self and see how you can help.

I hope you can contribute in this section. Happy editings and happy second day after your birthday! - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 01:55, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Archive Note: This comment was replied to here.

Alot in common

As i am reading your user page, i see you and me have alot in common. Your birthday is a week after mines. We are both around the age of 14. We are both interested in the same things.-- Dwayneflanders (talk) 00:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I have also noticed that. It's nice to see another young user getting active in Wikipedia at an early age. I also noticed you have taken a liking in my userpage ;) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Article Move Response

Right, thanks for that. I was a little sketchy on how to create pages related to my user page. I've got it now though.--Jakkinx (talk) 01:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Article for Deletion

Yo, SuperHamster. I realized you put my article, The Michael and Steven Show, up for deletion. What the heck! I'm just trying to get the show out to people so when it shows up, people can WATCH IT! What is wrong with that??? I bet you ain't watching The Michael and Steven Show. MJandST2926 20:28, 1 November 2009 (UTC) MJandST2926 —Preceding unsigned comment added by MJandST2926 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Archive Note: This comment was replied to here.

Hey, I understand now. I didn't mean to be so harsh. I guess The Michael and Steven Show isn't pretty important after all. Would it be considered after I put it online? MJandST2926 20:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC) MJandST2926 —Preceding unsigned comment added by MJandST2926 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Archive Note: This comment was in reply to this message.

That's all right. Once uploaded, unfortunately the article would probably still be deleted per the same reasons. If all the videos on YouTube had their own article, it'd be quite a mess. Even the most popular videos, such as the Evolution of Dance, don't have their own articles. Their creators sometimes do, such as Ryan Higa and Sean Fujiyoshi (nigahiga) and Smosh, but once again these are very popular users who have been active for a long while. One of the best things to do is wait until someone else creates and article about you/what you've created. Having someone else think you're notable enough for an article is safer than creating one about yourself. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

That does make A LOT more sense. When you're 11, you just don't get much about this kind of stuff. But, thanks to you, I understand that someone putting up an article about The Michael and Steven Show would be better than me putting it up myself. Thanks a lot! MJandST2926 21:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)MJandST2926 —Preceding unsigned comment added by MJandST2926 (talk • contribs)

Farmville Cut

Please explane to me how the lists of information are detrimental to the Wikipedia community. As it seams to me that the information that you carelessly deleted can help any one playing that game. Each list is rather short and adequate description is placed before each one, to help viewers. VadimKorolyov 11/8/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vadimkorolyov (talk • contribs) 02:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I have removed the lists of items from the FarmVille article, as Wikipedia is not a game guide. As you said, the lists help anyone playing the game. However, Wikipedia articles are meant to inform readers on what a certain subject is about, not how to use it/play it. A reader who simply wants to read what Farmville is about would find no use to these lists. For a bit more info on this, please see this page for basic info on what Wikipedia is not guide-wise and see this page for info on what should and should not go into video game articles. If you have any other questions, please feel free to add them here. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Well I don't agree with those rules, but you are just respecting them. So I created a blog with the information and added it to external links. VadimKorolyov 11/8/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vadimkorolyov (talk • contribs) 02:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

When I first started editing, I didn't exactly like those guidelines either. After a while though, I came to understanding them. But anyways, thanks for adding the link to the article. Unfortunatly, that link may also eventually be removed. I won't remove it, as I don't see much of a problem and you have good intentions. However, it may fall under links to normally be avoided, specifically numbers 11, and, once again, it doesn't provide encyclopedic content. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello again. Unfortunately, I have removed the external link you added to the FarmVille article. Generally, external links to blogs are not allowed, and once again, it provides no encyclopedic content. Please don't take this personally. I hate to pester you with all these repetitive links and guidelines, but for more info, please see links to normally be avoided and the external links guidelines for video games. Thank you for your edits and I hope you continue to help out the project. Once again, please feel free to discuss this with me by replying here or on my talk page (I'll be watching both). Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I have requested a third party.--Vadimkorolyov (talk) 04:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the heads up. Just to let you know, I'm going to bed now so won't be available for the next few hours. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Third opinion: SuperHamster is right. That link is a violation of WP:ELNO #11: "Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority" and as such, it does not belong in the Farmville article. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Did you visit the link? Not worth my time. Removing 2 other links on that page that fall under the same rule.Vadimkorolyov (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Priorities

Importance "low"? Are you freaking crazy??? :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Sour cream doughnuts sound disgusting! I'm saving space in the higher importance levels for much better tasting, more important doughnuts. ;) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 11:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Park Vista

Unless you go to Park Vista and know the principle and what everyone calls him and he is known for I suggest stop being an retard and thinking your right reverting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.167.213 (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Then please add a reliable source stating so. Original reasearch is not accepted in Wikipedia, especially when it is dealing with controversial content about a living person. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

FarmVille

Do you think protection is working out OK? --Stephen 23:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

I think it's justified, based on the many recent vandalism, spamming, and other ya-da-ya-da. But looking at the history and talk page, most of the content is added and updated by new users. So I'm thinking it might be best to unblock early and hope that more constructive edits than unconstructive edits turn out. Otherwise, I don't think the page will be updated much. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Square milk jugs

I had to fight long and hard to keep content in the article about the dangers of this newfangled invention. Some POV editors advocated change and progress without even considering the risks involved! ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Ay. They apparently have never gone through a week of drinking from a container with such dramatic side-effects and safety technicalities involved. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Mandazi

On November 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mandazi, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 01:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Congrats. It's a good article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Midnight ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Caught me red-handed

Sowwy :3 161.253.121.175 (talk) 06:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Are you in?

Are you competing in the Bacon Challenge?--Sky Attacker the legend reborn... 02:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Yep, I decided I'll give it a shot. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:19, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Cool. Would you like to be identified as American or Iranian?--Sky Attacker the legend reborn... 02:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmm...American would be good, as I was born here. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Points.

