User talk:Tamás Kádár
This is Tamás Kádár's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Aláíráskód: Kádár Tamás Kép:Nyíl.gif Megint vitatkozol?? 2007. március 31., 13:36 (CEST)
http://larrypagesergeybrin.blogspot.com/index.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/51361934@N00/
SEA.JPG
editWhy did you delete my photo? Sea.jpg--Tamás Kádár 19:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- I assume you're referring to Image:Sea9.jpg? As I stated in the deletion log, I deleted it because it did not specify where the image came from. --Carnildo 21:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I thought that I can creat my user page not you. --Tamás Kádár 22:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Question regarding images
editTamás, what are Image:Vitorlas.jpg, Image:Nyar2.jpg and Image:Osz.jpg pictures of? --Iamunknown 01:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- These are my paintings. But I deleted from my user:page, because somebody didn't like User:Tamás Kádár page..--Tamás Kádár 15:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- They are beautiful. :-) If they are unused, would you mind if they are deleted? --Iamunknown 02:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Your user page
editI've just returned from wikibreak. I honestly can't remember what might have been wrong with your userpage. It looks fine. Best regards. YechielMan 21:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Poopodesert.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Poopodesert.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikilinking
editPlease do not add duplicate wikilinks to articles, as it is a bit excessive. Please see the page the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Why?HEY!
editThe image had been tagged for at least 7 days, which meant it was eligible for deletion under our criteria for speedy deletion. ^demon[omg plz] 21:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Loon Lake (Gogebic County, Michigan)
editTamas, to answer your question w.r.t. the location of this body of water, the coordinates are 46°12′N 89°18′W / 46.200°N 89.300°W Hgjudd 22:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Re:Wikiprojects
editSee Wikipedia:WikiProject. -- John Reaves (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Archiving talk pages
editThis page has the instructions on how to set up archiving. It says it's inactive, but it still works. A different bot (Shadowbot3) picked up the slack and now does the work instead of Werdnabot. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Here is another bot that does the same sort of work. They make it sound hard to set up but it isn't. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Kingdom of Mysore
editThanks for your support.Dineshkannambadi 15:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikiproject: Climate Change
editI became a member a few weeks ago but i have only recently realized that this project has become almost stagnant in the last year. Very little activity going on. I was just wondering whether you think this project can be salvaged and new life put into it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seddon69 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Merging WikiProjects
editHi, there is a proposal to merge inactive WikiProject (Wikipedia:WikiProject Climate change and Wikipedia:WikiProject Energy development) into WikiProject Environment. Please voice your opinions. OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I Strongly disagree. These are very simular projects, but there are many differences. THis 3 projects are good at this versions.--Tamás Kádár (talk) 10:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- We have already merged a month ago. The decision was unamnious. OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Al Gore + climate solutions
edit"I was just wondering whether you think this project can be salvaged and new life put into it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seddon69 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)"
- I think we have to write some article about the solutions with a lot of details. We should edit the Al Gore article, to develope , to finish to Feature article. (Bali conference)--Tamás Kádár (talk) 10:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Extinct settlements
editPlease have a look at this proposal for a new project (ExtinctSettlments) and add your votes and/or views. I am canvassing as many interested people as I can and your name was on a relevant project list. Folks at 137 (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
re: Folks at 137 (talk) Thanks the information!!!!--Tamás Kádár (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
== Re: Walter Connelly ==--Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry i don't understand your request. Can you explain it to me? --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 18:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh i understand what you mean. I don't know anything about the article i was just fixing a link. --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 18:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Re :(( --Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Sarcocystis
editThanks for the note. I'm working on classifying all the hosts. Please feel free to contribute :-) DrMicro (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Tell me about it :-) The classification is (to me anyway) tough. I'm a microbiologist not a zoologist :-(
The plan is to try to get this page up to Featured List status. Might take a while.
I'm very pleased to see anyone pays any attention to my work on parasites. Its a very lonely area. DrMicro (talk) 18:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know this feeling. You just write, and the others not pay any attention, but probably that is a good article. Just we have to work on it.! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- I have (just about) finished the classification of hosts on Sarcocystis. Aside from references :-( is there anything else that needs doing?DrMicro (talk) 14:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I will try to search for something and to expand the article. Keep your fingers crossed! Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 07:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I found a few things. Take a look now. See also the deletion discussion. --Ouro (blah blah) 08:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I see.--Tamás Kádár (talk) 14:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Do you think we could remove the notability tag now? I'd say we could. --Ouro (blah blah) 16:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I see.--Tamás Kádár (talk) 14:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Money
editDid you copied the Money ; 16:44 . . (+22,846 new editions?????????--Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC))
Don't use copy+paste!!! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I reverted vandalism there. I reverted or undid the previous editor who blanked the page. skip sievert (talk) 16:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I see, this is your luck!! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 17:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Do not make personal attacks or continue to harass or post on my user page. Do not post further comments on my user page. skip sievert (talk) 17:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
You have mail
editYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Guido's RFC
editIf you'd like - if you have faced particular areas where you think Guido has clearly pushed a POV against a very clear consensus, that would help as it generally requires an expertise and knowledge that I don't have and don't have the time to acquire. Otherwise, suggestions are welcome, or you can directly add diffs, which are generally better, or links to sections/archive sections (which require much more reading and interpretation in most cases). WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 17:32, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to wikipedia
editWelcome!
Hello, Tamás Kádár, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Heres some pointers on how to expand and edit articles. Great to have you on board!! The Bald One White cat 18:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello The Bald One! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 11:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I have expanded Kumarwarti. I've now started all 4000 VDCs in Nepal. Now they all need to be expanded beyond stubs. If you are interested in expanding any ther eis further demographic data on education/economy/religion etc on the reference given. Select the district and click the VDC and then click at the bottom which ever info you want. I started them in the belief that they can all be expanded into full articles. Hopefully more information will also become available on each history etc. I have done a fair bit of work on Hungary myself. Many villages and templates and artists have been started by me! Such as Economy of Bács-Kiskun and its villages. Your help would also be much appreciated with translating articles from Hungarian wiki! The Bald One White cat 12:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
THANKS!!! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Diplomacy
editUser talk:Plumoyr --Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Embassy in Wien
editHello, I see that you've just written the Hungarian–North Korea relations article. You wrote in it that "North Korea has an embassy in Wien", but Wien is in Austria. So, what does the embassy in Wien have similar with Hungarian-North Korea relations? Could you fix it? Kubek15T CS 11:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I know. In Wien there is a Accredited embassy . See also: http://www.kulugyminiszterium.hu/kum2005/Templates/wordsablon.aspx?NRMODE=Published&NRORIGINALURL=/kum/hu/bal/Kepviseletek/Kulfoldi_kepviseletek_Magyarorszagon/Nagykovetsegek_es_Fokonzulatusok/azsia.htm&NRNODEGUID=%7B6950B9CB-9163-4C8F-A2A8-08F60CE4135D%7D&NRCACHEHINT=NoModifyGuest#korea
Hungary-Turkey Relations
editI do not, sorry...I'm not even sure what sort of relations my own country has with Turkey. Hope you don't mind the little fixes I've been making to some of your articles. Keep up the good work! --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 16:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sure and it's my pleasure. :-) --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 16:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Berkeley, New South Wales photo
editG'day. Thanks for your message. Unfortunately, I do not have a photograph of Berkeley, New South Wales. I live some 1,100 kilometres north of Berkeley, so it's improbable that I will take a photo of Berkeley any time in the near future. --TripleThree (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- About Australia-Hungary relations. You might want to include something about Charles Zentai if you can find reliable sources related to the diplomatic relations between our two countries. The case of Charles Zentai attracted considerable media attention in Australia. --TripleThree (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- I just added a ref to the Australian Embassy in Budapest on the Australia–Hungary relations page. I can't find refs to Hungary's embassy in Canberra or its consulates, I don't understand a word of Hungarian so I can't navigate the Hungarian government websites. The Hungarian news bulletin "Hirora" appears on the SBS network here on Sunday mornings, but I don't understand a word. What does "Hirora" mean in English, anyway? --TripleThree (talk) 17:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hungary–Sweden relations
editA proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hungary–Sweden relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No content about countries relations with each other.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. QueenCake (talk) 21:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- The Hungary–Sweden relations aricle has been improved.
There is content about countries relations with each other.
- Can you upload a picture about the Hungary–Sweden relations? Thanks! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes this article is much better now, no longer a candidate for proding. Although it could do with some copy-editing, hopefully it's the start of a better article. As for an image try using a blank world map and highlighting Hungary and Sweden - unfortunately I am no good at that sort of thing! QueenCake (talk) 14:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Woodward effect AFD
editJust FYI, I updated myself from Delete to Keep. I'm not asking you to change your mind, but to just review the new sources. It could still go either way, and I have no preference in any event. It's a fairly big shift in material for an article of the size, so I just want to make sure you see it. I don't know if it's a shift in value, and am up in the air on that (like you can see from my comment). rootology (C)(T) 22:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Brazil–Hungary relations"
editA page you created, Brazil–Hungary relations, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. BigHairRef | Talk 15:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Hungary–Sri Lanka relations"
editA page you created, Hungary–Sri Lanka relations, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. BigHairRef | Talk 15:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hungary–Indonesia relations
editA proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hungary–Indonesia relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- absolutely no assertion of notability in article - probably because there isn't any notability to assert. What's next? Bhutan and Liechtenstein?
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Merbabu (talk) 12:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Amar Amarni
editI have nominated Amar Amarni, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Amarni. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Oo7565 (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
editThe article you created: Bahrain–Hungary relations may be deleted from Wikipedia.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.
Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:
- Find sources for Bahrain–Hungary relations: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.
Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
- 1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
- 2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)
- 3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
- 4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.
If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Hungary–Philippines relations
editI have nominated Hungary–Philippines relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary–Philippines relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 01:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Hungary-Qatar relations
edit- Hungary–Qatar relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
fails WP:N and is also not needed A bloke called AndrewConvosMy Messies 19:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies
editHi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 19:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Hungary–Morocco relations has been nominated for deletion
editI'm alerting you, the creator of this page, of this per WP:CIVIL.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Dance10.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Dance9.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)