Wikipedia

User:Kmweber/Adminship

< User:Kmweber
The correct title of this article is Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kmweber 2. It appears incorrectly here because of technical restrictions.
The correct title of this article is Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Requests for adminship/Kmweber 2. It appears incorrectly here because of technical restrictions.
This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute. Please read this page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure to supply full citations when adding information and consider tagging or removing uncited/unciteable information.
This article mentions elephants but doesn't specify African or Indian.
You can help by specifying which. Please don't be overly precise.

This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page.
You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move this page (without knowing exactly what you are doing), or remove this notice, while the persecution is in progress. For more information, read the Guide to Deletion.

Maintenance use only: Subst either {{subst:mfd}} OR {{subst:mfdx|2nd}} into the page nominated for deletion.
Then subst {{subst:mfd2|pg=User:Kmweber/Adminship|text=...}} into the newly created subpage.
Finally, subst {{subst:mfd3|pg=User:Kmweber/Adminship}} into the log.
Please consider notifying the author(s) by placing {{subst:MFDWarning|User:Kmweber/Adminship}} ~~~~ on their talk page(s).
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 22:59, 1 April 2008.

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Kmweber

edit

2 Voice your opinion (talk page) (77/35/6/2/7/4/5/1/2/3/1/i); Scheduled to end 05:48, 8 April 2078 (UTC){{fakecn}}

Kmweber (talk · contribs) - I am a four-year veteran editor, actively involved in articles relating to the Indiana/Illinois/Kentucky Tri-State Area. I have taken several photographs of the area (see the galleries linked from my userpage), many of which grace the relevant articles. I am well-known throughout Wikipedia for my sane, common-sense approach to article deletion, as well as being one of the most influential voices in the recent evolution of the RfA process. I hope to use my adminship to undo User:Obuibo Mbstpo's block, as well as the blocks on all of that user's other accounts. I also would like to re-welcome User:Karmafist to the community, and perhaps protect Jimbo's user page after redirecting it to Sollog. Or Deep Throat.

Oh. And I definitely want to delete the main page, just for lulz. But that's all I need. I don't need anything else. Except to pull an Uncle Ed and delete AfD, too. But that's all I need--unblocking OM and Karmafist, redirect and protect Jimbo's user page, and delete the main page and AfD, and that's all I need. And putting penis pictures on George W. Bush. Redirecting and protecting Jimbo's user page, unblocking OM and Karmafist, penis pictures, and deleting Main Page and AfD, and that's all I need. I don't need one other thing. Except re-creating the GNAA article. And that's it. I don't need anything el--wait! I want to indef block anyone who votes "Oppose" here! But that's all I need. Eliminating my enemies, re-creating GNAA, unblocking OM and Karmafist, redirecting Jimbo's page, penis pictures, and deleting Main Page and AfD, for sure. And that's it. There's nothing else I need. Except rollback...well, okay, I guess I don't need rollback. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 05:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)— Kmweber (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.





Questions for the candidate

edit

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: Mostly, I want to use the banhammer to bludgeon newbies into agreeing with me. They need to learn their place, see. We need to beat them down before they get uppity. Gotta keep the n00b in the ditch where he belongs, totally.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: I'm quite proud of [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], and [8], which were all major spelling corrections to the previously-morphologically-unsound Michael J. Fox and Joan Rivers articles. Just unintelligible junk, really--just pure crap. Until I heroically swooped in and saved the day. But those damn notorious vandals Adam Bishop and Drop Dead Gorgias, who were at the time both engaging in harassing wikistalking of me, had to go and screw it up again, and they're totally responsible for those articles being in the horrific state they're in today.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Usually, whenever I have a problem with someone I ask my good buddy Daniel Brandt to track him (it's always a him, everyone knows there are no women on the Internet) down and, after a series of escalating threats, I challenge him to a duel. Pistols at fifty paces. Riana is usually my second, although Gmaxwell has had to fill in at times when Riana was drunk or committed...which, actually, I guess is like 97% of the time. So I guess Gmaxwell is effectively my regular second...I need to get that changed in the records. He'll want the fringe benefits, I'm sure. Shit.

Oh, and once I just sicced Anthere on someone. But that was a major lapse in judgment, and I won't ever do it again. Pinky swear. Unless someone just really gets my goat up. Like, for instance, if you vote oppose here. That might piss me off. Just a bit.

I've found thinly-veiled innuendoes and insinuations of autosexuality or pachyderm ancestry also work to amicably resolve a dispute--but only as a last resort, of course.

Optional questions by Cobi

4. Do you view all self nominations as prima facie evidence of power hunger?
A.
5. If so, why?
A.

Optional Question from Useight

6. How many cups of sugar does it take to get to the moon?
A:

Not-so-optional question from DarkFalls

7.Do you scrunch or fold?
A:

Non-optional question from User Talk:Yngvarr

8. What is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
A:
Comment - is that the African swallow? Or the European swallow? The public face of GBT/C 12:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Optional answer from Tivedshambo

9. A: What is the difference between a WP:CLOCK and a WP:CAN?
Q:

Optional option from Redvers

10. Q: Breast or leg?
A:

Optional (as in "answer, or we send you into outer space") question from the High inquisitor

11. How can we be sure that you are not a Cylon?


Optional questions from Ddstretch

12. Q: Today whilst walking in my garden, I heard a cuckoo. Since I have never heard one so early in the year, I was wondering if you knew whether this was a record?
A:
13. Q: Today whilst rummaging throuigh some boxes, I found a flat black plastic-like disk with a hole in its centre, two spiralling lines going in from the outside, one per side, and two paper disks in the center of each side. Since I have never seen one of these so late in my life, I was wondering if you knew whether this was a record?
A:

Optional question from Elkman

14. Q: Is sysop pronounced "SIGH-sop" or "SISS-op"?
A:

Mandatory questions from 68.237.239.228 (talk)

15. Q: What is the weather in London (talk) right now? If you could control the weather there, what would you do? If you lived in London, would that make you a better admin? Explain in detail, including your sources.

Notice from Requests for Adminship

16.
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I, Requests for adminship (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC), Hereby award Kmweber the Tireless Contributors Barnstar for his contributions to the Requests for Adminship process.

Optional Questions from Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles

17. All of the following accounts were blocked as socks or puppet masters: AndalusianNaugahyde, AshbyJnr, Blueanode, Brandon97, Burntsauce, Casperonline, Dannycali, Davenbelle, Diyarbakir, D73733C8-CC80-11D0-B225-00C04FB6C2F5, Eyrian, Gazpacho, Golfcam, IPSOS, Jack Merridew, JohnEMcClure, LAZY 1L, Moby Dick, Mrs random, Note to Cool Cat, 75.5.225.151, SolidPlaid, Varlak, and Yeshivish. As the block logs indicate, these accounts used sockpuppetry and harassment of editors in order to get over two hundred popular culture related articles deleted from Wikipedia, including those indicated in this list that one of the banned accounts wrote. Even if you personally want those articles deleted, do the ends justify the means? What if anything could or should be done to reverse what they did and to send a message that sockpuppetry and harassment will not succeed on Wikipedia?

Mandatory questions from Antonio Lopez

18. Q: Can you play the twelve major, minor, harmonic minor and other scales on the Euphonium
A:


19. Q: Do you know the difference between the Euphonium and the Baritone horn.
A:
20. Q: Do you enjoy playing the Euphonium.
A:
21. Q: Did you ever play a Baritone horn.
A:
22. Q: Do you have a compensating Euphonium.
A:
23. Q: Have you ever used a Euphonium as a weapon.
A:
24. Q: How many valves does a compensating Euphonium have.
A:
25. Q: Did you ever edit the Euphonium article or baritone horn article.
A:
26. Q: Why won't you answer the questions?
A:
27. Q: Are you real?
A:
42. Q: What is the Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything?
A:

General comments

edit
RfAs for this user:

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Kmweber before commenting.