Have you started anything for the Bacon Challenge already? Report it [[2]] to get your first points. I'll fill in the points table section later once several reports have been made. --Sky Attacker the legend reborn... 18:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Great News!!!

Bacon materializer

Unable to resist bacon's temptations, rogue editors have kicked off the Bacon Challenge 2010 before the New Year even starts! This is a fun and collegial event and all are welcome. There are many non-pork articles for editors who enjoy some sizzle, but object to or don't like messing with pig products. This year's event includes a Bacon WikiCup 2010 for those who may want to keep score and enjoy engaging in friendly competition. Given the critical importance of this subject matter, I know you will want to participate, so remember to sign up today and get started A.S.A.P. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

thanks for the message

I'll try to add my signature more often. And thank your for telling me about the reference desk. In truth, I thought the article focused to much on evolution, but didn't really say much in terms of natural predators, habits, etc. I was hoping the mysterious flamingo experts would take a hint and add things like that to the article. Maybe there is a better way for me to suggest such a thing? ha ha I also am trying to figure out how to add references, but I can't seem to figure out the instructions provided...tragic. Nishanoire (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Yep, no problem. I also did notice that upon looking at the page; it is quite odd that information like the isn't readily available in the article, especially for such a popular subject. You can always suggest it on the talk page. Who knows, I may expand the article a little as soon as I have time. As for references, it isn't too hard once you get the hang of it. To really help you out and make it easier, you can go to "my preferences" by clicking on the link in the upper right, then click on "Gadgets" (the last link in the tabs list), and finally enable the tool called refTools. It will add a button to the edit bar, which makes adding references easy by making a form where you simply fill out all the information (URL, author, date, etc.). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You can also alwaysdo it manually. Since you seem to be wanting to cite a website, you can just fill out the below template with the proper information and add it to the article (not all information spaces need to be filled out; URL, title, and publisher should be just fine). Also, references are added after sentences in the article itself, not in the references section at the bottom of the article. The references added throughout the article are automatically linked to at the bottom.

<ref>{{cite web |url= |title= |author= |date= |work= |publisher= |accessdate=2009-12-08}}</ref> ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah! I see, thanks! Someone else used the same source, so I'm happy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishanoire (talk • contribs) 03:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Good job!

You now have a mark on the scoreboard. Not only that, you are the first and only participant so far to score in the copy-editing category. Also, thanks for catching that typo on the WikiCup page. Cheers.--Sky Attacker the legend reborn... 04:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and no problem. I'll try to make some more content-ful contributions when I've got more time. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

If you're willing to take the reins on the WikiBacon Cup for a while that would be great SuperHamster. I'm glad that SkyAttacker seems to be okay. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. Take care and enjoy yourself. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:52, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and you too =) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Karen Franklin

Please can you post the content into my userspace so i can ifx it up and re-post it. It took me about 2hrs to do the citations and everything, now it's gone.Andrewjlockley (talk) 01:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I cannot restore deleted content, as I am not an administrator. You will need to ask an admin. The user who deleted Karen Franklin was 2over0, so you can ask them on their talkpage. However, I'd like to advise you that the topic you want to write about may not meet the notability guidelines for people. You may want to read the guidelines for notability pertaining to what Karen Franklin specializes in. If you still feel that Franklin would be notable enough, you can go ahead and work on it again after the page is restored to your userpace. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

The Great Wikipedia Dramaout

Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou

Thanks for the heads up about the edit warring "report". I wonder if I can get your uninvolved opinion? I've no interest in bringing the dispute here but I'm considering an ANI or WQA report on the IP. In a dispute in which I wasn't involved, I would have done it by now but, in your opinion, does that make me look like I'm filing a retaliatory report or do I have a case? Thanks in advance, HJMitchell You rang? 20:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Trying to look at the situation neutrally, I believe both of you are equally liable for the edit war. After the first reversion, the situation should have been discussed without either of you undoing each other's edits during the period. If you hadn't reverted 86.12.24.209's edits numerous times, then I believe a report would be plausible due to 86.12.24.209 acting out and not explaining their edits very well, even though their original edit was constructive. But because of reverting each other's edits with no constructive discussion, I believe you are both at fault. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice. I'll take it into consideration before I decide what to do. Any idea how long it might take for an admin to process the EW report? HJMitchell You rang? 21:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Shouldn't take long, the dispute isn't complicated. Maybe a few more minutes, maybe an hour, depends on who's online. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:14, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Editor Review: done

I have done an editor review for you at Wikipedia:Editor review/SuperHamster/Archive/1. Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc). The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated! If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on. I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it. Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:10, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Archive Note: This comment was replied to here.

Bacon thanks you

Thanks for taking up the scoring duties. Bacon thanks you...Geoff ^{Who, me?} 17:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

It is the bacon that should receive the thanks, otherwise I wouldn't have such a delicious subject to take over scoring duties with. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Good job, but I don't know what you have done to the notes numbering, they don't tie up any more with the person they are supposed to relate to. I'm a "him" by the way, not a "her". SpinningSpark 22:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Ahh, sorry about that, and thanks for pointing that out. Looks like I changed the first set of numbers to match in the table, but forgot to change the numbers appearing below the table. It was around 11 PM or so that night so my mind wasn't in its sharpest condition ;) I'll fix it ASAP. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:38, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou

Thank you for the Instructions. Im new here in wikipedia

Jayjay042298456 (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The snail article Euglandina singleyana

Hi Superhamster, Thanks so much for your work in fixing up this new snail article. I don't know if you are particularly interested in snails, but just in case you are, I am sending you this invitation:

I've noticed your edits on pages relating to Gastropods; perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Gastropods? If you would like more information, please visit the project page or the project talk page.

Very best wishes to you and a Happy New Year 2010, Invertzoo (talk) 14:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I never really looked at myself as having a particularly strong interest in snails (I stumbled across the article while doing new page patrol and saw that it needed some cleaning up), but now that I've got an invitation, why not, I'll join. Seems like an interesting topic enough that I could learn about. Thanks, and have a great New Years yourself =) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome! A very big WELCOME to WikiProject Gastropods for you SuperHamster, a new member! We are very happy that you decided to join the Project! Thank you. Please leave me a message if you have any snail-related questions or of course you can leave a message on the Project talk page here [3]. There are many useful things you can do on the project, even if you are not a snail expert. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 16:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Assessing and other stub work

Wow, you are so kind to volunteer to help out with the assessing! That would be great! Would you like to start on the letter M maybe? M for SuperHaMster? The Ms start here: [4].

1. And yes, you are correct that in our Project, generally speaking, species articles are of low importance and genus/genera are of mid importance, family and above of high importance.

2. As for the taxonomy in the taxobox, usually the part that needs updating, because it is out-of-date (or missing altogether), is the part between Class = Gastropoda and the Family = level. The easiest way to tackle that is to click on the name of the Family which should take you to the family article, and then you can cut and paste what is in that taxobox in those ranks, and slot it in. Oh and the fossil families sometimes don't have anything at all between class and superfamily but that is OK, leave them like that.

3. Also there are a bunch of small edits that I do (when needed) to fix up a stub article a bit. One thing is to put an extra line in, before the stub tag, at the bottom of the article to space it down a bit. I add a snail-stub tag if there is no stub tag at all on the article page.

4. Another thing I do is: if it is a Genus article or a Species article that uses the Latin name as the title, I make sure that the article title is in italics.

5. Actually there's a lot more other things too, but I don't want to weigh you down with too much stuff at first. You can see a more detailed list of how to check and fix up a stub here: [5]

What I may do is make a demo for you on one of my user pages of a really rough stub, and show how I leave it once I am finished. I will drop you a note as soon as I have that up so you can look at it.

Please go ahead and see how you do on a few. Don't hesitate to ask me any questions at all. Thanks again! Invertzoo (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, I set up a page where you can compare a really short non-fixed up stub with a fixed up version of it, here: [6]. You don't necessarily have to be as thorough as I was though. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help, I'll check out the demo and will get started on some stub clean-up as time permits (I've got other matters to attend to). I already do most of the formatting tasks whenever I'm cleaning up a stub article, so I shouldn't have a problem with that. I'll need to get familiar with the taxobox and such, though. I'll be sure to ask you if I'm unsure of anything. Thanks again, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Mandarina aureola

I worked a little on Mandarina aureola, everything all right? I noticed that the order was also included in the unranked section in the taxobox, so I just want ahead and removed it. There also seems to not be a species authority, as far as the source goes. Also, what should happen with the conservation status? The site says its endangered, but to what level? Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

I just took a look and what you did was really great, thanks so much. If you take a look at the article now you will see that I have added some links in the first sentence and did a couple more small tweaks. I also managed to find the authority and date for this species by doing a google search using the Latin name Mandarina aureola. Then after that I searched for the name Chiba in this resource [7]. As it turned out I had to look under Tiba, and then I got the full name so I could make the authority into a proper red link. Someon else can start that biography article, I'm not going to do that right now. Anyway now the article is as ready as it needs to be for the next year or two I think! Best, Invertzoo (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

P.S. You made me laugh with your other matters to attend to, me too, I always have to find time for pressing concerns. Invertzoo (talk) 22:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, it's a good game =) Anyway, thanks for all your help. I'll try to work on some more stubs over the next few days and see how it goes. Cheers, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Thankyou=

Happy new year...ok i will delete the street name —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayjay042298456 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Dear SuperHamster,

Our vision for Wikipedia is one of beauty, natural symmetry and light.

I wish you a Happy New Year, everything good for your family, your loved ones and yourself, peace and joy for all the people of the world. I also wish a joyful and peaceful expansion for Wikipedia, may it bring helpful, generous, and peaceful information to everyone in the world.
All the very best from Invertzoo (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

What a nice surprise! You are very kind! Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I see that was my first ever gastropod barnstar, so that means a lot to me! Invertzoo (talk) 23:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

That's good, glad you like you like (and no problem) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

My Farmville stuff....

I appreciate you talking to me before just arbitrarily deleting my stuff like a Wikinazi might do.

Here's the thing: If you go to FarmVilleSecrets.com, pay them $27, they send you a couple pdfs which contain what I am talking about. So.. how can I reference that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by WaxonWaxov (talk • contribs) 05:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hmm...what a ripoff. Anyway, I apologize, as it's late right now and I need to head to bed, so I cannot answer your question to its full extent. I'll get back to your ASAP (basically, after breakfast) with an answer that would have been better then a quick one that I could throw together right now. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm back. So if you want to cite a statement, you need to find a third-party site/book/other publication that covers the statement in a neutral point of view (for example, a CNN article covering Michael Jackson's death would be a third party and neutral source). You can always find something through a quick Google search. I searched for a long while, but couldn't find anything at all that covers or mentions that these sites are scams. Considering that it hasn't brought up any attention at all throughout the webs, it probably isn't notable enough to be worth mentioning in the article. Even so, the guides aren't exactly scams; as you mentioned in the article, they do have some tips and tricks as to how to play the game, even if they aren't so "secret." Since it hasn't been brought up as being a scam, I think it best to remove the particular controversial topic from the article, as it doesn't have any attention from the media. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Kissle

Be careful since it is alpha/beta software. Rich Farmbrough, 01:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC).

Archive Note: This comment was in reply to this message.

Archive Note: This comment was replied to here.

