Tslocum

p2pChan

Just wondering on wheres the source code for p2pchan. Also whats the status of that project and how workable it is. I think there is a possibility of reviving it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akimbomidget (talk • contribs) 11:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Sayyed Aamir Ali

I have just started work on this article, I have also furnished a reference as well. Could you possibly remove deletion tag from this article?--Asikhi (talk) 08:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

doood!!

Your back! Sticking around for a while? THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 08:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't use Huggle much now for reverting, but the dropdown menu for reverting with the other warnings doesn't list shortcuts anymore so perhaps they're gone. Your not the only one wondering: Wikipedia_talk:Huggle#Keyboard_shortcuts_for_non-vandalism_revert_reasons. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I3detroit

Regarding the warning you left for Bradmcma when he blanked the article he created at I3detroit (since deleted), you shouldn't revert and warn him about that as his blanking of the article can be taken as a request for deletion per WP:CSD#G7. You should just re-tag the article with {{db-g7}}. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tslocum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)