Discussion

edit
Where Is The Bathroom
edit

Per WP:Ignore All Rules, I say that this is The Worst April's fool joke ever, So Move

Support
edit
  1. This request is prima-whatever evidence of wanting to help out! Sure. SQLQuery me! 06:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Support - it's verifiable that he exists, and that ought to be the only criterion for adminship. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    So what about my big toe? It exists, should it be an admin? Or Hitler? Or Wolfram? Or Raptor Jesus? Glassviper (talk) 06:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Yes, of course. Why not? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Just a few !votes in, and we've already got a semi-invocation of Goodwin's Law. Heh. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Hitler is dead[citation needed], he doesn't exist, and can therefore no longer be an admin. Unless someone time travels him back to the present, alive and wholesome, of course. · AndonicO Hail! 08:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    [citation needed] Snowolf How can I help? 06:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Maybe these guys can help? --Kim Bruning (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Support Great answers. MBisanz talk 06:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Cross-voting bastard I am :) —Dark talk 06:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC) — DarkFalls (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  5. We need more power hunger here on the administrative team. krimpet✽ 06:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Speedy Promote per SNOW. --JayHenry (talk) 06:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  7. Support A voice of reason in the wilderness... Hmmm... Spartaz Humbug! 06:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  8. Support Passes WP:BIO per here and here. Davewild (talk) 06:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  9. Suppport - definitely need more power hunger per krimpet. Sceptre (talk) 07:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  10. Support — I view power-hunger as prima facie evidence of being a suitable admin candidate. --Haemo (talk) 07:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  11. Support - his tireless contributions to RfA discussions demonstrate his maturity. Give him the chainsaw. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  12. Strong Support After revewing the candidate's contribution history I believe I have found strong evidence that giving Kurt sysop tools will be a newly minted User:Pedro/Net Positive 2 TM Pedro :  Chat  07:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  13. You want Power? Have 'em, we don't want 'em. ~ Riana ⁂ 07:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  14. Support Kurt does a lot more around here than a lot of people, and puts up with ridiculous amounts of crap he doesn't deserve. Jmlk17 08:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  15. Does good work. Rudget. 08:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  16. Support — I view self-effacing humour as prima facie evidence of being a jolly good chap. (Go Kurts!) —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 09:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  17. Support Just adminship?? Please go directly to WP:Requests for Stewardship and post a self nom there! κaτaʟavenoTC 09:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  18. Support See reasoning under my struck Skippy the Bush Kangaroo ¡vote!, below. Darkspots (talk) 09:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  19. — Werdna talk 09:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  20. Keep Good user. Won't abuse the tools. Hans Adler (talk) 10:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  21. Support as a banned user, I'd like to say support (so someone can strike my vote). --87.113.3.179 (talk) 11:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  22. Support Finally someone who will make some progress on the project. --Charitwo talk 11:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  23. Support, obviously. No evidence he will abuse the tools more often than several times daily. No big deal, right? Guy (Help!) 11:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Strike vote, see oppose below. Guy (Help!) 11:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  24. Support- self-nomination is an obvious sign that someone lives for the wiki. special, random, Merkinsmum 12:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  25. Sounds good! We need more abusive admins. Majorly (talk) 12:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  26. Support - if Kurt cannot be an admin, the terrorists have won. Has at least one "e" in his user name, thus meeting my criterion. Neıl ☎ 12:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  27. Strongest Possible support - wow atlast the most perfect candidate, he will most definitely abuse the tool and most probably delete the Main Page more than once in his life and will most definitely get Pwnt!! over and over again and when he isn't being a PITA, he will get nommed for President of the United States and might just win due to his Prima-facie attitude, and will end Global Warming and World Hunger..ahh this is for sysops rights..oops..OK Support..I trust this user to abuse the tools, Give it now...before he becomes a Monk and preaches on World Peace...--Cometstyles 12:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  28. Featured admin per WP:IAR -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me Articles touched by my noodly appendage 12:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  29. Support per Neil. Yoda 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  30. Support per Neil. Obi 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  31. Support per Neil. Darth 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  32. Support per Neil. C3PO 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  33. Support per Neil. Luke 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  34. Support per Neil. Leia 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  35. Support per Neil. Han 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  36. Support per Neil. Chewie 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  37. Support per Neil. Matthew 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  38. Support per Neil. Mark 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  39. Support per Neil. Luke 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  40. Support per Neil. John 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  41. Support per Neil. Sleepy 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  42. Support per Neil. Happy 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  43. Support per Neil. Bashful 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  44. Support per Neil. Doc 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  45. Support per Neil. Sneezey 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  46. Support per Neil. Grumpy 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  47. Support per Neil. Dopey 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  48. Support per Neil. Rita 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  49. Support per Neil. Sue 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  50. Support per Neil. And 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  