Query

8, or 6? Just double checking, Cirt (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Heh, I just realized that I gave you eight points for creating a good article instead of six. I converted the extra two points into bonus points for creating the first good article for the cup ;) You deserve it for the work you put into it. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, okay. No worries, Cirt (talk) 00:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Update: [8]. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 05:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Looks great, I'll add in the points. Sorry for not getting to it earlier, I had exams this week and free time wasn't of great quantity. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 11:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

VG Image Requests

Picture Perfect Hair Salon

Thanks for helping me with the page and can you please find a box shot for it thanks agian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canand1 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. I'll upload the box art for the game by tomorrow evening once I'm back from school (right now I've busy with a project). Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

OK thanks A Candela (talk) 16:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Foto Showdown

Can you please find a box shot for this game aswill thanks A Candela (talk) 16:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

System Flaw

Can you please find a box shot for this game aswill thanks A Candela (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll get to it as soon as soon as I can. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Ghostwire: Link to the Paranormal

Can you please help me with this page aswll thanks. A Candela (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll get to this one too tomorrow evening. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for all your Help you helped me a lot thanks A Candela (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem at all. If you need more images, feel free to list them here. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Tried searching, couldn't find any box art. Considering that the game is to be released in the last quarter of 2010, it'll probably be a while until box art is made for this game. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Sony Dash

sorrey about this but could you please make a page for the Sony Dash what was announced at CES 2010 thanks A Candela (talk) 02:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

No reason to be sorry :) I'll see about making an article on the subject. The topic may not meet guidelines for inclusion, particularilly because it has not been released yet. If I can dig up enough sources that would make the subject notable enough for inclusion, and wouldn't fall under being a "crystal ball," then I'll see about making an article when I've got time. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

it comes out in April in USA for $199 it's good I be geting one A Candela (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:NODRAMA/2

Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! --Jayron32 01:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Nanodragster

Can I help expand this? --TitanOne (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Sure, go right ahead, I wouldn't have any reason to stop you. It'd be great if you do. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, just wanted to pump up our No Drama initiative. --TitanOne (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK approved, gave you equal credits. Regards. --TitanOne (talk) 14:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! The article looks great, nice job expanding it. Cheers, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Infosexual

Hi. I don't believe this page qualified for G3, which is for introduction of deliberately false material: it seems like a well-meaning but misguided attempt to write an article about a deeply non-notable neologism. I've PRODded it instead. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for informing me. I tried looking up anything on the subject before tagging it, but couldn't find anything. Makes sense though, probably should have PRODed it. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

PS: It ended up being deleted anyways under G3. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for your comments on Wikipedia:Petition against Ignore All Rules abuse

RE: "I am a fan of IAR, but there is a point to where it can be used" I think you meant misused. Ikip 04:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for pointing that out, I appreciate it. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Snails and slugs

Hi SuperHamster, I notice from your sign that we will soon be seeing a lot less of you due to the pressures of schoolwork. Do you remember how far you got with the gastropod Ms? Should I leave the Ms for you to do when I finish the Ls in a few weeks' time? Or not? All good wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

I got just a few done (about 5 or so). If you want, you can go through the Ms's too, and I can get re-assigned a letter when I find myself with more time if that's all right. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, sounds like a plan! See you later, Invertzoo (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Nanodragster

On January 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nanodragster, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Cheers!

Evidently I was a little careless with my typing! HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 20:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

MuffledThud Talkback

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at MuffledThud's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Se7en

Hi SuperHamster, I hope you are doing well. :) There seems to be a minor discrepancy. Compare with [9]. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm good, thanks, hope you are to. Either I'm blind or you're wrong, but I don't see a problem; a new article scores 5 points, while expanding an article scores 2 points, for the beautiful grand total of 7. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, 7 was what was given previously, but you gave 6. (Also, I have not gotten the DYK for it yet, just only nominated it so far.) Cirt (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

In other words, it needs to be fixed minus 1 for a DYK that has not happened yet, and plus two because the new article (5) was also a "substantial" contribution. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see what you're getting at. I have a reply in my mind, but I don't have time to write it out, as I need to get to tennis lessons. I'll be back in about 2 hours or so and sort it out. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay, no worries. Whatever you decide, I will defer to your judgment. :) Cirt (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Okie dokies, I'm back. I know that the DYK didn't happen yet, but since I'm willing to bet a kick in the face by Chuck Norris that it'll happen, I just gave you the point. Anyway, truth be told, I don't like how the current scoring system is set up. The "getting points for expanding content" is too subjective. I'm thinking of adding more clear-cut definitions of what is considered a substantial contribution, such as adding x amount of prose earns you y amount of points. Here's what I've come up with. I've reduced the amount of points earned for creating an article to 3 (it's unfair if someone who writes one sentence gets a large amount), and then made additional points up for grabs for its length.

New Articles

• Creating a new bacon-related article scores 3 points
  • Points scored for expanding an article (see below) are also additionally added to the three points you get for creating an article.
• Creating a redirect, disambiguation page, or category scores 1 point
• Creating a bacon-related template scores 2 points

Article Expansion

• Adding 300 characters of verifiable prose to an article scores 1 point
  • Every three references added to an article scores 1 point
  • Majorly contributing to an article and bringing it up to...
    • Good article status scores 6 points
    • Featured article status scores 8 points
  • Adding an infobox, along with information in it, scores 1 point

Article Maintenance

• Copy-edits of at least six corrections/maintenance in an article earns 1 point. Only one point can be earned per article for copy-editing.

Example: Fixing three typos counts as three qualifying corrections regardless of whether or not those changes are made all in one edit or in three individual edits.

Images

• Uploading a bacon-related image scores 2 points
  • Achieving featured picture or quality image (on either the Commons or on Wikipedia) status scores and additional 6 points

Other

• Successful DYK nomination 1 point for both the nominator and key contributor(s).

What do you think? Is the scoring fair enough? Hopefully it won't be too complicated when reporting contributions. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Nod, you have some very good ideas. But perhaps for next year. I do not think changes should be made to the scoring system in this manner, with only a couple of weeks left in the event. Cirt (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

True, and it wouldn't be very fun to go through and apply the changes. Anyways, I've added your two points for the article, thanks for pointing it out. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! Cirt (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Beau-ti-ful

No prob. I just love that shot of Kong...didn't know I couldn't "borrow it". I wonder if you might find the time (someday, not now when your busy with school) to mentor me in real vandal control. It might take awhile 'cause I'm a bit slow on the pick-up with tools and all. I'm looking for somewhere in WikiPediaWorld to devote some time.--Buster7 (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Sure, it wouldn't be a problem. What I think I will do is set up a little "tutorial" (if you want to call it that) on one of my subpages. We can run through it, have examples/practice, clear up anything confusing, etc. I'll leave you a message when it's up and ready. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 14:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

1. Proposal to Close This RfC
2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

WikiThanks

Thanks a lot correcting and formatting the articles in Category:State Highways in Kerala --naveenpf (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

can you add reference as [10] for all the articles in Category:State Highways in Kerala --naveenpf (talk) 02:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem, glad to do it. And sure, I'll add the link to all the articles either today or tomorrow (depending on how much time I've got). Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot... I will try to add WP:INR template to talk page--naveenpf (talk) 02:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good. If you want, I can place the template using Auto Wiki Browser (it's the same tool I have been using to add the reference you pointed out to me to all the articles). It would be a much faster way to do it. Let me know if you want me to do it (it wouldn't be a problem), or you can go ahead and do it if you wanted to. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Points scoring

I was reviewing the Bacon WikiCup standings and given the far greater importance of this work to say WikiCup efforts, for example, I think the scoring system may be too low. I'd like to it upped by 3 decimal places so that a new article is 5,000 points instead of 5. This would make the current standings something like Spinningspark first with 109,000 points, Cirt second with 94,000 points and Glane23 third with 73,000 points. But maybe it's okay the way it is... :)

Thanks very much for handling the scorer's table. I think you've done a very fine job, and I'm very happy to see I have several more days to update my tally. I'd like to be in the top 5 :) I can't wait to see what the trophy looks like. It must be AWESOME! ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Hmm...not a bad idea. 109,000 certainly sounds much better than 109. I guess it's all about perception. Why not? Let's do it.

And no problem, I was glad to do it. It was quite fun (well, as fun as keeping score can get). Wouldn't have been able to do it if you hadn't created such a great event. Good luck getting up into the top five.

As for the trophy/barnstar, I can't wait to see it either, considering I haven't even started it yet...time to pop out Paint and see what I can do.

By the way, we're going to do this next year too, right? =) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Whoops, just noticed this. That's some early planning. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Why wait? :) I attempted to "update" the scoring, but the changes met with resistance so it's probably best to leave them as is. We all know that a Bacon Challenge point is the equivalent of at least a hundred or maybe a thousand WikiCup points. So I think it's all good. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, that's a shame. We could always make the change for next year. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

It was over before I knew it happened. You rock!!! David in DC (talk) 03:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem =) Quite a random vandalism edit, if I do say so myself... ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Bacon Wikicup awards

Did someone steal the silverware before you could hand it out? SpinningSpark 18:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I caught some bacon-loving hooligans trying to break in and steal all the awards and bacon, but I managed to ward them off, so it's all good. I was/am planning to hand them out either today or tomorrow when I have time (busy week with school, as always), sorry for the delay. Congrats on achieving the most points, you did great. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

ManHamster, if only I got the bacon boys (Leonard Woolsey Bacon, Edward Woolsey Bacon, Thomas Rutherford Bacon, George B. Bacon) in on time at DYK--oh, I'd still be third. Thanks Hamster! Drmies (talk) 05:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

And yes, congratulations, Spinningspark! Drmies (talk) 05:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Very fine job indeed and my thanks for all your hard work, as well. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 05:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

173.48.126.181

watching his edits. Dlohcierekim 21:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Could be a her, for all we know ;) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Reply about Bacon WikiCup page.

Thanks. This is IP80.564.583.0 now "Once-An-IP". I registered an account to create the page, but forgot my password. But I'll remember this password now, so, no more anonymous editing for me anymore. I wish I was part of the first one, but I wasn't. But that's okay, and I'd like to be part of this season.--Once-An-IP (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I've also reported my first article to User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011/Submissions. It is only at stub staus though...--Once-An-IP (talk) 05:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Okay, great! I'll get scoring soon. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 12:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Adventure Quest and "I Know You"

Hahaha, okay, here's how I know you. Way back at the end of 2009 (October I think) I created a page for my userspace, but made it in the Article space, because I was new and didn't know how to make subpages. You were the guy that moved the page into my userspace. By the way, if you used to play Adventure Quest, have you tried the new AE game, Epic Duel? I find it way better-I might have got the external link wrong but you might want to check it out. Me and Varauk are trying to make an article for it.-Jakkinx|Talk|Sign! 03:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I remember that. Glad to see you back. But no, I haven't tried the game; though I think I've heard of it. I stopped playing a long while back. Seems like a good subject for an article. And you got your external link just fine :) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 12:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, good. I am indeed thinking of remaking the Epic Duel article, as it was deleted. I will be doing it with a few friends this time though...-Jakkinx|Talk|Sign! 21:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Emporea

What's the assertion of significance or importance that you see in the article? I don't think that being an MMO makes a subject necessarily notable, and there are no independent sources cited. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

While there isn't an exact reason or line I can point to as to why the subject is significant, I feel that at least some importance is established by what is already in the article. I know that it does not have any sources in the article as of the moment I have added a reference, but there are some out there, however limited, establishing a hint of notability. I feel that a speedy deletion tag isn't right for this particular article, and a PROD would be better. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Spieletipps article was what did it for me. That showed there'd been coverage of it in a reliable source, so it's not just a dime-a-dozen game that two people created after school. The Wikilinks to the company helped too. Thank you for adding both. —C.Fred (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Yep, no problem, Spieletipps seems to be a common resource for German-speakers in one way or another. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Gorsko Ablanovo

Now I've finished typing, you can edit away to your hearts content. But I can tell you it's not very nice having an article hijacked and altered while your still typing the second sentence. Billybangleballs (talk) 00:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, sorry about that, I did seem to jump on it a bit too quickly. I'll try to give a bit more time after I first see it on the new pages list for the creator to make adjustments. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

You got it.

