User talk:RHaworth/2015 Mar 30

Ten Years

On 2015 Jan 1, I joined the Wikipedia Ten Year Society.
Will I make it for another ten?

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

The Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Deletion

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Deletion of Delta Airlines Flight 1086

You deleted this article with reason A7. I fail to understand how this criterion applied. I recognize that there is room for debate about the notability of the incident, but it seems to me that you have significantly misused the speedy deletion criterion: Nominally, the article is about a particular scheduled commercial airline flight, making it an "organized event"; however, the fact that the airplane operating the flight crashed on landing, clearly described in the article, is a more-than-sufficient "claim of notability" to exempt it from speedy deletion under this criterion. — CarLuva (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

• Perhaps a bit harsh to delete a newbie's first effort so restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

I made some major improvements to this article, and I do believe the subject accident definitely meets the standard for notability. Since you were the original AfD proposer, I'd appreciate if you could take a look at the article now and perhaps reconsider your position on nominating it for AfD. — Darkest Tree Talk 01:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• It is always a bit depressing when you start an AfD discussion and nobody joins in. In this case the opposite has happened so my withdrawing the nomination would make little difference. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion Help

Hi, I had noticed that some time ago you had deleted a page I'd put up ' Russ Appleby'. I wondered if there was any tips you could give me to rewrite it which would make it more Wiki friendly if possible. Maybe including some tv work, international work or more photos or links to other articles relating to things. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Russpie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russpie (talk • contribs) 12:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

• At least you have not been forcing yourself urgently upon Wikipedia but even so, you should wait until someone with no COI thinks you are notable and writes about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

we can do business

You delete a lot. If you and I find articles that should be deleted, we should do it. As far as personal pages being deleted, that could make people mad unnecessarily. — Wowee Zowee public (talk) 15:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

I second this sentiment. Mine is a page you deleted. DCdanielcaldwell 00:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alwaysremember (talk • contribs)

Congratulations on 20 years in Wikipedia

Congratulations! — Wowee Zowee public (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

It will come to pass. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wowee Zowee public (talk • contribs) 15:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Gray Matters Capital Foundation

I work for Gray Matters Capital Foundation and this page was wrongly deleted. We are a non-profit, so we were not advertising. We own the website, so there is no copyright infringement. Please advise the steps that need to be taken to activate this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jen404 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

• Profit or non-profit are treated exactly the same in Wikipedia. You do not need to take any steps. When your organisation becomes notable someone with no COI will write about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Ceschi

Why did you delete the Ceschi page? He has plenty of coverage: Village Voice, AllMusic, Exclaim, Boston Phoenix, etc. Pretty sure these were referenced in the article too. -- Forty.4 (talk) 17:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Forty.4, have you even bothered to read the info presented on Ceschi? Hint: it's impossible to miss and even in RED. I'm smelling a WP:COI, to be honest. — The Dissident Aggressor 00:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Where? Here? Or here? Where is it? You are not linking me to it. Where is the discussion around Ceschi's notability in the year 2015? All I see is a discussion that took place eight years ago. He has become a good deal more notable since then, releasing his most widely reviewed album and founding Fake Four. Non-notability is not a permanent affliction. And you have absolutely no basis for suspecting a COI, get a hold of yourself. -- Forty.4 (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• The latest version had been around for two and a half years but was still short on evidence of notability. If you can create a decently referenced version, feel free to raise the matter at deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Weren't the above sources referenced in the article? -- Forty.4 (talk) 01:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• The allmusic link was there but none of the others. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Okay. One of his albums (the one released after the 2007 AfD) has its own article, which was certainly linked from the Ceschi article, and the sources were all there (bar the Village Voice one, plus the Tiny Mix Tapes one). I think there was enough evidence of notability here for you to have not salted the page based on an AfD from eight years ago. - Forty.4 (talk) 01:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Sarah Gertrude Shapiro

hi. I am new to wikipedia. I love this site and tried very hard to make sure my first article was factually correct, well sourced, and on a topic that has not been previously covered. I chose Sarah Gertrude Shapiro. She is a television show creator, musician and director of note who is referenced on several pages but does not have her own page, so it seemed appropriate to create. I had gathered 15 references and was careful to be accurate, but for some reason you deleted it. My formatting was still in progress as this is a little confusing at first. If you could please explain what was wrong with my article I will gladly fix the issues so that I can learn how to be a helpful to wikipedia, which has helped me so much. Thank you, Dinosuarus (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• Go back to the place which told you that I had done the deletion and read more carefully what you see there. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Deep Kapuria