51. Support per Neil. Bob 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  52. Support per Neil. Too 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  53. Support per Neil. Jesus 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  54. Support per Neil. Jimmy Wales 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  55. Support per Neil. Gregory Kohs 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  56. Support per Neil. Daniel Brandt 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  57. Support per Neil. Don Murphy 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  58. Support per Neil. Priscilla, Queen of the Desert 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  59. Support per Neil. Simon 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  60. Support per Neil. Garfunkel 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  61. Support per Neil. Salt 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  62. Support per Neil. Pepa 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  63. Support per Neil. Pepsi 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  64. Support per Neil. Shirley 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    I know for a fact that four of the Seven Dwarves (I refuse to say which ones) were canvassed here via e-mail and feel their votes should thus be taken with a grain of salt or possibly a simple "Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho." Also, based on some cursory time-stamp analysis/thoroughgoing Biblical exegesis, it appears that Matthew and Luke are synopticpuppets of Mark. As this seems to be the first evidence of abuse I think a warning would be sufficient.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 13:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Maybe it’s just me, but it looks like all of the above users !voting “per Neil” are actually sockpuppets of User:Neil. Also, User:Luke !voted twice. It could be that those are two different Lukes, though. —Travistalk 21:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  65. Weak support for coherence. The inexplicable nagging suspicion that it's a joke throws me off a little. Dorftrottel (harass) 12:49, April 1, 2008
  66. Weak Support. Clearly needs the tools, my only real criterion. Also, per Pepsi and (especially) Shirley, above. The fact that he did not feel compelled to oppose my first, self-nom'd RfA stung a little (hence the weak support), but not enough to force me to go neutral or anything drastic like that. --barneca (talk) 13:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  67. Support, per all the Neils. It is April 1 after all and this is great! I would btw support Kurt as an admin if it werent't! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 13:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC) This vote is invalid because the user is a sockpuppet of Eunuch, Eunuch 06 and Eunuch 1. See [9] for evidence (third paragraph). --Hans Adler (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    I am their representative, and speak for them all as a collective. So count my vote as many! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  68. Strong support only because you suckered me... Balloonman (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  69. Strong support per desire to delete AfD and unblock Obuibo Mbstpo. After all..."All things must be examined, debated, investigated without exception and without regard for anyone's feelings." - Denis Diderot explaining the goal of the Encyclopedia Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 13:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  70. Support, but do try to be a little more subtle next year. — CharlotteWebb 13:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  71. Spurt per the_undertow Lara❤Love 14:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  72. Should support because it says on the talk page "number of RfA's opposed: all". That shows commitment to the project. 68.237.239.228 (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  73. EUPHONIUM! [neutrality is disputed][citation needed] Antonio Lopez (talk) 14:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  74. The nomination we've all been waiting for! Acalamari 15:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  75. Support — I view a sense of humour as prima facie evidence of being human. Since WP:RFA is WP:NOBIGDEAL, there's more than enough here to support. Jimbo Wales
  76. Support — I view an April Fool's Day self-nom as prima facie evidence of taking the piss. EJF (talk) 16:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  77. Support, due to excellent answer to Q1 and self nom.--Fabrictramp (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  78. Support Changed to support. per Jimbo. (lol) Thingg⊕⊗ 17:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  79. Support I get to vote today to make a point. What the point is, I forgot, or maybe I never knew in the first place, but, never mind. Please refer to my complete essay on this topic, which is incorporated by reference.--Abd (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  80. Opport very strong weakly. Mazca (talk) 21:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  81. Support I am supporting because you promised to unblock me. Willy on Wheels 23:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  82. SuperSupport. I support the libertarian as new Wikipe-God. :-DDD
Oppose
edit
  1. I view self nominations as the...well, you get it. John Reaves 06:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    What? Meh. I hope the crats assign an appropriate weight to this !vote! SQLQuery me! 06:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    ZOMG, you're harassing the opposers! Someone indef block SQL, quick! Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 21:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Oppose — I view self-noms as prima facie evidence of power hunger.™ —Dark talk 06:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Note to crats: this editor appears to be commiting plagiarism. I propose hitting this user with the banhammer, or at least throwing the banwrench at him and watching him jump. --JayHenry (talk) 06:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    teh infamous unblockhammer will get me out of trouble —Dark talk 07:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Also, per not being Jimbo, and for not having 100,000,000 edits. —Dark talk 06:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Oppose Lack of contributions in the MediaWiki: namespace. Snowolf How can I help? 06:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - I don't care about self noms. However, your introduction/answers to questions are frivolous and altogether absurd. You also lack experience in article building, and your project space contributions do not impress me. Wisdom89 (T / C) 06:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????John Reaves 06:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Do you have an actual question or comment? Wisdom89 (T / C) 06:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    —Dark talk 06:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    !