It seemed little more than a couple of declaratory sentences, but I agree that the subject is notable. It'll be up in a moment. Have fun! PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

• No problem; by the looks of things, it seems that it'll grow very quickly based on the message below.  :) Gotta sign off...see you soon! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Rest of discussion located here ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing the SimCity Deluxe headline and adding the redirection!

It's a bit of a small article right now, if you know how to fix it up a bit (I don't), that would be appreciated - there are images available via the link in the article, maybe you can add an info box? Or a "this article is a stub" message? LOL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EssentialParadox (talk • contribs) 03:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem :) I'll see if I can add some more info and an image or two soon, but it will probably have to be tomorrow (right now I've got to finish a Spanish project I've been postponing...). Also, remember to sign any messages you post using ~~~~. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SimCity Deluxe

Hi. I've proposed SimCity Deluxe for deletion and provided an extensive rationale in the PROD. This SHOULD be an uncontroversial delete based on policy, but I'm equally happy for you to take the PROD down providing yourself or someone else takes note of the issues therein and does something about them. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. It seems that the article's been redirected since, and that seems plausible to me, as the game is a long way off from being released, as said in your PROD reasoning. I may add the game to SimCity (series), as also suggested by you, if I can find more coverage. If not, we'll wait a while. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at DwayneFlanders's talk page.
Message added 03:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dwayne Flanders was here! ^talk 03:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! Regards, PDCook (talk) 01:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Message replied to here ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

New Message

You posted message on my User talk:99.88.78.94. You said I vandalized Blind Side (film) because I typed who the fuck keeps on deleting my corrections. I'm really sorry. I was trying to leave message. Right before I vandalized it, I added extra details to Blind Side (film) but somebody kept on deleting those extra details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.78.94 (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I see, you're referring to this edit and this edit that you made, correct? Looking at the edits, it seems that you removed some details of the plot, leaving a poor understanding to anyone who is reading it. Next time there's a disagreement with another editor, you should bring it up on the talk page of the user who reverted your edits, not on the article. It should also be done politely. No one's going to leave happy and no constructive outcome will ever come out of a discussion that isn't civil. I know it can be maddening when another editor reverts your edits, but just keep that in mind. Thanks, and good luck, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Animal (restaurant)

...the page I created has a notability tag on it. Does the sourced James Beard Foundation information establish notability (ie. can the tag be removed)?

thanks.--Once-An-IP (talk) 04:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm not one who knows a lot about restaurants, but I'll look into it. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Bacon Challenge

Hey Super Hampster, thanks for the note about the Bacon Challenge and Bacon WikiCup, I am glad to see that my vision has come this far, and is in such good hands. I don't know how much time I will have to add to it, but hopefully I can increase my contributions as time goes on. Either way, every little bit helps. On a side note, can you change my flag from Canada to Mongolia. Cheers, --kelapstick (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Yep, it's turned into quite an event, especially with CoM's and SkyAttacker's contributions towards it. It's unfortunate that neither of them will be able to participate in this year's challenge. I've made the change for you, thanks for letting me know. I assumed you wanted Canada since you were it last year. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, I had actually requested Nova Scotia I think, it just never got changed. At the time I was a Canadian Living in the US, now I am a Canadian living (2/3 of the time) in Mongolia, I figurd that there would be quite a few Canada flags, so I was going for diversity. Cheers. --kelapstick (talk) 22:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see. You were the only one participating under the Canadian flag last year, so I'm guessing there won't be any this year (unless a bunch of new people sign up *crosses fingers*). Following your idea to create diversity, I've also changed my flag. Best, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at Dwayne's talk page.
Message added 23:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dwayne was here! ^talk 23:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at Dwayne's talk page.
Message added 23:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dwayne was here! ^talk 23:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at Dwayne's talk page.
Message added 23:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dwayne was here! ^talk 23:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Why did you revert his edit on his own talk page? –Turian (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

That was an accident, I'm on my iPod right now and made a misclick on my watchlist. I promptly attempted to self-revert, but you speedily beat me to it. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

To be clear...

What I said was I reported to the Wikipedia Sysop involved, and expected them to do their job about the trolling/outing. Hiding such edits away doesn't help them know what is going on. Thanks for respecting my wishes, Super. --TK-CP (talk) 02:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Yep, I figured that you took such action. Just weighing in, but if I was in your situation, I'd just remove the message and move on, rather than report it. Attacks are sometimes better dealt with by being ignored rather than being engaged, as that just "feeds the troll" as the quote goes. Blocking won't ever stop someone who is ambitious enough at pestering, but if they get no reaction, that's when they'll stop. Less of a workload for you anyway if you go that route. Also, it's usually better to refer to administrators as just administrators; "authority" is a bit powerful if you get what I mean. Adminship is simply receiving a set of tools to be able to help maintain the project further, not a level of users who are more authoritative than the rest. Anyway, no problem :) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh, don't misunderstand me, Super. I agree. But at some point assuming good faith means one has to endure the unpleasant. If the Administrators don't act according to their own site rules, then I am justified in doing so and throwing their lack of response in their faces. The cat was already out of the bag here, so to speak, before that infant trolled my page. I know the Admins are watching all involved and the collective pages. Thanks. --TK-CP (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I looked at the situation a bit closer (I was in a rush before so didn't check) and noticed the other attacks that the user left you. I had previously thought that they had just left the message that I undid, which explains why I would have just ignored them, as you understand. But seeing the multiple messages, I would have reported it myself too. So I completely agree with you on your stand :) Cheers, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 10:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Bless you. Different places demand different reactions. On CP I got so tired of mindless, repetitive "debate", which really wasn't because it never concluded, I reasoned that if a wiki is a special-purpose project; of, by and for conservative Christians (it could also be the case in a wiki project run by atheists), and their take on things, it served no purpose to encourage endless debate, where neither side was inclined to compromise. This is usually the case where religion or philosophical beliefs are at stake. Here on Wikipedia the stated goal is NPOV, where theoretically articles should incorporate both sides of a given issue...which is admittedly a very fine line to walk. I don't think anyone of integrity should have a problem adjusting their thinking to edit at either place, but maybe that's just me! --TK-CP (talk) 21:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