Hello. We had previously created a page for a CEO with whom we are working. The page was supposedly deleted owing to G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement. But we believe we gave necessary sources to support our content, especially the link mentioned. We wish to create a new page for the same person, and have rewritten the content. Frankly, we are a bit lost on where we are infringing. Request you to please help us on how to avoid the mistakes in particular if any. — 103.227.69.154 (talk) 13:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

<Message repeated word for word but now signed:> Sa8790 (talk) 16:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• Your second message is, in some ways worse than your first since it is the first edit for that account. Please log in with one of the two user accounts that have edited the page and explain exactly what the relationship is between those two accounts and also explain who the "we" are in whose name you are writing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Zzz

ZzzQuil is an existing trade name for diphenhydramine. I see no reason to delete the former as a redirect to the latter. Kindly restore it. — DS (talk) 14:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• Please learn to provide links when you write about articles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Okay. Thank you. DS (talk) 14:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

File:GerardLopez.png

Why was this picture deleted for being a copy violation? I credited the website that gave the photo from. They released the photo for free on one of their web pages. Anyone can view the webpage. I even have the website that the image came from: [1] Please take this into consideration. — FordDixon (talk) 14:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• The person who applied the speedy deletion tag did so with this edit summary: "nothing from the source states this image is available under Creative Commons". End of story. And why did you scale it down? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

I scaled it down because it was simply too big. I didn't want the image to be so big on the article, as the dimensions are 1600x900, which is much too big to be usable. Do you know who tagged the image for deletion? I'd like to have a word with them. — FordDixon (talk) 14:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• Policy is to upload images at the highest resolution available. The wiki software does a brilliant job of scaling them to any size for use in articles. The speedy tag was applied by The359 (talk · contribs) but I am sure they will simply repeat their view. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Rfd: Eginyn

Re: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 March 5#Eginyn: I think that you interpreted a comment from the nominator incorrectly in this discussion. You closed this as "delete per nominator" but another editor struck a comment by Some Gadget Geek which seems to have made it appear that they favoured deletion when they do not. I am in favour of deletion myself and the discussion was clearly going that way, but since the nominator seems to still be looking for a way to keep the redirect I think it will save future headache if the deletion is for a policy- or consensus-supported reason rather than "per nominator". Thanks. Ivanvector (talk) 17:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• I don't know what you think the nominator said but I read "inter-language soft redirects are not generally considered useful" which, I hope you will agree is well-established policy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

My goodness, I seem to have confused nominator with creator. Apologies, of course you're right, and thanks for taking a look anyway. I shall consume greater quantities of caffeine before reviewing long deletion threads again. — Ivanvector (talk) 14:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Article

Fair use, in my draft of the Stentorians, which you deleted, I made reference to materials which you cited as infringing on copyright. However, on that site, it clearly states that the material is sourced elsewhere and "You are free to use this material in any constructive way. There should be no charge for the use of this material or any profit made from the use of it. For the most part it was freely given and should be passed along the same way. If you have material to add, or changes that should be made, please contact me."

The sections you deleted the draft for sets the foundation, the history, that presaged the creation of this fraternal organization. without it, the story lacks background, and as historical material, cannot be refuted as heresay. My sources were Lafire, aaffmuseum timeline and the paper researched by Joe Shalmoni. In creating the draft I find that I cannot make the references link correctly and while the citations were listed but not referenced, they were there for perusal.

While Changes were being made, you did not join the discussion, but rather deleted the entry. Can you please explain how you came to this decision on a draft in progress? — CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• A copyvio is a copyvio in whatever namespace it is posted. Please also read this. Yours is a classic case of dumping text from elsewhere rather than writing a Wikipedia article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for correcting the error I made when trying to archive my talk page. I appreciate it! Safehaven86 (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quick follow up on that--I now have 3 archive pages, but only two are showing up on my main talk page. Do you happen to know how I can fix that? Sorry to bug you, and thanks. Safehaven86 (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• By all means do your archiving by hand - I do the same because I like to be different and use a technique not supported by any bot. But be aware that lowercase sigmabot III (talk · contribs) is eager to do automatic archiving for you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion

Hi RHarworth, you've deleted a couple of things for me in the past and now that this article's 7-day period for deletion has ran out could you do this one too? Thanks a bunch, SamWilson989 (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! SamWilson989 (talk) 21:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hi, you speedied قرية بلمونت، فيلادلفيا db-a10 (at my request), an Arabic translation of an existing English article accidentally created on English WP by a new editor. She's asked for help at my talk page. Can you please undelete it to User:Sarah Alhijris/قرية بلمونت، فيلادلفيا, and I'll then help her copy and paste that draft to Arabic Wikipedia. Thanks, Dai Pritchard (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Eugene Issac

while creating page is shownd that this page had been deleted.(A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject) i want to re create the page by giving information plz assist me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eugene issac (talk • contribs) 09:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not a social networking site. When you become notable, someone with no COI will write about you here. No action by you is needed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the behind the scenes work you do

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Just wanted to drop you a quick note and some recognition for all the drudge work you do behind the scenes helping to make this site better. Onel5969 (talk) 13:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC) Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

AfD cleanup

Hi. You recently deleted Kingdom Hall (disambiguation). Can you also close (or just delete) the AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Hall (disambiguation)? I raised the AfD before considering that the page could just be speedy-deleted. Thanks. -- Jeffro77 (talk) 13:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

• Closing an AfD discussion does not require admin rights so you clean up after yourself. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

I wasn't sure if I should. WP:NACD says "In general, administrators are responsible for closing deletion discussions." I've never closed an AfD before, so if I've done it incorrectly... oh well.--Jeffro77 (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Washington High School

The page titled Washington High School (East Chicago, Indiana) is not a hoax. The high school merged with E.C. Roosevelt to become E. C. Central in 1987. What would lead you to believe that it was a so-called 'blatant hoax' ??? My friends and I attended that school, as did ....

• Vince Boryla
• Tim Stoddard
• Junior Bridgeman
• Kenny Lofton

...and thousands of others that do not (yet) have a Wiki article about them. Please un-delete it. Sincerely, Jess (talk) 14:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC) ECW Class of 1980

• You could have added Ray Ragelis and Pete Trgovich to your list. So if it merged in 1987, why is its soccer team still playing as Washington in 2013? The words "East Chicago Cardinals" are visible in massive letters in Google's satellite view of their gridiron. To further the confusion, the E. C. Central article calls the previous schools Roosevelt Rough Riders and Washington Senators - though that is probably confusing the names of their sports teams with the official school names. I have been criticised before for giving wrong deletion reasons. In this case the real reason was: hopelessly stubby. Restored to User:Jguad1/sandbox. Probably worthy of its own article rather than creating as a redirect to the E. C. Central article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

BGMEA

You have deleted a Wiki page titled BGMEA. The page contains an important organization which is a trade body that is related to the ready made garment industry of Bangladesh which is the second largest apparel exporting country in the world. Besides, the article contains no promotional stuff; rather it has some important information for those who are interested in the garment industry of Bangladesh and BGMEA. BGMEA is the member of the International Apparel Federation (IAF). I hope you understand the importance. So please restore the article. — Nirnasim (talk) 06:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

• I hope you understand the importance that: a) Wikipedia articles should be written by people with no COI and b) must provide evidence of notability. The best I can offer is that you should follow this advice and find an established Wikipedian willing to write about your organisation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Dear RHaworth, thanks for your advice. However, you did not mention what is wrong (please suggest if any) with my writing the article on BGMEA. If my first article is accepted and published in Wikipedia, then I will be encouraged to contribute more to Wikipedia. I hope you would consider. — Nirnasim (talk) 05:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

• I have already told you that Wikipedia articles must provide evidence of notability and yours did not. "Let me have this one and I will become a good contributor" - I've never heard that argument before. But it cuts no ice with me - I just turn it on its head and say: establish a good record of edits with no hint of COI and about notable subjects - then I may consider approving your creation of BGMEA. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Dear RHaworth, my article on BGMEA has both primary and secondary sources which are also reliable. Therefore, my article meets criteria of notability and so deserves to be restored. — Nirnasim (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Your article contained just one link - to your website. How long is it going to be before you realise that you are banging your head against a brick wall with me? You could make a request at deletion review but at the end of the day the result will be the same. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Deleting HJMS

The article deleted was a request from the author himself of the website in the "copyright infringment" he himself preferred to have the same text in some paragraphs and I commented that "the ok was given unofficially and I will personally contact him for official approval" have him send a permission granting email (OTRS). What is frustrating are the hours of work with the formatting and markup going back and forth to the author himself for approval just to scrap all of it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanoog (talk • contribs) 14:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

• I deleted HJMS for lack of notability, though now you point it out there was copyvio also. But what a terrible admission of COI - the whole point of a Wikipedia article is that we do not need any approval from the subject of the article. Real editors take a pride in their independence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of PileInspect

The article is proposed to be deleted due to 'no evidence of notability'. To provide the evidence of notability, I added two sources relating to this article:

• "Description of Work of the PileInspect project - Integrity Testing of Deep Foundation Piles", Grant agreement no: 605676, FP7-SME-2013
• "Ensayos de integridad de pilotes en cimentaciones profundas (PILEINSPECT)", 13th National Conference on NDT (Spain) , Sevilla, 6-8 May 2015

The PileInspect system is now being developed and cited in publications from journals and conference proceedings in the field of Nondestructive technologies (NDT). One paper (full manuscript) was accepted last week and to be presented in 13th National Conference on NDT (Spain) which will take place in Sevilla in 6th to 8th May 2015. The paper is in Spanish: Ensayos de integridad de pilotes en cimentaciones profundas (PILEINSPECT). I added this reference in the page to be used as proof of notability. The other publications are in submission and review. The abstracts of two papers as below have been accepted and to be presented in NDT-CE 2015 (Sept 15-17, http://www.ndt-ce2015.net/) -in Berlin, Germany :

• “Old ideas to improve pile integrity testing revisited and optimized“
• “Defect Detection in Concrete Pile Using Impulse Response Measurements with Sine Sweep Excitations”

I will keep this page updated on any progress of the development of PileInspect system and publications relating to this topic. Please can you advise on what I can further provide and modify to improve the article? Thank you! Zhenghaitao (talk) 16:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Ivo G. Gut

Dear Mr Haworth, My article Draft: Ivo G. Gut, has been deleted by you due to Copyright Conflict but there was no conflict there. Can you please let me know what is wrong with it. Thank you, anna — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna bpages (talk • contribs) 16:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

• The amount of wording copied was probably enough to qualify for deletion as copyvio but, more importantly, there was a total lack of evidence of notability. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks the guy is notable and writes about him here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Was Maleficent simply missed?

You got the talk page deleted but missed the main page. Just an oops? Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

• Definitely a temporary brianstorm: I have firm policy on db-move requests: if I agree the move, then I will do it so that the requested deletion is just a side-effect of the move. Otherwise I leave the page alone. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Copy of deleted Talk:MVP Software

Would you please 'copy the (brief) contents of a talk page you deleted: 10:38, 10 March 2015, Talk:MVP Software, to my talk section, User talk:i10neorg#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_MVP_Software? I had collected some information there that may be useful in the future. Thank you! --I10neorg (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

• Replied on I10neorg's page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Scarlet Monahan

Hello, I would like to create an article and add an photographic/digital artist, sculptress and poet to wiki, I believe she is highly influential and important as a modern artist. she has been involved with satirizing British politics and ridiculing the gov. I will build it and gather as much info as possible but noticed you deleted a page before have you seen her on twitter @scarletmonahan just thought id contact you before starting Scarlet Monahan. Could you suggest a catagory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconicartlover (talk • contribs) 00:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

• Please learn wikilinks before you start anything. Please explain your relationship to Phizee (talk · contribs). Twitter is for bird brains - you will need real references if you want an article to stick. You almost certainly have a COI and should not be writing on this subject but if you insist on trying, then the word if category and you could try people from Hertfordshire, female artists and British photographers for starters. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Agni8

Hi RHaworth!

I want to let you know that the above user had pasted the content of the article, Luxury shopping behaviour of Chinese consumers you recently deleted on their user page. Cheers! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

You are a scary creature

	Real Scary Creature
	Honor to you because you deletes articles in a minute on which people spent a lot of time. Tomaswings (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

• I do sometimes feel just a teeny teeny bit of guilt about deleting what in some, but by no means all, cases is a lot of work - see for example Deleting HJMS above. But authors are always free to post their text elsewhere on the web and I am always willing to supply copies if needed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

C824767

Hi RHa ! I noticed you deleted C824767. I was just going to delete it myself but saw no provision for that. Maybe because it was already done or because the originator of the article cannot do that ? I like that you guys read new articles and delete them if need be. If I ever need to delete one again and cannot get it done I will ask you ! Patent nonsense is a fun way to put it ! I will tell this genius mathematician who told me last year that this number is the weirdest one he has ever seen. — C824767 (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

• Please do not make an habit of posting pages and then thinking better of it but if you do it, don't ask me to delete - slap a {{db-author}} tag on the page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

HiHi habit. Do not worry. I have nothing habit forming in my psychological make up. Definitely not something as regulated as Wikipedia article writing. I am awfully sorry that it is all such a bother to you. I gave you a barn star did I not ? I thought you liked deleting articles ? Or is it more fun when the author does NOT WANT it deleted ? I put in a new userspace draft. If you get a chance, look and delete if you do not like it ! Thanks, C. Randolph, C824767 (talk) 16:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• I shall probably be blocking Adeptzare3 (talk · contribs) soon because there is very little evidence that they are here to help build an encyclopedia. You are in danger of going the same way since, so far, you have made zero useful edits. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Eliacom ESP page

Hi RHaworth, I am a little confused as to why you deleted the page Eliacom ESP (Enhanced SQL Portal) for advertising while I was discussing the issue with Trivialist. There was no advertising or effusive language on the page. It was purely informative. If you compare the page to phpMyAdmin, or heidiSQL (which are exactly the same type of topic) there is absolutely no difference. In fact, when fashioning the page, I used those as templates to guide me, as those are clearly acceptable. Therefore, it doesn't deserve deletion by merit of Unambiguous advertising or promotion, or else those pages should be deleted as well. If you can show me a difference between those pages and the ESP page, I will gladly remedy it.

If the argument is about notoriety, then that is a more complicated discussion. I was in the process of discussing this with Trivialist, when you deleted the page. I think that's somewhat bad form. Best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pflammer (talk • contribs) 15:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

• Why on earth did you apply an {{hangon}} tag when CambridgeBayWeather (talk · contribs) had kindly removed the speedy tag? Adding the hangon put the article back into CAT:CSD. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Midwest Art Conservation Center

Hi, recently the submission for the Midwest Art Conservation Center was deleted. We received notification that the entry read too much like an advert. We're wondering if it can be restored so we can continue to work on it? Thank you! Macc1297 (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

• No, there has never been a page called Midwest Art Conservation Center‎. (Hint: learn to read your contributions history.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Martha Brockenbrough deleted

Hi, Can you send me the text of the deleted file so I can re-create or edit it to conform? — JameswoodSK (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)James

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

John W. Teets

18:23, 19 February 2015 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:John W. Teets (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://johnwteets.com/biography/). The copyright owner of the source page added the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) to the page. I would like to recreate a page similar to the previously deleted page but am contacting you first, as requested in the notice of deletion. May I proceed? — Ericcosh (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

• I often recommend people to do that but it rarely happens. However the page still has "© 2013 J.W. Teets Enterprises, LLC, All Rights Reserved" at the bottom. More importantly, what is the point of doing it - the style is far too self-congratulatory. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks the guy is notable and writes a Wikipedia article about him. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Boston renegades'

Deleted page Boston renegades. Dear Mr. RHaworth, I am a first time contributor and appreciate for the heads up. I have revised my original article about Boston renagades adding secondary resource and would be happy if I could retry uploading the article. There is another sports team with the same name so I would also like to add an disambiguation page. I am sorry to trouble you but if you will give me an further advice for this article to be notable. Thank you very much in advance. Sincerely yours, Uiaa0222 (talk) 03:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

• Amateur sports clubs do not usually qualify and the number of links in this list confirms that for the NBBA. I recommend you to create a separate wiki for the clubs hosted either on the NBBA website or at Wikia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

I apologize for the late reply but thank you very much for your suggestion, sir. There are several sports team with the same name in my city and wished to create pages to distinguish each. I will read the instructions and will try creating on Wikia first. Again, I appreciate your constructive feedback. Sincerely yours, Uiaa0222 (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Adeptzare3 (4,6,7)

Please delete User:Adeptzare3/4, User:Adeptzare3/6, and User:Adeptzare3/7. User talk:Adeptzare3/Hectane/Templates/Signature 04:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

• There was no need to ask me - you had already applied a speedy tag to each page. In fact {{db-user}} was the preferred tag. Please apply more time to making useful contributions rather than fiddling with your user pages. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Zoo Holdings

Hi, You delete an article named Zoo Holdings Group on March 20, and would you please point our for me where the problem is? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninachan0728 (talk • contribs) 06:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who: a) does not shout, b) has no COI and c) knows the difference between Wikipedia style and advertising copy thinks your group is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Croydon Love

	Best Patroll - er ever
	Thank You FellowFromCroydon. I lived in Thornton Heath for a year....taught German at Ashburton High. No one wanted to learn it. Oh no Miss. We will never go to Germany anyway Miss. — C824767 (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Jalsonic Secure

Hello, Why you deleted Jalsonic page on Wiki, jalsonic secure is secure web login system, to save ATMs card or other thing. plz you visit the website http://www.jalsonic.com/secure. thnaks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.59.99.97 (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

AN discussion

Hi, Another editor has started a discussion concerning one of your speedy deletions at WP:AN#Deleting pages without discussion. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Host for hustings

Mr. Haworth, you deleted my page too, DCDanielCaldwell, and I am not sure whether my prompt response to it being tagged for speedy deletion was even read. I tried just using the content from http://ballotpedia.org/Daniel_Caldwell,_I which I did not put there, I cited my sources, and I do not know what else you would have needed me to do. Political officeholder challengers are rarely granted the same allowances as incumbents to get their name out there. Voting for the election starts April 27th and ends May 9th. You know the rules ALWAYS favor the establishment. Will you let me have at least a halfway fair shot? DCdanielcaldwell 17:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alwaysremember (talk • contribs)

• Quite simply, Wikipedia is not an host for hustings. Kindly have the decency to wait until you become notable - which probably requires a lot more than simply serving on a city council - and someone with no CO decides to write about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

in the middle of building wiki pedia

Good day sir, I was in the middle of setting up the page when it was deleted. NCITG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmalvarez (talk • contribs) 19:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Page immediately deleted

I am trying, with the help of someone, to create a page for a company called Critical Systems Inc. I understand most company pages are deleted immediately but I would like to offer that this company is at the forefront of their technology and has been since 1998. They work with other noted companies in the semi-conductor industry. I tried to write the article without sounding promotional and only detailing how they fit into the industry. I used the following page of a company that they deal with in the same industry as a guideline: Air Products & Chemicals. They are currently in the process of writing a number of new articles concerning gas abatement technologies, which is very lacking on Wikipedia right now. They have added 2 new pages recently that have been accepted on Wikipedia, to fill holes in the technology. They are linked from those pages as well as at least one other. Could you please advise as to how i could get this important company's information listed on Wikipedia. And i apologize if i missed following protocol as this is all very strange to me. The page was at Critical Systems. Thanks you, Tyankee (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)tyankee

• "They" have created Draft:Critical Systems Inc. so you don't need to do anything. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

A page you deleted has been recreated

On March 21st you deleted User:Bolero24/sandbox for misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost, today my bot detected that it was recreated. I looked at the article and it looks like it might be the a recreation of the deleted article, however, as a non-administrator I cannot see the deleted page so am notifying you. I have not marked it for deletion because it could just be an article under construction that doesn't yet indicate notability. PhantomTech (talk) 00:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Talk about can of worms! Bolero24 (talk · contribs) appears to be one of an whole clutch of socks who each create one sandbox article. There seems to be a bit of good faith about this so what I propose should be done is move each sandbox to draft: space and submit it. If you wanted to help … — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

I moved and submitted the one I linked to, don't know what usernames the others are under so I can't really help with those. PhantomTech (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• @PhantomTech: very strange: you say "don't know what usernames the others are under" but somehow, using exactly the same information as is available to you, I find 22 names. It was the spooky similarity of the edit patterns that led me to think at first that it was sock puppetry. I can almost visualise them sitting there and the lecturer saying: "I want each of you to leave a message on the talk page of each of the people near to you - and laying it down in such detail as to say "put <p> on a line by itself before your signature". It was of course this walled garden of user talk messages that enabled me to identify the people. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I assumed you knew there were multiple uses because of something related to the deletion, I didn't even bother to check the talk page. I noticed you went through the trouble of pointing them to this message on their talk pages, would you still like me to move their sandboxes to AfC and submit them or would you prefer I just watch them for a bit? — PhantomTech (talk) 04:38, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

• Now that I have worked out what is going on, I will reverse my view: the sandbox pages must be left where they are - publishing them is an integral part of any student project and if they don't do it, they must suffer the consequences. (But now you have moved Bolero24's page it can stay where it is.) There is so far a resounding silence in response to my messages. Keep watching. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Querry on a Page

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph Ziba. Sir, I created this page for my Pastor, but it has not been published and i guess it is because I did not meet some conditions. I ask you if there is any help you can do that this page can be published. Allastone (talk) 07:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Allastone Allastone (talk) 07:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Since you wrote the above you have discovered AfC tags. I have moved your page to draft:Joseph Ziba because we do not put honorifics in bio titles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Wish to create the page again. Please help

Hey!!! Niki here, This is about the article which you have deleted Draft:Neeraj Mehta. My write up was declined twice due to lack of citation. I got to know how to enter correct citation and I have good sources as well, However, I could not work on the write up as I was stuck up with deadlines. I want to create the page again and as per the notification I would need to discuss it with you first. I really require your advise and help on this. I have got good sources and the person I want to write about have good reputation and invented various exercise techniques. Really need your help. Please advise. — Niki518 (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for admitting sock puppetry. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

GODAN website

Hi, I work for GODAN - I used our website copy for the page. I asked for copyright details to be sent to your permissions team today, to give Wikipedia permission to use our copy. I noticed that that you flagged the copy as needing work- I will update it. Is there a copy of the deleted page anywhere? I spent quite a while formatting it and didn't expect it to be deleted so quickly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klara cabi (talk • contribs) 13:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Please read this for my views on people who copy their own website and think they have created a Wikipedia article. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who a) had no COI and b) is willing to write an article from scratch thinks your company is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

ANONYMOUS6382723/sandbox

It has come to my attention my page has been deleted for a copyright infringement however I wan not sure what copyright law(s) I broke. This is the page at User:ANONYMOUS6382723/sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.81.231 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

MyTaxPrepOffice

Hi RHaworth, This is Sabina Hary. I created a page MyTaxPrepOffice. I have a message of (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). My intent is not to advertising or promotion, I just like MyTaxPrepOffice Professional Tax Software, as a reason of that I have added it into your database and create a page with name "MyTaxPrepOffice" Please revert page, and publish it. I appreciate you. Regards, Sabina Hary — Preceding unsigned comment added by SabinaHary (talk • contribs) 14:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

• You could go to deletion review where other people will tell you that it was spam. Or you could give up now. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/653514825

I wish there was a quick way to say "understood". For my own interest, may I ask where the SPI is? -- L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 21:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

• Please do not assume that every Wikipedian thinks in acronyms. By SPI do you possibly mean SPI? What makes you think that 86.41.246.249 (talk) has been the subject of a formal SPI? If you try Special:WhatLinksHere/User_talk:86.41.246.249 you may get a clue to the background. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Your recent edits against my userpage spaces are WP:VANDALISM and thus this is a warning that further vandalism will result in a block from editing. My userpages shall be restored, and any supposed copyright infringement will be removed thereof. — RoyalMate1 21:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Request to undelete my User page

Hi User:RHaworth - A few minutes ago you choose to delete my user page User:Drawab - citing (U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host) - this page has been on wikipedia for quite sometime - it was more like a personal sandbox page - which I have been tweaking for quite many years, it may seem to have been a reaction to two pages I created Khurrum Sher Zaman and Samar Ali Khan - the moment I created those pages, they were marked for speedy deletion - I had no idea that Wikipedia was so stringent on such, I was trying to re-edit and may very well admit that it did not meet the criteria and ACCEPT the deletion of those two pages - which you personally deleted - unless I come up with a better text I admit it should remain deleted - but please kindly spare my user page - it is a work in progress, and if you see blatant marketing - allow me to fix it - i have no archive of the work that was done, it was all customized and it was not a main wiki page but only a USER page - would be grateful if it can be undeleted and will remove any violations -- Dr. Awab Alvi (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

• If you want to be considered a Wikipedian, you will learn to create wikilinks. I did hesitate momentarily before deleting your user page because you have made useful edits but it was a blatant case of a fake article. A user page must be: written in the first person, tell us a little about what you do in the real world and plenty about what you do on Wikipedia. If you create such a page it will probably stick. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry you deemed it as a fake article, and found it violating the Wikipedia code of conduct, but could a warning on that page helped? truncating it / deleting seems quite harsh, but that said, discipline is probably the reason why Wikipedia is a big success as is - would it be rude to ask if you could possibly email me the text of the page, as a courtesy, since I don't see it being recovered, I spent sometime building it up, worded it carefully, more so as a placeholder, I did not feel it should be on a mainspace so I chose to edit it on my own userspace, as it was about myself, lesson probably learnt, it should have been in Sandbox / drafts, I feel really sad to have it vanished in a heartbeat, if it violates Wikipedia, i'd humbly appreciate if you could respect the time I spent to modify the article and allowing me to keep it in my own archives? please - Dr. Awab Alvi (talk) 07:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

• Text emailed. No, it should not be in sandbox / drafts - it should be completely away from Wikipedia. Kindly have the humility to wait until someone with no COI thinks you are notable and writes about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the email - agreed it remains OFF from Wikipedia - cheers Dr. Awab Alvi (talk) 11:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Mindport

Hi User:RHaworth I did not get a chance to recover material from the page Mindport nor did I get a chance to address issues by rewriting. In any case, please direct me to how to recover this work so I can continue working on it in a sandbox. Isn't this how Wikipedia is supposed to work, working on pages until they are ready to meet standards for publication? Also, I do not understand why talk pages are deleted. It seems like a convenient way to avoid genuine discussion of standards and issues, or other opinions, somewhat resembling Fahrenheit 451, or at minimum, not in the spirit of platonic dialogue. Newvisionpublisher (talk) 01:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Newvisionpublisher

• Just for once I am going to refuse to email you the content until you assure me that you will keep it a long way from Wikipedia. What horribly pretentious rubbish: you have invented what seems to be a new style of GUI - it is difficult to tell from your description - but for some reason you feel it necessary to bring Kant, Wittgenstein and even Hammurabi into your description. Kindly have the decency to wait until this design becomes widely used (obviously if you try and enforce your patent and ask for licence fees, then no-one is going to use it) when someone with no COI will write it up. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Request to undelete EMMA for Peace

Dear RHaworth , Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia Foundation. I request you to undelete & restore EMMA for Peace. This page has been deleted by you. Reason was copyright infringement of http://www.emmaforpeace.org/ . I edited & added some contents from their official page. It was modified version. I had no chance to remove or modify contents because there's no warning or Tagging. Suddenly page was deleted. If we had a chance we could modify the article based on wiki rules. You know , EMMA for Peace is Notable subject. Please do some modification or clean up. My humble request to you undelete EMMA for Peace and restore the page with appropriate contents. Thanks again! — Khocon (talk) 4:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

• I have some doubts about this: who are the "we" that you mention. I see that you have been warned about paid editing - should this page have a paid editing warning? But I have restored it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for restoring the article. For clarify "we" i meant we all Wikipedian or editors. Yes, i have been warned about paid editing. They thought some of my works were paid editing. Good luck. — Khocon (talk) 9:57, 26 March 2015 (GMT+6)

Text of deleted article on Hans-Jürgen Sasse

Hi RHaworth, Can you please provide me the text of my article on Hans-Jürgen Sasse? I do not know what the correct link for a deleted article is, but my best guess is <ref> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans-J%C3%BCrgen_Sasse. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)</ref> I'd like to contest the speedy deletion (on the grounds that I am also the author of the text cited at http://www.ssila.org/2015/03/05/hans-jurgen-sasse-1943-2015/.) I'm an editor of the SSILA newsletter and wrote the obituary that is the basis for the Wikipedia article. Once I have the text, I can donate the material to Wikipedia. Thanks, George Aaron Broadwell, G.broadwell (talk) 18:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

• Well at least you tried to provide a link which is more than most people writing here do. But unfortunately your link was multiply wrong: external link format not wikilink, in a cite web template which we don't use on talk pages or for wikilinks, in a <ref> which ditto and finally pointing to a page that has never existed! But is actually very simple: the page that told you that I had done the deletion is the page to which you should be linking.

"Once I have the text, I can donate" it - strange logic. What is preventing you doing the donation first by getting a {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} tag placed on your obit at ssila.org? In fact I have already restored your text. I have decided to leave it as an exercise to the student to find it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Book Creator function

[Transferred to User talk:Swamixyz]

UTRS unblock requst

Howdy, I've got an unblock request on UTRS (#13418) from Gabriel Andrijausco (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). The user is requesting an unblock based on the submission as follows:

I didn't know all rules correctly, I was in my fantasy world creating virtual tv series and etc... I admit that I wouldn't do it knowing the rules. Now I know them and I'm sorry for my self!
— User:Gabriel Andrijausco

If you have any comments on this block, I would appreciate it. Otherwise, I will deny this request in 3-4 days. Thanks, Nakon 01:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

• You could ask him what sort of edits he intends to do if unblocked. But I will leave it entirely to your judgement. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Tina Huang v. Twitter

Tina Huang v. Twitter deleted as vandalism within minutes of its creation? You have just deleted Tina Huang v. Twitter as Vandalism? Ottawahitech (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Irfan afzal singer

You've blocked them, but their uploads still need to be cleaned up. —George8211 / T 07:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

• When someone posts a flagrant self-promotional page with a picture, I usually do not bother to do anything about the picture/s even if they are uploaded here. A notable exception is Paul T T Easter who really annoys me. In the case of Irfan Afzal the uploads are all to the Commons where I have no special rights so if you think they should be deleted, you can make the requests just as easily as I could. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)