@#$ !!! Orderinchaos 06:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Strong oppose. I was going to say the above, but it's already been said on previous occasions. This editors constant posting of I view self noms as prima facie evidence of power hunger, is a blatant unwillingness to assume good faith, and has opposed many RFAs, in this fashion, without any further discussion or comments. I cannot support any admin hopeful displaying behaviour such as the candidate. Ad additionally, them self-nomming themself goes against everything they stand for. If self-nomming is evidence of power hunger, then what exactly is this nomination about? I am more than willing to further comment regarding my oppose, if it is required. Steve Crossin (talk to me) 06:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    And also per his answers to Question one. Very amusing joke. Lulz.Steve Crossin (talk to me) 06:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Oppose Not a member of the cabal, also has created no featured portals, which is clearly a necessary criterion of adminship. Orderinchaos 06:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  7. Oppose Not enough posts on the mailing list. Also fails my basic requirement of at least 25 FAs and 7 years of experience. EconomicsGuy (talk) 06:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  8. Oppose because I have a headache today. --Calton | Talk 06:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  9. Oppose per my longstanding policy of opposing the RfA's of editors who don't know what the goddamn Tri-State Area is. Indiana/Illinois/Kentucky? My eye! Everyone knows it's New Jersey/New York/Connecticut. Except not Connecticut - to hell with that place (not that that would be a big change from where it is now...zing!). If nom (or his surrogates) tells three Indiana jokes in the next 24 hours I will reconsider my !vote since everything else looks spot on.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    1. We named the dog Indiana! – Luna Santin (talk) 06:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    I thought it was Alaska, Hawaii, and Iraq^H^H^H^H American Samoa. — CharlotteWebb 14:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  10. Oppose No evidence that the user is endorsed by a WikiProject. Mr.Z-man 06:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  11. Oppose. Wow, this RFA is amazingly fun to read. The self-nom is so ironic. What a great thing to do on April Fool's Day. Answers to questions are hilarious. Useight (talk) 06:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  12. Oppose. Way too deletionist if he wants to delete the Main Page. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  13. I view self-noms as prima-facie evidence of power hunger. ;D OK, seriously. I personally would not oppose a candidate just for a personal belief, but seeing as how this is a self-nom, and especially given certain cases of incivility, I am going to have to oppose this nom. Valtoras (talk) 08:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Oh, it's an April Fools joke! I shoulda known! XD Actually, about the Karmafist being welcomed back thing, I am actually not immensely opposed to that, so long as he promises not to do what got him banned in the first place again. Valtoras (talk) 08:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  14. Oppose. For the sake of the users who voted under here. Chenzw (talk · contribs) 08:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chenzw (talk • contribs)
  15. Macaroni & Cheese This user is not disruptive enough of the RfA process to warrant a rouge promotion. He also is in serious need of variety in his blanket nonsensical opposes. Thanks for playing. GlassCobra 08:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  16. Oppose, per Star Trek. · AndonicO Hail! 09:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  17. Oppose - I respect DMHO's essay greatly. But the hypocrisy so evident here made me laugh hard, and so I oppose with unending strength. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  18. Oppose the fact that this user is even considering adminship at all indicates the decadence and degradation of WIkipedia today. They have a mere 2 portal talk edits, no help talk edits and - this is the shocking part - no Mediawiki space edits at all. Hut 8.5 09:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  19. — Werdna talk 09:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  20. Oppose Severe lack of article building. Only 1739 main space edits [10]. Sorry, I have to oppose in this case. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  21. Kill The lack of pages moves makes me believe this user is not ready for main page deletion. -- lucasbfr talk 11:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  22. Oppose. I just noticed he mentioned Michael J Fox. We just don't need that kind of language. Think of the children! Guy (Help!) 11:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  23. Oppose - the answers given to questions appear to be nothing but a joke; directly stating he would abuse the power and vandalize Wikipedia. KV(Talk) 12:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Really? Neıl ☎ 12:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    No, this is just a viscious personal attack. Where's my banhammer at? WilyD 15:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  24. Support per KV. BTW, is this the right section? SynergeticMaggot (talk) 12:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  25. Oppose: I see no evidence of repeated threats to take legal action against wikipedia or any of its editors, either on this site or elsewhere. Consequently, this editor cannot have a broad enough experience of all aspects of wikipedia use or administration from all viewpoints. If they would care to make a few threats in the forthcoming months, I would be happy to support a resubmitted nomination once the resulting bans are overturned.  DDStretch  (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  26. Oppose: No endorsements from WikiProjects. 78.86.18.55 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  27. Oppose: Candidate has no intention to recreate the Last Measure article. aliasd·U·T 13:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  28. Oppose Candidate can't even decide whether the best target to redirect Jimbo Wales is Sollog or Deep Throat. We need admins with more confidence in their own judgment. Pascal.Treason (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  29. Oppose Candidate’s signature pushes a non-neutral POV (which happens to be in conflict with my POV). Also, I was disappointed to see that he didn’t have any edits to BJAODN. Besides, he had the nerve to not give me a support !vote in my RfA. —Travistalk 14:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC) [neutrality is disputed]
  30. Oppose - He didn't give me crack. He owes me crack. He likes crack more than I do. Crack makes him oppose. Get crack off of Kurt's street and maybe he'll be more logical... and nice. He likes crack a lot. I need crack. Hmm... Give Kurt a mop made out of crack. Scarian is a crack whoreWill give barnstars for crack 14:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  31. Oppose WANT CHEEZBURGER INSTEAD. -Pilotguy contact tower 14:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  32. Strong Oppose Candidate ignored my mandatory questions. 68.237.239.228 (talk) 14:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  1. Oppose, I view self-noms prime facie as evidence of power hunger. Also I don't trust users with blue signatures. Though I may reconsider since the Colts are decent. Wizardman 15:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

87. The Colts? Seriously? Come on now... More Mediawiki edits needed. — Scientizzle 15:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

  1. Oppose I view self-noms as prima facie evidence of wanting to be Dr. Evil - TheProf - T / C 15:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Oppose, 9999 Portal talk edits simply don't meet my standards. If there were 10,000, I might consider... Also, only 5 google hits. --Tone 16:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Oppose Not enough template-space editsvandalism. — Edokter • Talk • 19:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Oppose. I view the existance of a request for adminship as prima facie evidence of power hunger. --Carnildo (talk) 20:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Oppose – User submitted this RfA at a time when I could not (or forgot to) respond. Everyone's opinion deserves to be heard. —Animum (talk) 03:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete
edit
  1. Delete Fails WP:BAND SQLQuery me! 06:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    Darn it, now I have to clean the spew off my monitor!--Fabrictramp (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Not enough edits, fails WP:N Orderinchaos 06:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. — Werdna talk 09:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete nn admin-cruft clogging up the encyclopedia. Ursasapien (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete per Ursa :( Elfits (klat) 10:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Per your mom. Malinaccier Public (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  7. Delete. You fucking rick rolled me.. Jack?! 02:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep
edit
  1. Keep Kurt exists, therefore this RfA should exist as well. Darkspots (talk) 10:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    [citation needed] - Martinp23 12:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

#Keep. I couldn't agree more. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 12:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)This user voted twice. See here for more information. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 12:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep per my reasoning in the RfA. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep per me. Refer to my entry here for argument. --Abd (talk) 19:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Keep per User:Crispy1989. —na na na na hey hey hey goodbye ćŕáźýtáĺéśPIE JESU DOMINE *SMACK* DONA EIS REQUIEM *SMACK* dessicated fish. 19:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral
edit
The neutrality of this section is explicitly not even vaguely disputed. That's the point of a neutral section.
Please don't bother looking at the discussion on the talk page.
  1. It would be rude of me to not vote. east.718 at 06:14, April 1, 2008
  2. Was eager to support after reading nom statement and responses to questions, but lack of MediaWiki namespace edits gives me pause. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Pending answers to Q4 and Q5. -- Cobi(t|c|b) 07:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Undecided – I am so confused today - do I support for a great contributions or Oppose because of self nomination or support because of great answers or oppose because people I respect Oppose or support because of humor or oppose because does not take project serious or support because longevity or oppose because of just because. Please help me to decide! :-)…. ShoesssS Talk 09:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    When in doubt, delete is always the right answer. Snowolf How can I help? 10:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. — Werdna talk 10:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Neutral per Luna. Soxred93 | talk bot 16:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  7. I view self-noms as prima facie evidence of something. Of what, I'm not sure, so I'm voting Neutral. Ral315 (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  8. Imagine a Clueless Barnstar here. — Athaenara ✉ 19:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  9. If going down a hill. Why? Xavexgoem (talk) 20:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
edit
  1. Lulz. Orderinchaos 06:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. I oppose this summary as I feel a KENTUCKYFRIEDCHICKEN will be more fattening. —Dark talk 06:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Oppose the use of Lulz. :) Rudget. 08:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Toby is Skippy's friend. Kingturtle (talk) 12:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
prima facie evidence of hunger
edit
  1. Mc Donalds. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 07:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Prima Facie. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC).
  3. Prima Donna user:Nobody 11:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Prima Rk user:Nobody else 11:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Louis Prima —Travistalk 14:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Prime rate. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Chavvy reasons
edit
  1. Strong oppose or something or nothing -- No but, yeah but, no but yeah but, if ya gonna bitch around then your way gonna get beatings right, cause I never not even done nothing or nothing because let me tell you the whole thing right, because Michelle Bingham, who’s a complete bitch anyway has been completely going around saying that I went into Shelley Thackerell’s bag, and nicked a bottle of Cinzano, but I never, but I did, but only cause you’re not actually supposed to have alcohol on school grounds, actually and I was gonna give it to Miss Turvey, but I forgot and drank it, and I only got found out cause I was getting off with Asif Shar behind the language lab and I was sick in his mouth. But if youve been talking to Aaron Peal then dont listen to him 'coz Aaron Peal is like a total batty boy, and he ain’t got no pubes, and he’s well out of order cause he’s been completely going around saying that I like smoke and drank when I was pregnant, but all I did was smoke like two packets of fags a day, drink like fifty pints of Snakebite, but apart from that I never done nothing, so you can well shut up you total minger! User:Vicky_Pollard
The M3 money supply of Zimbabwe
edit
  1. Support the robbing of said supply. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 11:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    I have already stolen MILLIONS! aliasd·U·T 13:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. ONE MILION ZIMBABWAN DOLLARS Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Grawp
edit
  1. Hagger? The public face of GBT/C 12:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Move to HAGGER??? Soxred93 | talk bot 12:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Smerge to USS Haggard (DD-555) per above. PhilKnight (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Ontology Recapitulates Philology
edit
  1. Who needs Pharyngeal arches anyway Support -- Avi (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Indefinite block review
edit

Given the obvious prediliction towards vandalism ([11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], and [18]), I have blocked this account and deleted all the editor's userpages. — Scientizzle 15:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Polls are evil
edit
  • Obligatory Polls are evil poll option. ;-) --Kim Bruning (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Bigger icon needed
edit

The April Fools icon at top right is too small. Anyone know how to change it? Where is it coming from anyway? What needs editing? Carcharoth (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

 Done It's bigger! Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 Done two more added per request, looks like the Triforce... ...wait you did not ask for two more... Antonio Lopez (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Contested????
edit

<sob> No-one will see my joke! (the funny bit was at the bottom, for those who weren't fooled). Anyway, how can it be contested? Didn't anyone see the edict by Jimbo? We have all been made bureaucrats for the day!! I'm going to petulently close this request again and protect the page! :-) (BTW, the real trick is to start off serious, like Kurt did, and only later go all silly). Carcharoth (talk) 16:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

WHAT? I saw it. I'm looking at all the changes made to this page. I don't think this met the proper percentage. Plus, I'm not even sure you're a 'crat. I'll have your tools yet! 68.237.239.228 (talk)
Move
edit
  1. Move to User:Kmweber ON WHEELS!!! Liam ar Rothaí 20:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Move to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kmweber 2 ON WHEELS!!! Antonio Lopez (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kmweber/Adminship&oldid=1085467587"