RFA Nominating

Do you feel comfortable with me nominating you to be an administrator, i really think you deserve it and you are experienced enough for this, i think you have the experience to obtain the mop. I wouldn't oppose at all. Dwayne was here! ^talk 21:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

At the moment, I would like a bit more experience before becoming an admin, mostly in the areas of content expansion among everything else in general. Perhaps at a later date. Thank you for the kind offer and consideration, I'll keep you in mind for nominating me come the time :) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, your choice. Please let me know when you feel you are ready.  :) Dwayne was here! ^talk 23:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Great, thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at Dwayne's talk page.
Message added 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dwayne was here! ^talk 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Bacon Challenge 2011

Since ChildofMidnight has been banned, using one of their subpages for the project seems inappropriate. Do you mind if I move it to your userspace? caknuck _° needs to be running more often 05:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

I was assuming that CoM wouldn't mind, and I doubt he does, but at the same time I was a bit resistant myself upon creating more subpages for the project in his userspace, per your reason. I'll go ahead and move the pages. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I took the liberty of updating a few of the links going to and from the header template. (BTW, I've thrown my meathelmet into the ring for the challenge.) caknuck _° needs to be running more often 06:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Great, thanks. What country would you like to represent in the WikiCup? ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Texas caknuck _° needs to be running more often 06:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, great, I'll add you to the WikiCup and add up the scores for your contribs, either now or tomorrow sometime later today (I'm watching a movie w/ a friend right now and probably heading to bed sometime soon). Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiLubber

I seem to be having a problem with WikiLubber. On the article High Rollers, he reverted a revert I did of his and his edit reason was such was "FANcruft," as if it was an insult. I promptly removed the warning he put on my talk page. Seeming as how you've had past dealings with him, what do you recommend I do rather than engaging in an edit war with him? Nicholasm79 (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

The best thing to do when these situations arise is to discuss it with the other user. Try asking him to explain in more detail why he reverted your edit, along with stating why you believe that the edit should remain in the article. Don't try to take his remark personally; while you may consider it rude, which labeling an edit as fancruft may often be, try to assume good faith.

I myself aren't very knowledgeable when it comes to shows and entertainment, especially older ones, but looking at the content that WikiLubber labelled as fancruft, I agree with him on removing that small bit of content, simply due to the fact that Ruta Lee getting hit in the head with a chandelier is not exactly relevant to that section and that it really doesn't add any better knowledge or understanding of the topic for the reader. That's my view, anyway. Thanks and good luck, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

All I'm saying is that the part that I removed was not notable and not even sourced. WikiLubber (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

BTW, I did not know you were adding a message while I was making that message. Please forgive me. WikiLubber (talk) 23:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Ah, you probably experienced an edit conflict. Don't worry about it :) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback.

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at Donald Duck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Donald Duck (talk) 02:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

O'Hare International

It's no problem. It seemed like an accident.

--Dklep7 (talk) 00:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Archival Note: Message was in reply to this message ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

QwerpQwertus has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks For The Help! QwerpQwertus (talk) 22:48, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, thanks! I don't believe that I've ever gotten a cookie before. You're welcome. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Your Barnstar

This user just got a generic mini-barnstar from CompuHacker. Press DEL or click here to sell it for §1.

I'm gonna shove this somewhere. CompuHacker (talk) 01:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Why thank you ;) Nice to know that my first barnstar happens to be for something that really wasn't "constructive" at all. Ah well. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For your help in reverting vandalism on my vandalism page! (no pun intended ;)  – Tommy2010 02:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Quite ironic. No problem :) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:48, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Congrats! You're first to receive this reward!

User:QwerpQwertus/The Puzzle Piece Award

You've been rewarded the Wiki Puzzle Piece Award - Puzzle Piece Two! ~ QwerpQwertus ------------------- Award One

WikiProject Apple Inc.'s Backlog Elimination Drive

Graph of recent progress. As the coordinator of the WikiProject Apple Inc.Backlog Elimination Drive for May 2010, I would like to thank you for your active participation in the drive. I am writing to inform you that we have made great progress in eliminating unassessed articles. Remember the drive ends June 10, so keep working! Once again, thank you for participating, and we look forward to a meaningful drop in the numbers due to your hard work and efforts. Cheers, mono 18:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks For Reviewing Me!

Thanks for reviewing me! —Preceding signed comment added by ~QwerpQwertus·_Talk_·_Contribs_· The Wiki Puzzle Piece Award 04:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:APPLE's Backlog Elimination Drive is over!

