Wikipedia:WikiProject North of the Rio Grande

(Redirected from Wikipedia:NRG)
Heading north towards the border

The University of British Columbia's class SPAN322 ("North of the Río Grande: Latin American Civilization and Culture") contributed to Wikipedia during Fall 2008. Our collective goals were to bring a selection of articles on Chicano and Latino literature to featured article status (or as near as possible).

Feel free to discuss this project.

If you have any questions, you can ask them on the project's talk page or at my user talk page.

Goals

edit

News

edit

Articles and groups

edit
edit
  • None yet.

  Good articles

edit

  B-class articles

edit

Groups

edit

Planning and resources

edit

Stages

edit

These are the stages we need to pass through:

  • Start. Get familiar with Wikipedia. Make some trial edits, however minor. Demystify the process. Leave behind any sense of intimidation. As Wikipedia puts it, learn to be bold. Learn basic editing skllls. By September 8, everyone should have sent me their username, added themselves to a group (above) and the membership list (below), plus made at least one edit anywhere on Wikipedia.   Done
  • DYK. Those articles that are eligible for the "Did You Know?" section of the Main Page should be submitted within five days of their creation or first edit. See the DYK rules and this dispatch about DYK. Groups that successfully get their article featured on the "Did You Know?" section of the Main Page will receive extra credit.   Done
  • Plan. But minor edits alone won't get us much closer towards Feature Article status. We need to have a sense of what more needs to be done, and an overall plan for the article. Look at models and guidelines (e.g. guidelines for articles about novels) on how to write good and feature articles. What sections are required? What will be the article structure? What information is needed? By September 19, each group should have their plan in place, and have written it up on their article's talk page.   Done
  • Share. We will need to divide up the tasks that we've identified in the planning stage. Who is going to do what and when?   Done
  • Research. This is vital. A Wikipedia article is worth nothing unless it comprises verified research, appropriated referenced. This will entail going to the library, as well as surfing the internet! It may also require you get books from inter-library loan. By September 26, each group should have assembled a bibliography that is as comprehensive as possible, and written it up on their article's talk page.   Done
  • Continue. This is not a project that can be completed in a rush, as the deadline races up. Wikipedia articles are written in increments, as the result of many edits, often small.

Over the course of the semester, you need to log in and make at least one edit, again however minor, to your article twice a week.

  • Assemble and copy-edit. As the referenced research is added to an article, we need to ensure that it does not become baggy and disorganized, though there will be moments when it is obviously in a transitional stage.
  • Review. First, informal reviews among ourselves and consultation with other Wikipedians. You may then also submit your article to peer review.

By November 10, each group should have submitted their article to Good article nominations.

You may want to leave it at that. Or you may want to continue and work on getting your article featured article status. FA status will earn your group a grade of A+. If you are part of a group that is not submitting to FA, you can now join a group that is, and share in their group grade, so long as you are a full participant in the FA drive.

  • Further Review, both informally and again, perhaps, to peer review.

By November 26, those groups that are submitting their article to featured article candidacy should do so.

There's no precise order for everything. Small, incremental change is always important. But over the course of the project we're looking for radical change, in some cases seeking to create a feature article from scratch. So we need also to be methodical.

NB see also what Wikipedia has to say about article development.

Style guides

edit

To be awarded "good" or "featured" status, articles have to conform to the Wikipedia style guides. The three most important aspects of style are:

Secondary style guide are specific to different projects. Articles must conform to these also. Conflict between any of these is inevitable and troublesome; editors simply have to work out conflicts through consensus.

The simplest way to understand the various style guides is to examine articles that have passed GA or FA. Here is a recently promoted featured article of a novelist: Mario Vargas Llosa. Here are a couple of featured articles of a novel: El Señor Presidente and The General in His Labyrinth. What's more, these three articles were all written by UBC students like you.

Resources

edit

Progress Reports

edit

November 11, 2008

edit

This is our progress since the last update:

The improvement is ongoing and indeed accelerating. Special props perhaps to Team Julia Alvarez and Team Sandra Cisneros, but there's definite progress all around. Still some ways to go, but let's hope that we can continue at this rate and have a few Good Articles by the time of the next update. Well done!

October 28, 2008

edit

This is our progress since the last update:

This is much better. Most of these articles are now motoring, and some of them have come on by leaps and bounds. Moreover, most groups are now firing on all cylinders. Well done!

October 19, 2008

edit

This is our progress since the last update:

Frankly, there are two shocking things here:

  1. that so many of our articles are still at start class, and only two moved up to C class
  2. that not one of our groups is firing on all cylinders; in each group there is at least one person who is not at present pulling his or her weight.

This has to improve!

October 10, 2008

edit

This seems a good time to take stock, now that there should be active editing on all articles. What follows is an account of each article's progress so far this semester:

Clearly some articles have progressed rather more than others. Let's see progress all around!

Statistics

edit

Article traffic

edit

Article traffic statistics indicate the size of the public for our work. Below are the figures for June, 2008. Numbers are likely to go up significantly as the articles improve.

By comparison...

Google page rank

edit

More information to track the significance of this assignment. Below are each article's Google page ranks, using the most likely search parameters.[6]

Members

edit

Co-ordinator

edit

Students

edit

Non-students

edit

We welcome participation and help from other Wikipedia editors. You may wish to add your username below.

  • Awadewit (talk) - Will review and copyedit.
  • Mike Christie (talk)
  • Circeus (talk) - I'll be keeping an eye on the articles, and can help with any questions or copyediting.
  • Karanacs (talk) - Will review, copyedit, answer any questions you might have.
  • Cam (Chat) - Technical copyediting, general logistical support. Don't even hesitate to contact me in the chat-section if you have questions.
  • Moni3 (talk) - The falling into the pit of your stomach feeling after my review will reverse exponentially after you get the bronze star.
  • Ceranthor (talk · contribs) - Copyediting, not with dashes. Good with prose, research, anything else I guess.

Tables

edit

Current assessment (November 19, 2008)

edit
WikiProject:North of the Río Grande article progress assessment [ ]
Home Top High Mid Low
  FA
  GA
Julia Alvarez
Sandra Cisneros
How the García Girls Lost Their Accents
Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
B
José Martí Who Would Have Thought It? Carmen Rodríguez
C
María Ruiz de Burton Tomás Rivera
Start
Chicano literature
Stub

Initial assessment (September 1, 2008)

edit
WikiProject:North of the Río Grande initial article assessment [ ]
Home Top High Mid Low Unassessed
  FA
  GA
B
José Martí
C
Start
Sandra Cisneros
How the García Girls Lost Their Accents
Tomás Rivera
Stub
Unassessed
María Ruiz de Burton
Julia Alvarez
es:José Martí

Redirects or non-existent: Chicano literature, Who Would Have Thought It?, Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories, Carmen Rodríguez.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Total includes Jose Marti.
  2. ^ Total includes How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents.
  3. ^ Total includes Tomas Rivera.
  4. ^ Total includes Mexican American literature.
  5. ^ Total includes Jose Marti.
  6. ^ So I've eliminated quotation marks or accents: Jose Marti rather than "José Martí", for example.
edit
  • North of the Río Grande, retrieved 2008-09-01. Course blog.