Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Featured log/July 2016

Good topic candidates: view - edit - history

U.S. Highways in Michigan

U.S. Highways in Michigan

25 articles

• U.S. Route 2 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 8
• U.S. Route 10 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 12 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 16 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 23 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 24 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 25 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 27 in Michigan

• U.S. Route 31 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 33 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 41 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 45 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 127 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 131
• U.S. Route 141
• U.S. Route 223

• Business routes of U.S. Route 10 in Michigan
• Business routes of U.S. Route 23 in Michigan
• Business routes of U.S. Route 31 in Michigan
• U.S. Route 41 Business (Marquette, Michigan)
• U.S. Route 41 Business (Ishpeming–Negaunee, Michigan)
• Business routes of U.S. Route 127 in Michigan
• Business routes of U.S. Route 131

Contributor(s): Imzadi1979

This is a high-quality, and so far the first of its kind, collection of articles encompassing a single state's components of the national United States Numbered Highway System along with the related business routes, and it follows with Wikipedia:Featured topics/Interstate Highways in Michigan (currently a GT, working on promotion to FT). Unlike that topic, this is already at FT-level content.

This is also the second of the three subtopics about the Michigan State Trunkline Highway System. The other subtopics on Michigan's "plain" state highways will be coming to GTC later this year after another FLC. Once these subtopics are promoted, I plan a FTC using the system article and the four lists of roads in the overall system. (Pure Michigan Byway won't have its own topic.) --Imzadi 1979 → 03:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

• Support - Excellent collection of quality articles on the U.S. Highway System in Michigan that meets the criteria for FT. Dough4872 03:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
• Support - Hits the mark for quality and it looks like it's comprehensive and all encompassing as far as I can tell.  MPJ-DK  21:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
• Support meets the criteria. --Rschen7754 20:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
• Support; excellent topic and meets the criteria. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
• Closed with a consensus to promote to Featured Topic.--十八 21:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

RAAF area commands

RAAF area commands

9 articles

Central Area Command

Eastern Area Command

North-Eastern Area Command

North-Western Area Command

Northern Area Command

Northern Command

Southern Area Command

Western Area Command

Contributor(s): Ian Rose

This topic covers the eight geographically based commands formed by the Royal Australian Air Force during World War II. Five of the formations survived into the early 1950s, when the whole shebang was superseded by a functional command-and-control system made up of Home (operational), Training and Maintenance Commands. I've had this on the boil for a couple of years, originally planning the parent RAAF area commands to be more like a list, with subsections on the individual commands following the overview, but in the end I decided that the commands all justified their own articles and that I might put them together in a GT nom/book when complete. As the last in the series has just passed GAN, here they are... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

• Support, but how come you dint go for a topic on RAAF Command? Nergaal (talk) 01:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Tks. This one seemed a natural, almost like a ship class topic -- I think when you take it up to the RAAF Command level, you're into a a different type of topic, no longer area commands per se, but operational command of the RAAF in the South West Pacific, and just what should belong in such a topic becomes a little more problematic, even for those relatively familiar with the subject...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

• Support: these are all quality articles which work well together as a topic in my opinion. The only thing that leapt out at me was the self pointing redirect for No. 1 Group on Southern Area Command (RAAF). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Tks Rupert, I probably did the same thing with No. 2 Group at Central Area Command -- will rectify both as needed. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
• SUpport - Logical groupings, high quality, all related and actually a clearly defined topic.  MPJ-DK  21:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Tks MJP! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
• Support clearly defined scope, all articles are GA. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Much appreciated, PM. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
• Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. - GamerPro64 21:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Bedtime Stories

Bedtime Stories

5 articles

"Secret"

"Take a Bow"

"Bedtime Story"

"Human Nature"

Contributor(s): IndianBio

I am nominating these series of articles for WP:GT, because they all recently passed WP:GA and I believe they are a comprehensive overview of singer Madonna's Bedtime Stories album era. --—IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

• Support Marvelous job on all the articles (as always). Nothing less was expected from a user like IndianBio. My love is love 20:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
• Support very good work; this deserves to be GT. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
• Support It's a stable Good Topic. The era is definitely done and there would be no more articles to be created for this topic in the future. Well, unless if someone later covers its non-single track and makes it a big hit. Bluesatellite (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • "Human Nature" the Kim-Chi version, lol. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

• Support Great work on all of these articles. This is one of my favorite albums so I greatly appreciated reading through all of these articles. Aoba47 (talk) 00:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
• Support - I can only echo what has already been stated, great work.  MPJ-DK  00:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
• Support - Great work. FrB.TG (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
• Support; awesome topic, well done! - Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
• Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic.--十八 00:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)