Wingdude88

This is my first user talk page post.

Testing testing, one two three.......

Any questions or comments on my working and surfing here, please feel free to comment on this talk page. However, all vulgarities on my page with be removed by me personally.

Thank you.

-Wingdude88

Wicked

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi Wingdude, I noticed your edits to the Wicked musical article, and whilst very good, it is not necessary to go into details about the minor characters when a brief description of them can be put into the plot summary. WP:MT guidelines state there shouldn't really be a character table, and that the information in it should be in the plot synopsis. The aim is to make a concise plot synopsis where people can find the main points of information they need. I know you are new to the project, please feel free to ask me if you have any sort of questions/problems and i'll be more than happy to try and help.Mark E (talk) 10:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey dude, what I meant by the table not needing to be there referred to the information in it aswell!. If the character list with the descriptions is to be there then it should really be in the table, but the information as it stands would be better suited to a specialist Wikipedia on Wicked/OZ if you get me. A good one to read is THIS PAGE which outlines the article structure guidelines. For example it states ""Long, detailed descriptions of characters are not needed (unless necessary to convey the story-line). Rather at the first mention of an important character in the Synopsis, some effort should be made to convey the personality or characteristics of the character. If a story is complex, the characters confusing, then a list of principal characters may be given.""Mark E (talk) 17:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have been doing that, and you don't seem to recognize my sig as such.--The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire 23:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I don't have a link to my talk page in my sig. I'll try to fix that soon.

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:54, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WP:BDC

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Welcome, Wingdude88, to the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! You have met all of the membership requirements. Any concerns should be directed to Steveo2. See the Birthday Committee Project Page to see our userbox and the Birthday Message Templates. Go to the bulletin board to see any new announcements concerning the committee. Remember, Be Bold!

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notice: I am making an article soon.

This is more of a note-to-self.

Make an article for Pride of Westmoreland Marching Band soon.

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: My edits in Batman in film

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

At least you realize that they aren't appropriate at this time; you'd be amazed how many people use the "it's frakkin' obvious" argument. While you are likely correct (and please God don't let Catwoman be like the Schumacher-worthy 2004 film of the same name), we need to adopt - and retain - a wait-and-see demeanor. Our mission isn't to guess right or to race to the finish line ahead of everyone else. Our only mission is to remain encyclopedic. There is no hurry.
Anyway, thanks for the note. :) -Jack Sebastian (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wedding Singer

Hi, thanks for asking my opinion. Go ahead and put the synopsis into the article, it's not a copyright violation to write in your own words, nice job. Two suggestions: could you put in where Act 2 begins, and could you add where the songs fit into the plot. (It would look something like this: "Robbie blah blah ("Song title")."

Also, you might want to break up the text into paragraphs, I think it's a little easier for people to read that way. I'll take a closer look at the synopsis after you put it into the article, but I have just a few days before I go on a Wikibreak for the Spring.

Again, many thanks for discussing, this is a great way to work at Wikipedia. JeanColumbia (talk)

Wizards of Waverly Place

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Here's te explanation: There was no Razzie Award with that title! They are FILM awards, also given link is useless/irrelevant

Uh yeah? While that might be so,there was no need to be rude about it',since I was merely "restoring what someone else had posted prior to repeated deletions!" Silvershrek (talk) 02:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)SilvershrekReply

Dude, I'm sorry if I came across as rude. I didn't know exclamation points automatically meant rudeness. My apologies for upsetting you; I was just excited that I figured out why there was such an edit war-esque situation. I meant no harm, honestly. -The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 02:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Literature

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Literature. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply