Hello Wikipedia,

Thanks for allowing me to finally create an account here and contribute in my own little way. I have a master's degree in Journalism and 10 years' experience in online and print publication. I do hope to allocate most of my free time editing and contributing new articles. It's really splendid to finally start this long-planned endeavor. Word.Farmer02 (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Word.Farmer02, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Word.Farmer02! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Paul Tyma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cyan Gardevoir (used EDIT!) 01:24, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

edit

Hello, Word.Farmer02, I got your message on my talk page. I have gone ahead and removed the redirect from your sandbox. In the future, all you need to do is navigate to that page (your sandbox) and erase what you find there. Just be careful not to erase the article instead :) Thanks for your contributions! I look forward to your future articles. heather walls (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Face lift dentistry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

heather walls (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Word.Farmer02! I went ahead and made a few small changes to your article and accepted it. There are a few notes at the top, one indicates that there are too many links, you could probably remove some of them (things that people already understand, like mouth, and linking the same word repeatedly). Please in the future ask your questions of the friendly hosts at the Teahouse as I tend to have very little free time to answer right away. Happy editing! heather walls (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Spjærøy Church was accepted

edit
 
Spjærøy Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 10:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it. Sorry for the error I did when I mistakenly changed the contents of my Sandbox when I first tried to contribute this new article, which is actually a revised, improved version in English of an article originally in the Norwegian Wikipedia. More new article contributions to come. Best regards to you and to all.Word.Farmer02 (talk) 09:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Kanban Tool has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kanban Tool. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 21:40, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kanban Tool has been accepted

edit
 
Kanban Tool, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

(tJosve05a (c) 21:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kanban Tool for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kanban Tool is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanban Tool (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nils Jensen Ytteborg has been accepted

edit
 
Nils Jensen Ytteborg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paul Tyma for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Tyma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Tyma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stlwart111 07:37, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have to ask...

edit

I've been looking at a bunch of your contributions, one of which I just nominated for deletion and another which is now at WP:FRINGE/N. Were you paid to create the articles you have created? There are about a very disparate range of topics but each seems to have the same problems - promotional language, disingenuous sourcing and major WP:WEIGHT issues. I've worked with paid editors a lot and these are all hallmarks of paid editing. It's worth noting that paid editing isn't prohibited here, but conflict of interest declarations are encouraged and dishonesty and sneaky promotionalism are frowned upon. I'm happy to help and I don't care if that means helping someone to make money (so that we're clear). But the articles you've created are going to be deleted unless you pay attention to how they are created. Stlwart111 07:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ytteborg Brewery has been accepted

edit
 
Ytteborg Brewery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply