User talk:RHaworth/2013 May 09

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

wikify!

Slovenly is a word I find myself using quite a bit at the moment. Slovenly is what I think of anybody who leaves a message here about an article and fails to provide a wikilink to the article. How do you expect me to read the article if you don't link to it?
I reserve the right to ignore any message which does not provide links where appropriate or has not been signed with ~~~~. Even if the article has been deleted, you should still link to it.
And if that sounds like a grumpy old man, it's because I am ...

The Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Deletion

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Josef Rosch Image deletion

Hi, I uploaded File:Josef Rösch.jpg for an article on Josef Rosch. It was tagged for speedy deletion because of some sort of "copyright infringement." However, I replied that not only do I have permission from the copyright owner (Dotter Institute) but that I can provide it if necessary. So, why was the file deleted and how can I avoid getting it deleted in the future?

My plan is actually to use a different, higher quality photo. I also will have copyright authority for this image. What sort of documentation do you want to prevent a deletion? Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caspace3 (talk • contribs)

• You had put an absolute minimum of effort into preparing the image description:

{{Information |Description = Photo of Josef Rösch |Source = Available online |Author = Dotter Institute |Permission = Evidence: Will be provided on request. }} ==Licensing== Free use for wikipedia.

Description - could have linked to the article about the guy. "Available online" - disgusting - provide a link to it! "Will be provided on request" - no! - evidence must be provided at the time of upload. "Free use for wikipedia" - hopelessly vague - we need a proper Creative Commons licence. And we definitely want a decent size article instead of the thumbnail you supplied. If the new image is available online and has an appropriate CC licence attached, simply upload it here, point out that the source has a CC licence and reproduce that licence here. Failing that, read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. By the way, chill out. Most of those "hopelessly vague" and "disgusting" inputs are default options that Wikipedia has. That said, I'll get the next photo hopefully up to speed and appreciate your help on it. The low res photo was just there temporarily, to be replaced when i get the better photo. As Wikipedia is a medium for articles which are continuously updated and improved, it did not seem inappropriate to me to do that. However, I admire your passion for quality and adherence to the rules. Caspace3 (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

• The most important error in the description, "free use for wikipedia" did not come from a default option. But what I want you to note is that when you have the replacement, it should be uploaded to the Commons, not to here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Djing

User RHowarth .... I am user SubVersion Kru ...... i don't really understand your wish to have the entry 'dj spice' removed. I am conducting research for a piece on the the last great youth movement... the acid house scene, looking at not only what helped create the scene, but also a little about the people who were behind creating it....... if you had any knowledge of this matter, and i am sure you don't...... you would know that the gentleman the entry was descibing, Mr Barry Dossett, played a major part in the creation of this movement.........I am new to using wikipedea, so please if it has been removed for any valid reason, please forgive me, otherwise, and i'm not really sure how this works, but could you please withdraw your unfounded application for removal....... we live in an information age.....and at last count, history was part of that......in fact as somebody that has been closely connected with music and youth culture on many levels, i'm a little dumbfounded. please help me understand. thank you....

• See #wikify above. No link, unsigned, originally posted in the wrong place, can't even get my name right. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

CSD Arctic cross article

The Arctic cross article was recently deleted by you. Please would you userfy that page for me? Thanks Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 18:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

• I don't see the point - there was so little in it. But restored to User:Kinkreet/sandbox. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

list of school cheating scandal

Not quite sure where the speedy deletion came from, and lack of time (<24 hours) for me to respond I take it you agree that notability is not an issue; I gather from the notices that you seem to think the article was not well written enough ? yours cinnamon colbert PS: I put a lot of work into gathering all those urls; how do i get them back ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 01:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• Please read #wikify above. You could not even create a link when you did this edit. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

The Boys Initiative page

It appears that you may have asked for a speedy delete on my pages Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Boys Initiative, the boys initiative and The Boys Initiative. Is that true, and if so, why? Thank you, Dennis Barbour, Washington DC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennisbarbour (talk • contribs) 03:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• See #wikify above and my previous two links to it. Count yourself lucky to be receiving a reply. No, I did not ask for deletion - three different people requested deletion. I merely agreed with those people and carried out the deletions. You have declared your strong COI to me and I say: kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your organisation is notable and writes about it here. It was an article spammy in tone, cluttered with external links but devoid of independent references. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

The Sticking Point Solution Page

Hi - Do you think you "userfy" "The Sticking Point Solution" so that I am able to edit and view changes of the page in a private space before officially publishing it? Thank you, Mellyp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mellyp7 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• Being a jaded old cynic, I automatically assume that a first time editor writing a faintly spammy article must have a COI. The most I will do is e-mail you the text, so read this. If you attempt to re-submit, before you do so, please learn: not to vandalise user talk pages as you did with this edit, to use wikilinks not external links and not to put " around titles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
• Oh dear, some soft-hearted admin has userfied it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Moses Sachs article deletion

Hello, I created (translated, actually) the article about Moses Sachs which was speedly deleted for not indicating the importance or significance of the subject. I am new to wikipedia and I was wondering what was I supposed to do in order to indicate the importance of the subject (who is, well, pretty important). If this is not the place to ask this please direct me to the right one. Ey nir (talk) 15:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

• Do the words "links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" suggest anything to you? You put several wikilinks in the article (which is good). Did you notice that each of the articles to which you linked has sections near the end called "References" and "External links"? Restored to User:Ey nir/sandbox. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello again, So I added the references to the secondary sources (two articles and a book, so far) and again you deleted the page. What's wrong with it? By the way it would be much more helpful if some experienced user actually explained what is the problem and suggested improvements instead of just deleting the page. Ey nir (talk) 10:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Inline citations would be a start.--Launchballer 12:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

• Again you accuse me of deletion. Will you please learn to read logs and edit histories - which of your edits have I ever deleted? Please reply. The Wikipedia motto is "be bold" instead of moaning at me as above, you should have moved the article back to Moses Sachs and pointed out to me that you had provided references. But I would still like to see references in English and on-line - preferably both. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

William Leveson/recycle

Hello RH, could you send me a dump of the history from William Leveson/recycle before it was deleted. I'm trying to debug what occurred in order to reply accurately at User talk:Technical_13#Declined_speedy (last two paragraphs). AFAICT it was not actually what RedRose suggested since this was probably a WP:MOR. —Sladen (talk) 17:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Seems to also have been raised at WP:HD#Eliminating a redirect. —Sladen (talk) 19:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

• Restored! Mark it for deletion again when you have enjoyed it. Seems to have been part of a cack-handed attempt to move William Leveson (mercer) to William Leveson. There was a message "using method suggested by RedRose (talk · contribs)" - weird RedRose has never done any edits. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

File talk:Diocese of Norwich map 1.png

Hello, you deleted the File talk:Diocese of Norwich map 1.png because it met the requirements for speedy deletion. Just to let you know the User that created it, 24.61.65.207 (talk) ( contribs) , has just recreated it. I am not an administrator and therefore can not delete it. The User has a history of bad editing (creating inappropriate pages, vandalism). Just to let you know, Cheers, King of Nothing (talk) 23:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

IPs can't upload images?--Launchballer 06:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

• Launchballer, yes IPs cannot upload. This was an unimportant talk page message which was in the wrong place because the image is on Commons. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Jayneshill.jpg

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I undid your deletion of this file. If you look at the deleted file description from the original upload and the metadata listed on the page, you will see that that image was created and uploaded to Wikipedia in 2010. The website that also hosts the same image posted it in 2011, thus meaning it was taken from Wikipedia and posted to the website without proper attribution. Let me know if you have any questions! Best, Mike V • Talk 02:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

• Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Advice

Hi Roger. I hope you don't mind a quick deletion question. I deleted this sandbox: User:Yolobuttercheese/sandbox earlier, but it was restored because G2 doesn't apply to sandboxes. I'm up on that now, but I wonder if G3 would apply to a page like this? I want to make sure I handle these properly when I come across them in future. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 22:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Talk page stalker comment; I'm fairly sure that as that is inoffensive the only justification for it being deleted is author request, which doesn't apply here.--Launchballer 22:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

The page was not bad enough to qualify for deletion but if I found it at CAT:CSD, I would have deleted it as the quickest way of getting it out of the category. Unfortunately Fram (talk · contribs) has an obsession that deletions must be done in strict conformance with his perception of the rule book. For example he insisted on restoring lives and portraits of all the presidents from Washington to Grant even though he knew full well that it was likely to fail an AfD discussion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Userfy please?

Could you please userfy the version of Maggie Shah (at User:SamanaShrestha/Maggie Shah) that was deleted so the editor, whom I helped, has a chance to work on the draft and find sources? Thanks. Ganesh Paudel (talk) 13:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

• Dubious notability. Text e-mailed instead. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

No emails received yet.--Ganesh Paudel (talk) 11:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

• I have re-emailed. The copy to myself arrived instantly so I suggest you check your preferences. (If the copy to you "bounced", I would not see the notification of non-delivery.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Please be aware of a particular user who is unilaterally restructuring a lot of categories, including emptying categories out of process and requesting speedy deletion:[1]. Also see [2]. --Orlady (talk) 14:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

• Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Reconsider a speedy deletion?

Hi RHaworth, please see the discussion at User talk:Drmies#University project on evolutionary psychology at (I suspect) Loyola Marymount University and the AfD linked there. Uncle G questions your speedy deletion of Evolutionary psychology of kinship and family. (I've read neither the deleted article nor the parent article, and so have no opinion myself about the deletion.) LadyofShalott 03:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Zac Poonen

Hi. I noticed Zac Poonens page was deleted from Wikipedia, could I have the text for that? Also what was the exact reason for the deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.229.2 (talk) 23:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

IP, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zac Poonen (3rd nomination) for why it was deleted. LadyofShalott 03:54, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Both Zac poonen and Zac Poonen have been salted. However, a very quick Bing search indicates (what looks like) several secondary sources. Could you restore the two articles to User:Launchballer/Zac poonen and User:Launchballer/Zac Poonen?--Launchballer 08:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

• This note is addressed to Launchballer. The IP address who raised the query does not get a reply - read #wikify above and this note. Three AfDs and blatant COI says this subject don't qualify. Selection of states e-mailed. Enjoy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

It's now in a much better state; please move User:Launchballer/Zac Poonen to Zac Poonen.--Launchballer 21:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

• Do the words "links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" suggest anything to you? Submit via AFC and see how far you get. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Submitted here at AfC; by the way, thanks for fixing the error on my user page.--Launchballer 23:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Jonathan Brender‎

Hi. I noticed you attempted to delete Jonathan brender‎ earlier today. It didn't take. I have since tagged the article for its problems. You may want to try again... I'm not clear on the policy in cases where an editor re-creates a page that was deleted. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:57, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

• As in court, in the first instance, assess any repost on its merits without reference to any previous convictions. But if you find it guilty you should mention AfDs, Prods, DRVs, etc. in your deletion proposal. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L II USM

21:28, 19 April 2013 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page File:The Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L II USM.jpg

Hello RH the file Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L II USM.jpg was deleted for copyrights and so on , The jpg file is mine was taken by me using my gear and described with my own words please explain the violations that have been made .. -- Johntorcasio (talk) 11:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

• The image carried a watermarked copyright notice which we do not do. Please upload to the Commons a version without the © text. Also, to be on the safe side, alter the image description of wikia:camerapedia:File:20130326-AJ3P1125-2_(2).jpg to say explicitly that it is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 or a compatible licence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion - Bruce Gerencser

Hello, I'd like to discuss the deletion of the article on Bruce Gerencser. I was in discussion with the person who flagged the article as it got deleted. You can clearly see that I am not Bruce Gerencser and I live on a different continent - I have no association with the guy but I thought he was noteworthy for his work.

There is no COI - I have provided neutral links showing the intentions of both sides (for and against) based on all of the information currently publicly referencible (there are very few Bruce Gerencser critics, but many supporters, I had included the critics). I have also given Bruce a heads up that I was writing a Wikipedia article and therefore had his permission.

With the person who flagged the article, I was discussing what exactly was required and was editing the document based on his input. Not sure why this got deleted so quickly! Why is the description less significant than Ken Ham for instance? Bruce is as experienced but I haven't had enough time to gather all of the information and references and this why I was negotiating more time with the guy who flagged the article. He suggested it should be userficated, and I would have no problem with that.

Thanks and regards, Ken — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kengilmour (talk • contribs) 21:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)21:57, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

• OK you have a different name but I see no evidence for a different continent. But what have I written on your user talk page? Even though I am not willing to userficate it, I will not stop you doing so. But please clothe those horrible naked URLs. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

OK thanks - I will userficate it - how long can I keep this before it gets moderated again? You'll see my IP is from Ireland / Europe - First paragraph in the document describes Bruce as living in Ohio, North America. Will fix the hideous links as you requested :) Thanks! 07:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kengilmour (talk • contribs)

• No, I cannot see your IP address. For some reason that I don't fully appreciate finding the IP address of a logged-in edit is a privilege accorded to a very few people. You may keep it in your user space for as long as you like. If I bother to watch it and it stays in user space for, say, a year then I might delete it as "stale draft". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

moving articles to AFC pages

I think this move is unhelpful; I reviewed the article when I left a note for the author, which you could have told from the edit history. I'm not sure what good making it this AFC page does; it's a fine article, that just needs some formatting. Moving a submitted article back to AFC just seems like it increases the bureaucracy while making things confusing for the authors. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 02:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

p.s. of course I checked it for copyvios when I reviewed it. I think it is just what they say; a school project in process. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 02:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

• The point was that the article was already at AfC and had already been posted in three different places so I wanted to get the message over: post in one place only. Even if you think it is a fine article, I would like an AfC reviewer to look at it first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Dr Witt

You deleted this article. I recognize it as a Polish brand that may be notable. I'd appreciate an undeletion and a proper AFD deletion instead. (sample sources for notability: [3], [4] (this is a mention of the company acquisition if a major Polish media outlet). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

• Unless OliwierB (talk · contribs) is in the pay of the Polish Food Manufacturers Federation (or similar), he probably does not have a COI so I have restored it to User:OliwierB/sandbox. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

iHubbub

Hi there. I just wondered if I could get some feedback to ascertain how comes my post on iHubbub was marked for, and subsequently deleted. This was a reference to a company to explain their presence. not in a promotional capacity, but purely for the same reason any user would look up any other company on Wikipedia. There are several companies similar to this which have Wikiepdia pages, with similar content, so i just wanted to better understand the issues here and would I should look for next time. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themastergooner (talk • contribs) 14:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

• Total absence of evidence of notability. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your website is notable and writes about it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

UN Climate Change Conference

Why have you deleted the page: Talk:2013 United Nations Climate Change Conference? In my opinion every article deserves a talk page. Watti Renew (talk) 15:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

See also 2013 United Nations Climate Change Conference Watti Renew (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

• What was the point of your "see also" link? Check the histories. The article page did not exist when I deleted the talk page! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Moment.me

A copy of moment.me in the article namespace appears to have returned, despite you having moved it into User:Achitov/sandbox. — hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 05:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I know I must be doing this wrong. I am confused and I don't understand what is happening to the moment.me page. Can you help me understand please? Its my first page on wiki and I'm just a bit confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achitov (talk • contribs) 12:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Its me again. I covered all the naked urls and added a category. Can I please post my page now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achitov (talk • contribs) 13:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

• Since you have hidden all the occurrences of http://, I have, reluctantly, posted it for you. I felt your edits were somewhat slovenly - please study these edits and do the same to the other external links. The refs proper you converted to ugly, uninformative [5] type links. Note that of my two changes, {{cite web}} is the preferred style. In the external links section you used <br/> for formatting instead of proper <li>s. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Neis Haus

Hey, I was in the process of creating the article for Neis Haus and well, you guys keep telling me that my article is coming from Soundcloud and that's right, cause my bio is my bio. I dont have another one. Please, give me a full reason why its been nominated and show i can fix this so it doesnt get deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neishaus (talk • contribs) 20:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Then create it. You do not copy biographies from other sources, that's just plagiarism, and you shouldn't be writing about yourself. — Launchballer 21:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

• I was amused at your comment: [this] is the official bio I have composed for myself. It was written by me and this is the bio I use daily. Please remember that this an encyclopedia, not FaceSpace or MyBook. There is no automatic right of inclusion. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks you are notable and writes you up here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

AfC article

Hello there! I'd appreciate it if you shed some light into this discussion. Cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Xmas Bell

Hi, Boyfriend Love Communication 2012 ～Xmas Bell～ was my first article that I created recently but it was in speedy deletion because of lack of improvements. So I decided to create another one again with much more improvement of it. Please check it sir. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonalabrador17 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

The Go Hotels Deletion

Greetings. You deleted the Go Hotels page due to A7. I was re-writing the page earlier to strip out the marketing speak, but now it's deleted because of lack of importance (as I understand it), quite possibly because it was so lean. Is there set of guidelines regarding the importance of the article?

I responded to the person who tagged it for deletion User:Ignatzmice, stating why I felt it was important. Should I have put some other arguments? Please do let me know, and I apologize in advance for the time differentials. — Alex.osias (talk) 12:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

• I do not see your response to Ignatzmice. I am assuming that you have a COI and therefore strongly recommend you to wait until someone with no COI thinks the chain is notable and writes about it here. If you really insist, I suggest you find a "sponsor". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll see what else can be done along those lines. Ignatzmice also contacted me and informed how better to respond to him (and others) in the future. Just curious: why do you moan about "sponsor"? — Alex.osias (talk) 03:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

• Did you not see that the word "sponsor" above is a link? If you actually bother to follow that link, my meaning should be clear to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Following up

Just following up on a comment I made in regards to Zac Poonen. — 209.234.136.36 (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

• What comment? This is the first contribution from this IP address. I suggest you also read the thread at #Zac Poonen above more closely. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

I have restored all but the last three revisions of Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template, since the speedy deletion under G8 was out of process. G8 itself says "This excludes any page that is useful to Wikipedia", the reasoning for which is explained in the {{historical}} template on the page itself. In addition, the page was not deleted in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template, which again makes it ineligible for speedy deletion. Anomie⚔ 21:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Mars Red Sky

Unfortunately I have very little information about Mars Red Sky. However they are an official French Stoner Rock band. They are of significance because they are fairly well-known and I believe they should be included in wikipedia incase people wish to find out about them, as I did. Thank you, Regards FranktheTank (talk) 08:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Mill Hill Missionaries

You deleted Mill Hill Missionaries as a copyright violation. Was there not an earlier version of the article, prior to the addition of the copyrighted material, that could be reverted? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

My apologies for tagging that. I didn't take the time to look at the history first. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 12:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

• Restored to last edit by WikiDan61 - which obviously must be acceptable! I suggest a moan to Vijoyan (talk · contribs) is in order. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

• I don't know if the my last version is acceptable, but it is at least unobjectionable. Clearly the article needs work, but not Vijoyan's brand of work. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

SecureCloud

Hi, you deleted my information page on SecureCloud which was in User:Rory.lean/sandbox, could you kindly explain why? Did you not like the content of the article? I thought it met all your guidelines? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rory.lean (talk • contribs) 16:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

• Spammy and short on links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your "enterprise class mission critical" (whatever that means!) service is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Biocom CRO Initiative

You recently deleted my article, citing it as unambiguous advertising or promotion. I contested the nomination, clarifying that all of the content was pulled (pretty much word-for-word) from reliable sources and described the organization from a neutral point of view. Can you please explain why the article was deleted? Hlmcmahon (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)hlmcmahon

• "Pretty much word-for-word" - that would make it a copyvio as well. We were not impressed with the evidence of notability offered. If you really think it deserves a place here, re-submit via AfC - witha title of Biocom CRO Initiative. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of OfficeYes.com

Dear RH, You speedily deleted OfficeYes.com citing no indication of importance and unambiguous advertising or promotion. — Coopeteer (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Extended content
{{{1}}}

• Your next step is to raise the matter at deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Appreciate the guidance, I will do so. Best regards. Coopeteer (talk) 10:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Troll Bends Fir band's page

A couple of years ago Troll Bends Fir page was deleted for A7 reason. It was a famous band in Russia then and has gained more popularity outside Russia as well (5 LPs released,over 70000 fans on Myspace, around 4000 on Twitter, about 80 gigs per a year). I think these figures prove the band deserves to be mentioned on Wikipedia.

Troll Bends Fir's gigs | MySpace | Twitter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moreisha77 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

• If you think they have become notable in the last two years, submit a new article making sure to add evidence of notability. MySpace and Twitter links may be included in the article but they do not constitute such evidence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Ezzelino II da Romano

I don't understand your observation what is the reason of a redirect to a disambig that link to that page? Infinite circle? Stigni (talk) 11:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

• If you had actually bothered to fix the five links from the (article) namespace, I would probably have deleted it without hesitation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes but those article are already disambig... They refer to Ezzelino II da Romano but with the redirect from that page to Ezzelini is a nonsense. For me is much better a redlink. I propose that page for RfD. Stigni (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

• Apologies - your English confused me. If you had said explicitly "is better as a red link", I would probably have deleted it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Kicked in the Head

Hi, I saw you A7'ed this page after it was nominated by User:Hoponpop69. I did not get a chance to look at this article immediately before deletion, but Hoponpop69 has attempted to speedy that page at least once before and possibly multiple times (he does this frequently for band pages he doesn't like; see also the history of The Everyday Visuals, which he nominated again and again until he found a time when I wasn't on to stop him). I contested a speedy on Kicked in the Head before because the article made plausible assertions to notability; the band has an Allmusic biography which substantiates some of what I remember being on this page. The article may not survive an AfD, but I think it's got enough to pass A7 such that a wider community consensus ought to be sought before deletion. Could you please take a second look? Chubbles (talk) 20:59, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

• I hate to have restore an article completely devoid of external links but your arguments are sound. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

DL Teamor

Why are you want to delete DL Teamor? She is a published author and she hosts TV shows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvs530 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• Now deleted at the request of a very disgruntled creator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Deleting Al Hoty Stanger topic

Dear Sir, I posted a topic about my company here in Wikipedia Al Hoty Stanger but then it was deleted by you and I don't understand why.. Please clarify, Sorry to disturb you. Thanks & Regards, Hatem M. Moukhtar IT Dept. Al Hoty Stanger Co Ltd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hatemtoma1986 (talk • contribs) 06:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Hatem! The reason given for deletion was "Unambiguous copyright infringement"; did you see that? Perhaps you forgot to read WP:COPYPASTE before copying and pasting onto Wikipedia? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 06:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• Please read this then go away and wait for someone with no COI to write about your company. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Deleting Images

1.) i dont get why you deleted the free content image, i thought its allowed to upload Public Domain images, didnt know they can be deleted at will. 2.) fair enough, you have your reason, although they didnt justify the deletion. But just to let you know. im creating Own Work based on this map and will of course link the content (as required) to the author its based on. Any problems with that? because acc. to Wikipedia im allowed to do that. Daufer (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• So I am expected to guess which image you are talking about? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
  • LOL, thats just great, you dont even know what image you deleted! i suppose that this also means you havent checked the talk-page were i clearly stated that the proposal for speedy deletion made by user Eeckster is false since the image is public domain / author clearly writes its FREE and permission is granted via a Share button.Daufer (talk) 23:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
    • LOL nice picture; you dusted your face off the pavement LOL; is there a vid on YouTube? must have looked as fun as on your picture.Daufer (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

While reviewing my CSD log, I came across your deletions for those CSD tags . Thank you for boosting my motives. :) Ghorpaapi (talk) 14:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Asia Minor

Could you move the history of User:Launchballer/Asia Minor directly over the top of Asia Minor? Thank you.--Launchballer 15:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

• Unbelievable! The term Asia Minor has applied to Anatolia for literally thousands of years but you think that some recent song is worthy to sit on that title. You may move User:Launchballer/Asia Minor to Asia Minor (song). The song is not even important enough to justify converting Asia Minor into a disambiguation page but you may place {{for|the song Asia Minor by Jimmy Wisner|Asia Minor (song)}} as the second line of the Anatolia article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking about doing this for y'all, and noticed that there is also a Asia Minor (album) article (unrelated to the song), which certainly complicates the disambiguation situation. The album article is currently impossible to find with the normal search. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 20:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

• The song and album articles are both of minor importance (pun intended!) but since there are two of them, perhaps that is justification for changing Asia Minor into a dab page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Good idea. I'll go work on that. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 20:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't call recent 50 years old, but I've moved the song to Asia Minor (song). As for the disambiguation page, there's a bit more than that there.

• Asia Minor
• Asia Minor (album)
• Asia Minor (disambiguation)
• Asia Minor (instrumental)
• Asia Minor (song)
• Asia Minor Campaign
• Asia Minor Catastrophe
• Asia Minor Celts
• Asia Minor Defense Organization
• Asia Minor Disaster
• Asia Minor Greek
• Asia Minor Greeks
• Asia Minor Ground Squirrel
• Asia Minor Slavs
• Asia Minor Spiny Mouse
• Asia Minor disaster
• Asia Minor ground squirrel
• Asia Minor refugees
• Asia Minor spiny mouse
• Asia Minor thin-toed gecko

Four articles, excluding redirects.--Launchballer 20:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Wow, nice template. I've got more work to do, then. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 20:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Well it's not new, that's for sure. I have added the remaining two entries.--Launchballer 21:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Much nicer. Thanks. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 21:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

• 50 years is very recent compared to the original usage of Asia Minor. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Just as a heads up, User:R'n'B has reverted the edits; I have tried to reason with him, with little success.--Launchballer 14:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me? What edits did I revert? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

The movement of Asia Minor to Asia Minor (disambiguation).--Launchballer 19:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I like to be precise. Uncle Milty edited a page that was formerly a redirect and made it into a disambiguation page. I didn't revert that edit, or yours; I just changed the title of the disambiguation page.

As for your trying to reason with me, I'll let your post on my talk page speak for itself.

Anyway, I tried to reason with you -- I explained that my move was based on the primary topic guideline. I haven't seen you respond to that at all, nor was it discussed above in this section. And I'll be really surprised if anyone seriously disputes the fact that readers searching for the term "Asia Minor" are much more likely to be looking for the geographical area than for a song or album title. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete User:Daredevil7, please

Can you please delete User:Daredevil7, because the user has reverted to vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.177.130 (talk) 04:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

-- 223.92.200.86 (talk) 05:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Magazines

Hallo, I see you deleted Business Magazine under A7, but I don't see that a magazine fits the criteria. I'd unspeedied it and PRODded, but we must have had an edit conflict. PamD 09:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

• I call your attitude pedantry but if you want due process to be slavishly applied, you may have it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks. I call it sticking to the rules - if you want A7 expanded to include publications, then propose a change to the criteria. PamD 09:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Deleted page Kill Paris

Hi, I'm inquiring about the deletion of the page Kill Paris. It appears there were some copyright issues before, and I'd like to write a new page. Ref: 10:32, 29 January 2013 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Kill Paris (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of this page) Thanks, ShiftyMitch (talk) 20:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Then write the new page, but if it's another copyright violation, it'll be deleted again. It might be worth writing it at User:ShiftyMitch/Kill Paris first.--Launchballer 21:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

• It would be better for you to wait until someone with no COI thinks the guy is notable and creates an article containing some evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Flag of Bushmanland

Why did you delete Flag of Bushmanland? It didn't duplicate Bushmanland (South-West Africa), that's like saying Flag of the United States duplicates United States. — Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 09:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

It was redundant - all the content is available on that page.--Launchballer 09:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Aside from having a image of the flag (like almost every other country/territory article), the Bushmanland (South-West Africa) article has no content about the flag. — Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 09:09, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

So fix it. The flag does not deserve an article of its own; you may add the content of the flag's article to the country's article.--Launchballer 09:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

• As the man says, what is stopping you writing about the flag within the Bushmanland article? Please reply. As you can see a large proportion of the Flag of … tiltes are redirects. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

iON Manufacturing page

Hi Roger,

Thank you for taking the time to carefully review the content of "iON Manufacturing Solution WIKI PAGE". I understand your concern on the advertorial language and would like to meet all the wiki guidelines.

We put our best foot forward to give a neutral picture of the Cloud service offering provided by iON for the SMB verticals. As best practice, have also reviewed wiki pages of SAP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAP_ERP ).

Kindly put the page back online (un-delete) and mark the sections you feel should be re-written and our content writer will follow the prescribed guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.249.151 (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)