Graph of recent progress. As the coordinator of the WikiProject Apple Inc. Backlog Elimination Drive for May 2010, I would like to thank you for your active participation in the drive. I am writing to inform you that we have assessed all project articles. We thank all of our participants, as we couldn't have done it without you! Once again, thank you for participating, and we appreciate the meaningful drop in the numbers due to your hard work and efforts. Awards will be delivered soon to our participants! Cheers, mono 03:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Ooh, that dropped down really fast o.O I was planning to more this week, but oh well. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 10:19, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Santaluces Community High School (BLP)

that was not poorly refrenced, i go to the school —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polishpatriot54 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Everything on Wikipedia must be verifiable. To reference something is to provide a citation to a reliable, third party source of which you got the information from. This means linking the information to a book, website, or other published source of information. When it comes to writing about living people, especially when it involves controversial material, having a reliable source is a must. Personal experience and knowledge, however, does not qualify as a source, as there is no way to actually verify the information in the article. What you consider a source is considered original research and is not allowed on Wikipedia. However, if you can find a source (such as a news article in this case), you may then re-add the information, along with linking to the source of information (learn how to cite sources at Wikipedia:Citing sources) Thanks. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Combat Arms

Hi,

I do not need to provide references when I'm quoting facts as opposed to opinions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.84.241.121 (talk) 01:53, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Alas, that's incorrect. Everything in Wikipedia needs to be verifiable with the inclusion of reliable sources - that's one of the most important things that editors need to follow on Wikipedia. Whether it be facts, opinions, or quotes, everything should be able to be verified by the reader by linking to the source of which the information came from. If there isn't a source, there's no telling what's correct or incorrect - if facts didn't need to be verified and sourced, Wikipedia will lose all credibility, as there would be absolutely no way to tell what's right or wrong, other than to trust the last guy who edited a page. That, unfortunately, is something that cannot always be done. If you need further assistance or have questions, feel free to ask. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:09, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Very well, I refuse to let the world not know about this business model of Combat Arms. I will continue to edit this article until you do not. You have a life, I don't. As per your request I will create a hosted site with the relevant information as open and objective journalism and provide a reference on the wiki article. You win. Your beloved (and deceiving) Doobic Studios and Combat Arms loses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.84.241.121 (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I commend you for your efforts, but your journalistic website would still not be considered a reliable source. It'd be a source, just not reliable. You'd have to try harder than that. Also note that, I'm not the only one who would reverts your edits; once you get rid of me, you'll have to go after the rest of 'em. There's a lot of 'em. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Copy editing drive

Hi! User:QwerpQwertus suggested you might be interested in participating in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. We still have a backlog of over 7500 articles extending back to the beginning of 2008! We really need help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. Diannaa ^TALK 05:50, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good, I'd love to join. I'll add my name to the list of participants as soon as I get my hands on a computer. I tried to do it from my iPod, and was oh-so-very excited that I'd finally be able to put to good use the copy-paste function I paid 5 bucks for in an upgrade, but truth be told, the edit box isn't scrollable on an it. Ah well...that's why Windows is better. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:50, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for signing up for the July Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two and a half years, all the way back to the beginning of 2008! We're really going to need all the help we can muster to get it down to a manageable number. We've ambitiously set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog this month. In order to do that, we're going to need more participants. Is there anyone that you can invite or ask to participate with you? If so, we're offering an award to the person who brings in the most referrals. Just notify ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! or Diannaa ^TALK of who your referrals are. Once again, thanks for your support! --Diannaa ^TALK 15:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I've left a message on the talk page of several users that I believe would be interested in participating in the drive: LadyofShalott, Spinningspark, December21st2012Freak, and OlEnglish. I also notified Cirt, but they expressed that they would not like to participate this time around. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Dramaout

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians

and also a mention on WP:ANI. I would love to have you participate! Remember July 5th, the starting date! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I see you have signed up! Consider notifying 3 good editors of this to encourage more participation. Perhaps saying

I am participating in this. Please consider doing the same! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

All right, I'll see if I can notify anyone that may be interested in particpating. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SuperHamster. You have new messages at Mono's talk page.
Message added 22:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Star

For assessing over one article in the WikiProject Apple Inc. Assessment Department's Backlog Elimination Drive!

Enjoy! monosock 15:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

WP Apple in the Signpost

WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Apple Inc. for a Signpost article to be published in July. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not actually an "official" member of WikiProject Apple. I just participated in the Backlog Elimination Drive in May :) But since you left this message, and considering that I have been recently active with it, I might was well join. I'll be happy to answer some of those questions. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

Sorry if I ever appeared aggressive... I tend to get carried away :P —fetch·comms 00:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem, same thing from me; I hope I didn't appear harsh whenever I made any points. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:34, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

If you have time...

Hi! If you get some free time, could you drop by WP:RFF and review a few (or even one)? We've been getting a lot of requests lately and we're getting behind. Plus I'm going on vacation, so that'll really leave only one or two active reviewers. Thanks! ~ QwerpQwertus · Contact Me  · 22:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Sure - I haven't actually done anything in the past in that department, but it shouldn't be hard at all. I'll see if I can start reviewing later today when I've got the time. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Jimbo's talkpage

Are you not supposed to have comments in chronological order from top to bottom, regardless of which section they go in? Or am I wrong about that? ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 01:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

A talkback would be good, by the way. My watchlist is too full. :) ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 01:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

As far as I know, there's nothing that says that comments in a section need to strictly follow chronological order. It's pretty open; no need for strict rules. If you're making a comment, yes, it should normally go below the rest of them; however, when there's a bunch of partially un-related comments inbetween that aren't "with the flow", it can be messy and confusing when you're trying to reply to one specific comment, especially since discussions can often branch of into different "sub" disussions. The reason why I did what I did on Jimbo's talkpage was because Ron Ritzman's comment was directly in reply to mine; if it had gone at the bottom, it would turn out messy, as neither Moreno Oso's comment nor Camelbinky's comment was in reply to mine. It would go from "Talking about a new page" to "Poof! You're a founder!" to "I have a question!" all the way back to "Talking about a new page". Of course, it all depends on good judgement. :) Basically what I'm trying to say is, the best route to take is the one that makes the most sense. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

I suppose there are shades of grey in all of this... And I'm a member of the talk page cleanup crew, so I should have figured that out already. :) ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 01:46, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

I've asked our glorious leader (of the WPTP) to give his opinion. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 01:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Although he hasn't edited in ten days... ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 01:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)