Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Phidippus audax male

Phidippus audax male

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2012 at 20:58:36 (UTC)

Original – Portrait of an adult male P. audax

Reason

High quality photo.

Articles in which this image appears

Phidippus audax, arthropod eye

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arachnids

Creator

Opoterser

• Support as nominator --Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
• Support I love phidippus, and this image is high quality. Rhonalex (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
• Support -- An incredible shot! How did the spider get a green backdrop? One can see the reflection in what appear to be the spider's four eyes. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
• Support impressive photo of something that size, adequate EV. Pine^✉ 07:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
• Very yes! Almost good enough resolution to read the text on the rim of the camera lens in the reflections of the eyes :D -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 16:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Also, I have added this to the Arthropod eye article. Would appreciate if someone could check my caption to make sure it's accurate; I read the Phidippus audax article but I am unfamiliar with the species in general. -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 16:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

• Does "Very yes!" mean Support? You should probably clarify for the closer. Dusty777 16:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

  *sigh* yes.... -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 06:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose Tiny size and easily reproducible with the right equipment. JJ Harrison (talk) 13:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
• Support Impressive. Excellent quality despite the rather small size, good EV. Dusty777 16:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose - I like the image and, while the resolution is small, I don't have an issue with this. My problem is with the images EV. The current lead image far better shows the creature, this one just shows far too little. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

  While I agree the EV is borderline for the species, I added the image to the arthropod eye article, where I believe it has much higher EV. Would you reconsider for this article? -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 06:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• Weak oppose I agree with Peripitus.--GoP_T^C_N 14:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• Support now--GoP_T^C_N 11:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• 'Support This is what people expect to see as FP. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Promoted File:Phidippus audax male.jpg --Julia\^talk 21:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)